Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the major side effects of chemotherapy. Its main symptoms are pain, paresthesia, and numbness. However, the mechanisms underlying the development of CIPN remain unclear and standard treatments have not been established. Recently, there has been a growing interest in various approaches to overcome the limitations of the existing treatments. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the concurrent use of two complementary and alternative therapies: electroacupuncture (EA) and Chuna manual therapy (CMT), with pregabalin, which is the conventional pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain. Methods/design: This is an open-label, parallel, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial, which includes 90 patients with colorectal and breast cancer, who developed CIPN. After a 2-week preparation period, the patients are divided into three groups (pregabalin administration group, pregabalin + EA treatment group, and pregabalin + CMT treatment group), treated for approximately 5 weeks and followed-up 4 weeks after treatment. The primary outcome is assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group Neurotoxicity subscale score (version 4.0) and the secondary outcome is measured using the Quality of Life Questionnaire-CIPN 20-Item Scale (version 3.0) and the quality of life questionnaire (version 3.0) developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Moreover, exploratory efficacy and safety evaluations will be conducted based on the chemotherapy-completion rate and nerve conduction studies.

Lee I, et al. J Breast Cancer. 2020 Sep;24:e3. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2021.24.e3

Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most common side effects of chemotherapy, and effective treatments for CIPN are still lacking. For this reason, there is a growing interest in complementary and alternative medicine as a potential source of nonsurgical treatments for CIPN symptoms alongside pregabalin. One such option being explored is Chuna manual therapy (CMT), a traditional Korean manual therapy. Methods: This study compares the effectiveness and safety of using only pregabalin (PG) as a conventional method of treating breast and colorectal cancer patients with CIPN symptoms with a combination of both PG and electroacupuncture (EA) or CMT, while also assessing the feasibility of future large-scale clinical studies. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, only 74 CIPN patients were recruited to this study. Twenty-five were assigned to the PG group, 26 to the PG + EA group, and 22 to the PG + CMT group for a five-week treatment and a four-week follow-up study. Results: For the primary outcome, we evaluated the mean differences in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) compared to the baseline at week 5 (visit 4). Although we found that the PG + CMT group showed the biggest difference (−16.64 [95% CI: −25.16, −8.11]) compared to the PG group (−8.60 [95% CI: −14.93, −2.27]) and the PG + EA group (−6.73 [95% CI: −12.34, −1.13]), this finding lacked statistical significance (p = 0.2075). In terms of safety, two patients in the PG + CMT group reported side effects: one bruise and one headache. Conclusions: The low attrition and high adherence rates of all the groups, and the similar rates of side effects among them, support the feasibility of larger-scale follow-up studies.