Generally, patients with stage I-IIIa (TNM) pulmonary carcinoid disease have a favourable prognosis after curative resection. Yet, distant recurrence of disease after curative surgery occurs in approximately 1–6% of patients with typical carcinoid and 14–29% in patients with atypical carcinoid disease, respectively. Known predictors of distant recurrence of disease are atypical carcinoid, lymphatic involvement, and incomplete resection status. However, none of them can be reliably used, alone or in combination, to exclude patients from long-term follow-up (advised 15 years). By genomic profiling, Orthopedia homeobox (OTP) has been identified as a promising prognostic marker for pulmonary carcinoid with a favourable prognosis and low risk of distant disease recurrence. Moreover, OTP is a highly specific marker for carcinoids of pulmonary origin and recent genome wide analysis has identified OTP as a crucial predictor of aggressive tumor behaviour. OTP in combination with CD44, a stem cell marker and cell-surface protein, enables the identification of patients with surgical resected carcinoid disease that could potentially be excluded from long-term follow-up. In future clinical practice OTP may enable clinicians to reduce the diagnostic burden and related distress and reduce costs of long-term radiological assessments in patients with a pulmonary carcinoid. This review addresses the current clinical value of OTP and the possible molecular mechanisms regulating OTP expression and function in pulmonary carcinoids.

Although most patients with pulmonary carcinoid (PC) can be cured by surgery, relapse may occur until 15 years after resection in up to 10% of patients. This is unpredictable at the outset, necessitating extensive follow-up (FU). We sought to determine whether an immunohistochemical marker panel (OTP, CD44, and Ki-67) could better indicate relapse-free survival (RFS) and increase uniformity among pathologists regarding carcinoid classification. To this purpose, all surgically resected PC (2003-2012) were identified in the Dutch cancer/pathology registry, and a matched relapse vs nonrelapse cohort (ratio 1:2, N = 161) was created. Cases were revised by 4 pathologists and additionally for immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers. The marker panel was applied to the complete population-based cohort (N = 536) to investigate the negative predictive value (NPV) of relapse. Median FU was 86.7 months. WHO classification among pathologists revealed poor overall agreement (mitotic count: 0.380, necrosis: 0.476) compared with IHC markers (Ki-67: 0.917, OTP: 0.984, CD44: 0.976). The mean NPV of all pathologists increased from 0.74 (World Health Organization, WHO) to 0.85 (IHC marker panel). IHC risk stratification of the complete cohort, regardless of subtype, showed a statistically significant difference in RFS between patients with high risk (n = 222) and low risk (n = 314), with an NPV of 95.9%. In conclusion, our results support the use of biomarker-driven FU management for patients with PC as the OTP/CD44/KI-67 marker panel can reliably predict which patients will probably not develop relapse over time and may benefit from a more limited postoperative follow-up. Furthermore, IHC marker assessment by pathologists for PC stratification is superior to traditional WHO typing.

Limited number of tumor types have been examined for Orthopedia Homeobox (OTP) expression. In pulmonary carcinoids, loss of expression is a strong indicator of poor prognosis. Here, we investigated OTP expression in 37 different tumor types, and the association between OTP expression and DNA methylation levels in lung neuroendocrine neoplasms. We analyzed publicly available multi‐omics data (whole‐exome‐, whole‐genome‐, RNA sequencing and Epic 850K‐methylation array) of 58 typical carcinoids, 27 atypical carcinoids, 69 large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and 51 small cell lung cancer patients and TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) data of 33 tumor types. 850K‐methylation analysis was cross‐validated using targeted pyrosequencing on 35 carcinoids. We report bimodality of OTP expression in carcinoids (OTP^high vs OTP^low group, likelihood‐ratio test P = 1.5 × 10⁻²), with the OTP^high group specific to pulmonary carcinoids while absent from all other cohorts analyzed. Significantly different DNA methylation levels were observed between OTP^high and OTP^low carcinoids in 12/34 OTP infinium probes (FDR < 0.05 and β‐value effect size > .2). OTP^low carcinoids harbor high DNA methylation levels as compared to OTP^high carcinoids. OTP^low carcinoids showed a significantly worse overall survival (log‐rank test P = .0052). Gene set enrichment analysis for somatically mutated genes associated with hallmarks of cancer showed robust enrichment of three hallmarks in the OTP^low group, that is, sustaining proliferative signaling, evading growth suppressor and genome instability and mutation. Together our data suggest that high OTP expression is a unique feature of pulmonary carcinoids with a favorable prognosis and that in poor prognostic patients, OTP expression is lost, most likely due to changes in DNA methylation levels.

The predictive value of the extent of peri-operative lymph node (LN) sampling in relation to disease relapse in patients with pulmonary carcinoid (PC) is unknown. Furthermore, post-surgery follow-up recommendations rely on institutional retrospective studies with short follow-ups. We aimed to address these shortcomings by examining the relation between LN sampling and relapse in a population-based cohort with long-term follow-up. By combining the Dutch nationwide pathology and cancer registries, all patients with surgically resected PC (2003–2012) were included in this analysis (last update 2020). The extent of surgical LN dissection was scored for the number of LN samples, location (hilar/mediastinal), and completeness of resection according to European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) guidelines. Relapse-free interval (RFI) was evaluated using Kaplan Meier and multivariate regression analysis. 662 patients were included. The median follow-up was 87.5 months. Relapse occurred in 10% of patients, mostly liver (51.8%) and locoregional sites (45%). The median RFI was 48.1 months (95% CI 36.8–59.4). Poor prognostic factors were atypical carcinoid, pN1/2, and R1/R2 resection. In 546 patients LN dissection data could be retrieved; at least one N2 LN was examined in 44% and completeness according to ESTS in merely 7%. In 477 cN0 patients, 5.9% had pN1 and 2.5% had pN2 disease. In conclusion, relapse occurred in 10% of PC patients with a median RFI of 48.1 months thereby underscoring the necessity of long-term follow-up. Extended mediastinal LN sampling was rarely performed but systematic nodal evaluation is recommended as it provides prognostic information on distant relapse.

Metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cause of cancer-related mortality, of which peritoneal metastases (PMs) have the worse outcome. Metastasis-specific markers may help predict the spread of tumor cells and select patients for preventive strategies. This exploratory pilot study aimed to gain more insight into genetic alterations in primary CRC tumors, which might be a predictive factor for the development of PM. Forty patients with T3 stage CRC were retrospectively divided in three groups: without metachronous metastases during 5-year follow-up (M0, n = 20), with metachronous liver metastases (LM, n = 10) and with metachronous PM (PM, n = 10). Patients with synchronous metastases were excluded. Primary formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples were analyzed via comprehensive genome sequencing (TSO500 analysis) to identify DNA alterations and RNA fusion transcripts in 523 genes and 55 genes, respectively. Thirty-eight samples were included for final analysis. Four M0 tumors and one PM tumor were microsatellite instable. BRAF mutations were uniquely identified in three microsatellite-stable (MSS) PM tumors (37.5%, p = 0.010). RNA analysis showed an additional FAM198A-RAF1 fusion in one PM sample. BRAF p.V600E mutations were only present in PM patients with MSS tumors. Greater attention should be paid to BRAF-mutated tumors in relation to the development of metachronous PM.

Background: As colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) have a poor prognosis, new treatment options are currently being investigated for CRC patients. Specific biomarkers in the primary tumor could serve as a prediction tool to estimate the risk of distant metastatic spread. This would help identify patients eligible for early treatment. Aim: To give an overview of previously studied DNA and RNA alterations in the primary tumor correlated to colorectal PM and investigate which gene mutations should be further studied. Methods: A systematic review of all published studies reporting genomic analyses on the primary tissue of CRC tumors in relation to PM was undertaken according to PRISMA guidelines. Results: Overall, 32 studies with 18,906 patients were included. BRAF mutations were analyzed in 17 articles, of which 10 found a significant association with PM. For all other reported genes, no association with PM was found. Two analyses with broader cancer panels did not reveal any new biomarkers. Conclusion: An association of specific biomarkers in the primary tumors of CRC patients with metastatic spread into peritoneum could not be proven. The role of BRAF mutations should be further investigated. In addition, studies searching for potential novel biomarkers are still required.