Vito Manghisi

Dr. Vito Manghisi

Politecnico di Bari
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 August 2017 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Antonio E. UvaAntonio E. Uva
Antonio E. Uva
MGMichele Gattullo
Michele Gattullo
Vito ManghisiVito Manghisi
Vito Manghisi
DSDaniele Spagnulo
Daniele Spagnulo
Giuseppe Leonardo CascellaGiuseppe Leonardo Cascella
Giuseppe Leonardo Cascella
MFMichele Fiorentino
Michele Fiorentino

1 November 2017 in Applied Ergonomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Vito ManghisiVito Manghisi
Vito Manghisi
Antonio E. UvaAntonio E. Uva
Antonio E. Uva
MFMichele Fiorentino
Michele Fiorentino
Vitoantonio BevilacquaVitoantonio Bevilacqua
Vitoantonio Bevilacqua
GTGianpaolo Francesco Trotta
Gianpaolo Francesco Trotta
GMGiuseppe Monno
Giuseppe Monno

30 November 2021 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ELEnricoandrea Laviola
Enricoandrea Laviola
MGMichele Gattullo
Michele Gattullo
Vito ManghisiVito Manghisi
Vito Manghisi
Michele FiorentinoMichele Fiorentino
Michele Fiorentino
Antonio E. UvaAntonio E. Uva
Antonio E. Uva

1 July 2018 in Journal of Cultural Heritage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Vito ManghisiVito Manghisi
Vito Manghisi
Antonio E. UvaAntonio E. Uva
Antonio E. Uva
MFMichele Fiorentino
Michele Fiorentino
MGMichele Gattullo
Michele Gattullo
ABAntonio Boccaccio
Antonio Boccaccio
GMGiuseppe Monno
Giuseppe Monno

1 February 2020 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GPGianluca Percoco
Gianluca Percoco
Antonio E. UvaAntonio E. Uva
Antonio E. Uva
Michele FiorentinoMichele Fiorentino
Michele Fiorentino
MGMichele Gattullo
Michele Gattullo
Vito ManghisiVito Manghisi
Vito Manghisi
ABAntonio Boccaccio
Antonio Boccaccio
In spite of the rather large use of the fused deposition modeling (FDM) technique for the fabrication of scaffolds, no studies are reported in the literature that optimize the geometry of such scaffold types based on mechanobiological criteria. We implemented a mechanobiology-based optimization algorithm to determine the optimal distance between the strands in cylindrical scaffolds subjected to compression. The optimized scaffolds were then 3D printed with the FDM technique and successively measured. We found that the difference between the optimized distances and the average measured ones never exceeded 8.27% of the optimized distance. However, we found that large fabrication errors are made on the filament diameter when the filament diameter to be realized differs significantly with respect to the diameter of the nozzle utilized for the extrusion. This feasibility study demonstrated that the FDM technique is suitable to build accurate scaffold samples only in the cases where the strand diameter is close to the nozzle diameter. Conversely, when a large difference exists, large fabrication errors can be committed on the diameter of the filaments. In general, the scaffolds realized with the FDM technique were predicted to stimulate the formation of amounts of bone smaller than those that can be obtained with other regular beam-based scaffolds.

1 January 2020 in Procedia Manufacturing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Vito ManghisiVito Manghisi
Vito Manghisi
AUAntonio E. Uva
Antonio E. Uva
MFMichele Fiorentino
Michele Fiorentino
MGMichele Gattullo
Michele Gattullo
ABAntonio Boccaccio
Antonio Boccaccio
AEAlessandro Evangelista
Alessandro Evangelista