Mobile and tablet apps, ubiquitous and pervasive computing, wearable computing and domotics for health.

In standard taxonomies, motor skills are typically treated as representative of implicit or procedural memory. We examined two emblematic tasks of implicit motor learning, sensorimotor adaptation and sequence learning, asking whether individual differences in learning are correlated between these tasks, as well as how individual differences within each task are related to different performance variables. As a prerequisite, it was essential to establish the reliability of learning measures for each task. Participants were tested twice on a visuomotor adaptation task and on a sequence learning task, either the serial reaction time task or the alternating reaction time task. Learning was evident in all tasks at the group level and reliable at the individual level in visuomotor adaptation and the alternating reaction time task but not in the serial reaction time task. Performance variability was predictive of learning in both domains, yet the relationship was in the opposite direction for adaptation and sequence learning. For the former, faster learning was associated with lower variability, consistent with models of sensorimotor adaptation in which learning rates are sensitive to noise. For the latter, greater learning was associated with higher variability and slower reaction times, factors that may facilitate the spread of activation required to form predictive, sequential associations. Interestingly, learning measures of the different tasks were not correlated. Together, these results oppose a shared process for implicit learning in sensorimotor adaptation and sequence learning and provide insight into the factors that account for individual differences in learning within each task domain.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We investigated individual differences in the ability to implicitly learn motor skills. As a prerequisite, we assessed whether individual differences were reliable across test sessions. We found that two commonly used tasks of implicit learning, visuomotor adaptation and the alternating serial reaction time task, exhibited good test-retest reliability in measures of learning and performance. However, the learning measures did not correlate between the two tasks, arguing against a shared process for implicit motor learning.

Introduction: Migraine is a chronic neurological disease manifesting as attacks of disabling head pain and associated symptoms. Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) is a non-pharmacological, prescribed, wearable device (Nerivio®). This device has been certified by the FDA for the acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 12 years of age or older. The device is affixed to the user’s arm during 45-min treatment sessions and is operated using a smartphone app. This study (NCT05769322) aims to evaluate whether frequent use of REN for the acute treatment of migraine in adolescents resulted in a reduction in monthly migraine treatment days (MMTD), as previously demonstrated in adults through a dedicated prevention clinical trial (NCT04828707).Methods: The study included real-world prospective data from adolescent patients who used REN on at least 10 days every 28-day month, following the REN migraine prevention guideline of an every-other-day pattern. Additional requirements were at least three REN treatment days in each of the two subsequent months. The number of MMTD was used as a proxy measure for the number of monthly migraine days (MMD). The change in MMTD from the first month, taken as a “baseline,” to each of the following months was used to evaluate the presence and size of potential migraine preventive benefits of REN in adolescents.Results: A total of 83 adolescents were eligible for analysis. The users were 15.9 ± 1.3 years of age (mean ± SD), and 89% of them were female. The results demonstrated a substantial month-to-month reduction in the mean (±SD) number of REN treatment days from 12.6 (±3.2) MMTD in the first month to 9.0 (±4.8) MMTD in the second month (p < 0.001), and a further decrease to 7.4 (±4.2) MMTD in the third month (p < 0.001). This indicates an accumulative reduction of 5.2 (±4.8) mean REN MMTD from the first month to the third month of consecutive REN treatment. The users also reported consistent 2-h acute pain responses in at least 50% of their treated attacks, with 61.9% of the users reported experiencing pain relief, 24.5% reported pain freedom, 67.4% indicated relief in functional disability, and 41.3% reported complete freedom from functional disability.Conclusion: The frequent use of REN among adolescents as an acute treatment for migraine attacks resulted in a decrease in the mean number of monthly treatment days in the subsequent months, suggesting that REN may have potential preventive benefits for migraine in this subpopulation.

Nearly 10% of children and adolescents in the United States experience migraine. Pharmacologic treatment of migraine in adolescents is limited due to only few US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications, limited efficacy, or lack of tolerability. Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) is a nonpharmacologic abortive treatment for migraine, cleared by the FDA for patients aged 12 years and above. This study evaluated real-world efficacy of REN in adolescents aged 12 to 17 years. Real-world data were collected from patients aged 12 to 17 years treated with the REN device (Nerivio) from January 1, 2021, to May 31, 2022. Study's end points included consistent efficacy two hours after treatment, use of REN as a standalone versus as an adjunct therapy, treatment intensity, and safety. Of 1629 adolescents included in the study, consistent response in at least 50% of treatments at two hours posttreatment was achieved by 60.3% of patients for pain relief, 26.3% for pain freedom, 66.3% for functional disability relief, and 41.2% for functional disability freedom. Of 2365 treatments in which medication usage was reported, REN was used as standalone therapy in 64.4% of the treatments, REN was combined with over-the-counter medications in 18.6%, and it was combined with prescription medications in 17%. Mean treatment intensity from 13,716 treatments was 28.5% (±13.6%) of the max stimulator output. Only three device-related adverse events were reported, all minor. This real-world analysis demonstrates the persistent efficacy of REN for abortive treatment of migraine in adolescents, extending findings of prior clinical trials in adolescents and real-world studies in adults.

Assess the clinical benefits and associated direct and indirect cost-savings from Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for migraine prevention.REN, a prescribed, wearable, FDA-cleared neuromodul...

Objectives: Migraine is a prevalent neurological disorder severely impacting children and adolescents, yet only one pharmacological treatment is approved for ages 6−12 years. Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) is a nonpharmacological, prescribed, wearable device cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 12 years and older. This study evaluates REN's safety and efficacy in ages 6−11 years.Methods: Prospective acute treatment of migraine data were collected through the REN device (Nerivio) smartphone application. Endpoints were device safety (primary); consistent treatment efficacy (headache pain, functional disability, associated migraine symptoms), and REN‐medication combinations 2 h post‐treatment.Results: Children (n = 293), median age 11 years (interquartile range = 9−11), 73.7% girls, conducted 5493 REN treatments. No adverse events were reported. Efficacy in at least 50% of REN treatments was calculated from all patients who voluntarily reported pain levels, symptoms, and/or disability at treatment onset and at 2 h post‐treatment, with 72.2% (13/18) of patients reporting pain relief, 36.0% (9/25) pain freedom, 83.3% (15/18) functional disability relief, and 38.9% (7/18) functional disability freedom. Migraine‐associated symptoms disappeared in at least 50% of REN treatments in 70.0% (7/10) of patients for nausea/vomiting, 50.0% (4/8) phonophobia, and 22.2% (2/9) photophobia; 63.6% (7/11) reported freedom from at least one associated symptom. REN was used as a standalone treatment, with over‐the‐counter medications, and with prescribed headache medications in 45.4%, 34.4%, and 20.9% of treatments, respectively.Interpretation: REN may serve as a safe and efficacious acute treatment of migraine for children. Providers and families seeking a safe, effective, pill‐ and needle‐free treatment option for children suffering from migraine may consider REN.