Elmar Schmaltz

Dr. Elmar Schmaltz

Federal Agency for Water Management, Pollnbergstraße 3252, Petzenkirchen, Austria
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 May 2020 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PFPeter Fiener
Peter Fiener
Tomáš DostálTomáš Dostál
Tomáš Dostál
Josef KrásaJosef Krása
Josef Krása
Elmar SchmaltzElmar Schmaltz
Elmar Schmaltz
Peter StraussPeter Strauss
Peter Strauss
FWFlorian Wilken
Florian Wilken
In the European Union, soil erosion is identified as one of the main environmental threats, addressed with a variety of rules and regulations for soil and water conservation. The by far most often officially used tool to determine soil erosion is the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) and its regional adaptions. The aim of this study is to use three different regional USLE-based approaches in three different test catchments in the Czech Republic, Germany, and Austria to determine differences in model results and compare these with the revised USLE-base European soil erosion map. The different regional model adaptations and implementation techniques result in substantial differences in test catchment specific mean erosion (up to 75% difference). Much more pronounced differences were modelled for individual fields. The comparison of the region-specific USLE approaches with the revised USLE-base European erosion map underlines the problems and limitations of harmonization procedures. The EU map limits the range of modelled erosion and overall shows a substantially lower mean erosion compared to all region-specific approaches. In general, the results indicate that even if many EU countries use USLE technology as basis for soil conservation planning, a truly consistent method does not exist, and more efforts are needed to homogenize the different methods without losing the USLE-specific knowledge developed in the different regions over the last decades.

6 March 2018 in Landslides
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Elmar SchmaltzElmar Schmaltz
Elmar Schmaltz
MMMartin Mergili
Martin Mergili
Root systems of trees reinforce the underlying soil in hillslope environments and therefore potentially increase slope stability. So far, the influence of root systems is disregarded in Geographic Information System (GIS) models that calculate slope stability along distinct failure plane. In this study, we analyse the impact of different root system compositions and densities on slope stability conditions computed by a GIS-based slip surface model. We apply the 2.5D slip surface model r.slope.stability to 23 root system scenarios imposed on pyramidoid-shaped elements of a generic landscape. Shallow, taproot and mixed root systems are approximated by paraboloids and different stand and patch densities are considered. The slope failure probability (Pf) is derived for each raster cell of the generic landscape, considering the reinforcement through root cohesion. Average and standard deviation of Pf are analysed for each scenario. As expected, the r.slope.stability yields the highest values of Pf for the scenario without roots. In contrast, homogeneous stands with taproot or mixed root systems yield the lowest values of Pf. Pf generally decreases with increasing stand density, whereby stand density appears to exert a more pronounced influence on Pf than patch density. For patchy stands, Pf increases with a decreasing size of the tested slip surfaces. The patterns yielded by the computational experiments are largely in line with the results of previous studies. This approach provides an innovative and simple strategy to approximate the additional cohesion supplied by root systems and thereby considers various compositions of forest stands in 2.5D slip surface models. Our findings will be useful for developing strategies towards appropriately parameterising root reinforcement in real-world slope stability modelling campaigns.

11 December 2018 in Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Elmar SchmaltzElmar Schmaltz
Elmar Schmaltz
LBL.P.H. Van Beek
L.P.H. Van Beek
Thom BogaardThom Bogaard
Thom Bogaard
SKSabine Kraushaar
Sabine Kraushaar
Stefan StegerStefan Steger
Stefan Steger
TGThomas Glade
Thomas Glade
Despite the importance of land cover on landscape hydrology and slope stability, the representation of land cover dynamics in physically based models and their associated ecohydrological effects on slope stability is rather scarce. In this study, we assess the impact of different levels of complexity in land cover parameterisation on the explanatory power of a dynamic and process‐based spatial slope stability model. Firstly, we present available and collected data sets and account for the stepwise parameterisation of the model. Secondly, we present approaches to simulate land cover: 1) a grassland landscape without forest coverage; 2) spatially static forest conditions, in which we assume limited knowledge about forest composition; 3) more detailed information of forested areas based on the computation of leaf area development and the implementation of vegetation‐related processes; 4) similar to the third approach but with the additional consideration of the spatial expansion and vertical growth of vegetation. Lastly, the model is calibrated based on meteorological data sets and groundwater measurements. The model results are quantitatively validated for two landslide‐triggering events that occurred in Western Austria. Predictive performances are estimated using the Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC). Our findings indicate that the performance of the slope stability model was strongly determined by model complexity and land cover parameterisation. The implementation of leaf area development and land cover dynamics further yield an acceptable predictive performance (AUC ~0.71‐0.75) and a better conservativeness of the predicted unstable areas (FoC ~0.71). The consideration of dynamic land cover expansion provided better performances than the solely consideration of leaf area development. The results of this study highlight that an increase of effort in the land cover parameterisation of a dynamic slope stability model can increase the explanatory power of the model. © 2018 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

1 March 2021 in Journal of Archaeological Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ABAlvise Barbieri
Alvise Barbieri
Felix BachoferFelix Bachofer
Felix Bachofer
Elmar SchmaltzElmar Schmaltz
Elmar Schmaltz
CLCarsten Leven
Carsten Leven
NCNicholas J. Conard
Nicholas J. Conard
CMChristopher E. Miller
Christopher E. Miller

11 April 2022 in CATENA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSM.J. Stumvoll
M.J. Stumvoll
Elmar SchmaltzElmar Schmaltz
Elmar Schmaltz
RKRobert Kanta
Robert Kanta
HRH. Roth
H. Roth
BGB. Grall
B. Grall
TGT. Glade
T. Glade

1 January 2016 in Procedia Earth and Planetary Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Elmar SchmaltzElmar Schmaltz
Elmar Schmaltz
Stefan StegerStefan Steger
Stefan Steger
RBRainer Bell
Rainer Bell
TGThomas Glade
Thomas Glade
RBRens van Beek
Rens van Beek
NPNorbert Pfeifer
Norbert Pfeifer
Landslides play a key role in landscape evolution in the Eastern Alps. These geomorphic phenomena are influenced by multiple interdependent and interacting natural and anthropogenic factors. An in-depth evaluation of the spatial distribution of existing landslides enables to gain first insights into potentially hazardous areas. Morphometric analysis techniques of mapped landslides as well as their date of occurrence allow to infer their activity and also potential impacts on affected areas. The prevalent slow moving landslides and inactive slipping areas were mapped and analysed via digital terrain models (DTM), shaded relief images of highly resolved airborne laserscanning (ALS) data and in-field observations. Orthophotos from aerial surveys and ALS data allowed a deferred-time analyses of past landslide occurrences including a record of recent slope movements. All mapped landslides were classified and analysed with geomorphometric indices. Pedological processes, the lithological setting and anthropogenic landscape transformationwere taken into account when interpreting the results. The geomorphometrical evaluation of the sliding areas determine the creation of a multitemporal landslide inventory in the Northern Walgau