Increasing evidence suggests that left-sided colon cancer (LCC) and right-sided colon cancer (RCC) are emerging as two different colorectal cancer types with distinct clinical characteristics. However, the discrepancy in the underlying molecular event between these types of cancer has not been thoroughly elucidated to date and warrants comprehensive investigation. To this end, an integrated dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas was used to compare and contrast LCC and RCC, covering mutation, DNA methylation, gene expression, and miRNA. Briefly, the signaling pathway cross-talk is more prevalent in RCC than LCC, such as RCC-specific PI3K pathway, which often exhibits cross-talk with the RAS and P53 pathways. Meanwhile, methylation signatures revealed that RCC was hypermethylated relative to LCC. In addition, differentially expressed genes (n = 253) and differentially expressed miRNAs (n = 16) were determined between LCC and RCC. Especially for Prostate Cancer Susceptibility Candidate 1 (PRAC1), a gene that was closely associated with hypermethylation, was the top significantly downregulated gene in RCC. Multi-omics comparison of LCC and RCC suggests that there are more aggressive markers in RCC and that tumor heterogeneity occurs within the location-based subtypes of colon cancer. These results clarify the debate regarding the conflicting prognosis between LCC and RCC, as proposed by different studies. Implications: The underlying molecular features present in LCC and RCC identified in this study are beneficial for adopting reasonable therapeutic approaches to prolong overall survival and progression-free survival in colorectal cancer patients. Mol Cancer Res; 16(3); 476–85. ©2017 AACR.

Patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC) generally have a better prognosis than patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC. However, some MSI-H CRC patients do not gain overall survival benefits from immune checkpoint-blockade treatment. In other words, heterogeneity within the subgroup of MSI-H tumors remains poorly understood. Thus, an in-depth molecular characterization of MSI-H tumors is urgently required. Here, we use nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF)-based consensus clustering to define CRC MSI-H subtypes in The Cancer Genome Atlas and a French multicenter cohort GSE39582. CIBERSORT was used to calculate the proportions of 22 lymphocytes in tumor tissue in MSI-H subtypes. MSI-H CRC samples basically clustered into two subgroups (MSI-H1 and MSI-H2). MSI-H1 was characterized by a lower BRAF mutational status, higher frequency of chromosomal instability, global hypomethylation, and worse survival than MSI-H2. Further examination of the immune landscape showed that macrophages of the M2 phenotype were enriched in MSI-H1, which may be associated with poor prognosis in this subgroup. Our results illustrate the genetic heterogeneity in MSI-H CRCs and macrophages may serve as good targets for anticancer therapy in MSI-H1.

POLEmutations, which lead to an ultramutated phenotype in colorectal cancer (CRC), have been reported as a promising marker in immunotherapy. We performed sequencing of CRC cases in Zhejiang University (ZJU) and extracted obtainable data from recently published results, including The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Japanese studies and clinical trials, to present clinical patterns ofPOLEdriver‐mutated CRC and reveal its heterogeneity. The rate of somaticPOLEdriver mutations has been reported as 2.60% (ZJU cohort), 1.50% (TCGA cohort), 1.00% (Japan cohort), and 1.00% (Lancet cohort).POLEdriver mutations show a clearly increased mutation burden (mean TMB: 217.98 mut/Mb in ZJU; 203.13 mut/Mb in TCGA). Based on pooled data, more than 70.00% of patients withPOLEdriver mutations were diagnosed before they were 55 years old and at an early disease stage (Stage 0–II >70.00%), and more than 70.00% were male. Among Asian patients, 68.40% developedPOLEdriver mutations in the left‐side colon, whereas 64.00% of non‐Asian patients developed them in the right‐side colon (p < 0.01). The top three amino acid changes due toPOLEdriver mutations are P286R, V411L, and S459F. Investigators and physicians should ascertain the heterogeneity and clinical patterns ofPOLEdriver mutations to be better equipped to design clinical trials and analyze the data.

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare malignancy with aggressive biological behavior. This study aimed to compare the genetic landscape of HAS with liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC), gastric cancer (GC), and AFP-producing GC (AFPGC) and identify clinically actionable alterations. Thirty-eight cases of HAS were collected for whole-exome sequencing. Significantly mutated genes were identified. TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene (66%). Hypoxia, TNF-α/NFκB, mitotic spindle assembly, DNA repair, and p53 signaling pathways mutated frequently. Mutagenesis mechanisms in HAS were associated with spontaneous or enzymatic deamination of 5-methylcytosine to thymine and defective homologous recombination-related DNA damage repair. However, LIHC was characteristic of exposure to aflatoxin and aristolochic acid. The copy number variants (CNVs) in HAS was significantly different compared to LIHC, GC, and AFPGC. Aggressive behavior-related CNVs were identified, including local vascular invasion, advanced stages, and adverse prognosis. In 55.26% of HAS patients there existed at least one clinically actionable alteration, including ERBB2, FGFR1, CDK4, EGFR, MET, and MDM2 amplifications and BRCA1/2 mutations. MDM2 amplification with functional TP53 was detected in 5% of HAS patients, which was proved sensitive to MDM2 inhibitors. A total of 10.53% of HAS patients harbored TMB > 10 muts/Mb. These findings improve our understanding of the genomic features of HAS and provide potential therapeutic targets.

Background/Aims: Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteines-like 1 (SPARCL1) is abnormally expressed in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. However, the correlation between SPARCL1 expression and the prognosis of patients remains unknown. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the potential value of SPARCL1 as a prognostic predictive marker for GI malignancies. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were systematically searched for studies examining SPARCL1 and clinicopathological features, including the prognoses of patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) from individual studies were calculated and pooled using a random-effects or fix-effects model. Heterogeneity and publication bias analyses were performed. Results: Data from 8 studies, including a total of 2,356 patients, were summarized. The expression of SPARCL1 suggested a better prognosis (HR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.445-0.698, P=0.000) and was associated with clinicopathological features of GI malignancies, including distant metastasis (OR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.23-0.85, P=0.014), lymph node metastasis (OR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.39–0.81, P=0.002) and tumor differentiation (OR=2.21, 95% CI: 1.82–2.69, P=0.000). Subgroup analyses based on cancer type revealed that the expression of SPARCL1 had no effect on lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer, and it did not influence tumor differentiation in gastric cancer. Egger’s test showed no evidence of publication bias (all P>0.05). Conclusion: SPARCL1 could be a novel prognostic predictive factor for GI malignancies. The expression of SPARCL1 could influence the clinicopathological features of GI malignancies. Further large-scale studies are essential to confirm SPARCL1’s prognostic predictive value, and more fundamental experimental studies are needed to illustrate the mechanisms.

Aim: The authors previously found that SPARCL1 functions to suppress colorectal cancer metastasis. Here, the epigenetic mechanism of SPARCL1 regulation and its relationship with clinicopathological... Lay abstract The heterogeneity of colorectal cancer is largely based on their primary tumor locations. For example, patients with left-sided colon cancer generally have better prognoses and differe...