Jinhyung Chon

Dr. Jinhyung Chon

Affiliation 1: Division of Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2021 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMin Kim
Min Kim
KSKihwan Song
Kihwan Song
JCJinhyung Chon
Jinhyung Chon

15 April 2021 in Landscape and Ecological Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HLHemin Lee
Hemin Lee
KSKihwan Song
Kihwan Song
GKGoWoon Kim
GoWoon Kim
JCJinhyung Chon
Jinhyung Chon

1 November 2018 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SYSoojin You
Soojin You
MKMin Kim
Min Kim
JLJunga Lee
Junga Lee
JCJinhyung Chon
Jinhyung Chon

5 December 2017 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YCYun Eui Choi
Yun Eui Choi
MDMinsun Doh
Minsun Doh
SPSamuel Park
Samuel Park
JCJinhyung Chon
Jinhyung Chon
The purpose of this study is to introduce transformation plans that can stimulate responsible ecotourism by using systems thinking to solve ecotourism problems in Korea. Systems thinking is a research method used to understand the operating mechanisms of the variables that influence an entire system, in order to identify its problems. The four types of ecotourism systems are classified as follows: low-infrastructure and resident-initiated, high-infrastructure and resident-initiated, high-infrastructure and government-initiated and low-infrastructure and government-initiated. These systems vary based on the need for tourism facilities and the form of governance. Each type of system is analyzed using the systems thinking process (dynamic thinking, causal thinking, feedback thinking, strategic thinking) at representative ecotourism sites in Jeollanam-do and the following transformation plans are proposed to improve the responsibility at the tourism sites: First, local residents will develop a system to manage and operate ecotourism ventures and establish cooperative governance structures to strengthen the local capacity. Second, ecotourism operators will improve the quality of their educational and interpretative programs and tourist information platforms in order to raise awareness of the responsibilities of ecotourists. Third, ecotourism systems that are improved through ecotourists’ and tour operators' heightened senses of responsibility can sustain ecotourism independently. These transformation plans can be applied to policy proposals for revitalizing ecotourism, to guidelines for improving community resilience and to biological habitat protection plans. This study is meaningful in that it discusses the role of stakeholders in ecotourism planning and promoting responsible tourism and their role in utilizing and conserving natural resources accordingly.

1 November 2018 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKihwan Song
Kihwan Song
SYSoojin You
Soojin You
JCJinhyung Chon
Jinhyung Chon

28 October 2014 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJunga Lee
Junga Lee
JCJinhyung Chon
Jinhyung Chon
Changwoo AhnChangwoo Ahn
Changwoo Ahn
Ecosystem service values have rarely been incorporated in the process of planning ecological infrastructure for urban areas. Urban ecological infrastructure is a network system of natural lands and waters that provides ecosystem services. The purpose of this study was to design landscape corridors that maximize the value of ecosystem services in ecological infrastructure planning. We explored the optimal corridors to enhance the connectivity among landscape elements to design an ecological infrastructure for the city of Gwacheon, South Korea, as an example of a small urban area. We calculated the value of ecosystem services using standardized estimation indices based on an intensive review of the relevant literature and employed the least-cost path method to optimize the connectivity of landscape structural elements. The land use type in the city with the highest estimated value of ecosystem services was the riparian zone (i.e., 2011 US$7,312.16/ha). Given areal coverage of all land use types, the estimated value of developed area open spaces was 2011 US$899,803.25, corresponding to the highest contribution to the total value of ecosystem services. Therefore, the optimal configured dispersal corridors for wildlife were found from the riparian zones (source area) to the developed area open spaces (destination area) in the city. Several challenges remain for improving the estimation of the value of ecosystem services and incorporating these ecosystems in ecological infrastructure planning. Nonetheless, the approaches taken to estimate the value of ecosystem services and design landscape corridors in this study may be of value to future efforts in urban ecological infrastructure planning.