Abnormal expression and dysfunction of Annexins (ANXA1-11, 13) have been widely found in several types of cancer. However, the expression pattern and prognostic value of Annexins in bladder cancer (BC) are currently still unknown. In this study, survival analysis by our in-house OSblca web server revealed that high ANXA1/2/3/5/6 expression was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) in BC patients, while higher ANXA11 was associated with increased OS. Through Oncomine and GEPIA2 database analysis, we found that ANXA2/3/4/13 were up-regulated, whereas ANXA1/5/6 were down-regulated in BC compared with normal bladder tissues. Further LASSO analysis built an Annexin-Related Prognostic Signature (ARPS, including four members ANXA1/5/6/10) in the TCGA BC cohort and validated it in three independent GEO BC cohorts (GSE31684, GSE32548, GSE48075). Multivariate COX analysis demonstrated that ARPS is an independent prognostic signature for BC. Moreover, GSEA results showed that immune-related pathways, such as epithelial–mesenchymal transition and IL6/JAK/STAT3 signaling were enriched in the high ARPS risk groups, while the low ARPS risk group mainly regulated metabolism-related processes, such as adipogenesis and bile acid metabolism. In conclusion, our study comprehensively analyzed the mRNA expression and prognosis of Annexin family members in BC, constructed an Annexin-related prognostic signature using LASSO and COX regression, and validated it in four independent BC cohorts, which might help to improve clinical outcomes of BC patients, offer insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms of BC development and suggest potential therapeutic targets for BC.

Background: Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a type of rare and aggressive tumor. The standard treatment for UCS involves surgical treatment followed by radiochemotherapy. Clinical outcomes of UCS patients are poor due to high metastasis and relapse rate. Therefore, new targeted therapy strategies for UCS are needed. Because UCS is highly heterogenous, it is critical to identify and develop prognostic biomarkers to distinguish molecular subtypes of UCS for better treatment guidance. Methods: Using gene expression profiles and clinical follow-up data, we developed an online consensus survival analysis tool named OSucs. This web tool allows researchers to conveniently analyze the prognostic abilities of candidate genes in UCS. Results: To test the reliability of this server, we analyzed five previously reported prognostic biomarkers, all of which showed significant prognostic impacts. In addition, ETV4 (ETS variant transcription factor 4), ANGPTL4 (Angiopoietin-like protein 4), HIST1H1C (Histone cluster 1 H1 family member c) and CTSV (Cathepsin V) showed prognostic potential in a molecular subtype-specific manner. Conclusion: We built a platform for researchers to analyze if genes have prognostic potentials in UCS.