A novel software (“Dynamic Coronary Roadmap”) was developed, which offers a real-time, dynamic overlay of the coronary tree on fluoroscopy. Once the roadmap has been automatically generated during angiography it can be used for navigation during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). As a feasibility study, we aimed to investigate the feasibility of real-time dynamic coronary roadmapping and consecutive coronary overlay during elective PCI. We studied 936 overlay runs, created following the same amount of angiographies, which were generated during 36 PCIs. Feasibility of dynamic coronary roadmapping was analyzed using a dedicated software tool. Roadmap quality (correct dynamic imaging of the vessels without relevant artefacts or missing parts) was distinguished from overlay quality (congruence of dynamic coronary roadmapping and coronary anatomy). Additionally, we assessed procedural success and the occurrence of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Roadmap quality was defined as “fit for use” in 99.5%. In 97.4% of runs overlay quality was deemed “fit for use”. Overall, we observed low inter and intra observer variability (ICC R = 0.84 for roadmap quality and R = 0.75 for overlay quality). Procedural success rate was 100%. MACCE occurred in two (5.6%) patients during post-interventional in-hospital stay and were not software-related. Dynamic coronary roadmapping provides in > 98% of cases sufficient roadmap quality with an anatomically correct overlay of the coronary vessels with good inter and intra observer variability. Future randomized studies are warranted to test possible advantages like procedure time reduction and less consumption of contrast medium.

Visual guidance through echocardiography and fluoroscopy is crucial for a successful transseptal puncture (TSP) in a prespecified region of the fossa ovalis. The novel EchoNavigator system Release II (EchoNav II, Philips Healthcare, Andover, Massachusetts, USA) enables the real-time fusion of fluoroscopic and echocardiographic images. We evaluated this new imaging method in respect to safety and efficacy of TSP during MitraClip implantation and left atrial appendage closure.

Background: Cerebrovascular events (CVE) are feared complications following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We aimed to develop a new risk model for CVE prediction with the application of multimodal imaging. Methods: From May 2011 to August 2019, a total of 2015 patients underwent TAVR at our institution. The study cohort was subdivided into a derivation cohort (n = 1365) and a validation cohort (n = 650) for risk model development. Results: Of 2015 patients, 72 (3.6%) developed TAVR-related CVE. Pre-procedural factors of our risk model were history of prior CVE, a larger aortic valve area (≥0.55 cm²), a large aortic angulation (≥48.5°), and enhanced calcification of the right coronary cusp (≥447.2 AU), left ventricular outflow tract (≥262.4 AU), and ascending thoracic aorta (≥116.4 AU). Our risk model was superior for in-hospital CVE prediction following TAVR in the establishment cohort (AUC 0.73, 95% CI 0.66–0.80; p < 0.001) compared to other risk scores, such as the EuroSCORE II or the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. Conclusions: Although CVE prediction in patients undergoing TAVR is challenging due to the complex nature of the TAVR procedure, our study highlights that multimodal imaging is a promising approach to generate a more accurate risk model for CVE prediction.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has a substantial impact on daily cardiovascular care delivery based on issues such as cost effectiveness and economic value within a restricted health care budget. Until now, potential financial benefits of third generation valve models have not been evaluated in a real-world setting. We identified 204 eligible patients (Jan 2014-Sep 2016) who either received the balloon-expandable Edwards Sapien 3 (ES3) or the self-expandable Medtronic Evolut R (MER). Baseline information, procedural characteristics, 30-day outcome as well as in-hospital costs and reimbursement were collected and analyzed. The major cost driver was initial valve-kit costs with a significantly higher amount in the ES3 group, which was set at 0 with the lower price (ES3/MER: +4390.0€ ± 3.807.0 vs. 0.0€ ± 734.1; p < 0.01). However, initial valve-kit costs were balanced by additional material costs in the MER cohort. Overall costs did not differ significantly between valve models (ES3/MER: x + 13.808.0€ ± 5.595.0 vs. x + 10.681.0€ ± 4.518.0; p = 0.6885) and reimbursement was moderate (ES3/MER: 1.649.7€ vs. 4776.7€). Quality, success rate, and costs were comparable between third generation devices. Initial valve-kit costs were significantly higher in the ES3 group, whereas overall costs did not significantly differ between the two valve types.