Vat photopolymerization (VPP) is an effective additive manufacturing (AM) process known for its high dimensional accuracy and excellent surface finish. It employs vector scanning and mask projection techniques to cure photopolymer resin at a specific wavelength. Among the mask projection methods, digital light processing (DLP) and liquid crystal display (LCD) VPP have gained significant popularity in various industries. To upgrade DLP and LCC VPP into a high-speed process, increasing both the printing speed and projection area in terms of the volumetric print rate is crucial. However, challenges arise, such as the high separation force between the cured part and the interface and a longer resin refilling time. Additionally, the divergence of the light-emitting diode (LED) makes controlling the irradiance homogeneity of large-sized LCD panels difficult, while low transmission rates of near ultraviolet (NUV) impact the processing time of LCD VPP. Furthermore, limitations in light intensity and fixed pixel ratios of digital micromirror devices (DMDs) constrain the increase in the projection area of DLP VPP. This paper identifies these critical issues and provides detailed reviews of available solutions, aiming to guide future research towards developing a more productive and cost-effective high-speed VPP in terms of the high volumetric print rate.

The primary concern of the Industry 4.0 is the direct digital manufacturing of customized products on demand at high production speed, high accuracy with functional material property. Although the unique capabilities of existing additive manufacturing technologies make it suitable for direct digital manufacturing, there are numerous limitations which include low printing speed, less accuracy and repeatability, and a limited selection of materials for a particular application. Therefore, a high-speed additive manufacturing approach is proposed in this paper, that is capable of achieving high speed of production, high accuracy, and surface finish, and functional material property. For better understanding, authors describe those additive manufacturing technologies that are capable of achieving the aforementioned characteristics. For validation, samples of various dimensions were 3D printed on a selective laser sintering and a high-speed multijet fusion 3D printer. The results were compared in the context of printing speed, surface roughness (Ra), and hardness of printed parts. Results revealed that the multijet fusion process is significantly faster than its counterpart while sacrificing Ra to some extent but the hardness of printed parts is not changed significantly. The selective laser sintering-printed samples had a 15% lower Ra compared with multijet fusion samples. The results also revealed that the multijet fusion process might be able to print composite/multi-materials; however, more research needs to be done.

Additively manufactured cellular structures represent a promising engineering design concept for making customized products where user-specific mechanical properties are required. One of the major challenges in the additive manufacturing (AM) process is removal of unwanted support structures from the lattice. The support structure consumes extra material, printing time, and energy for manufacturing. Postprinting, it needs extensive postprocessing work to remove it from the lattice structure chemically or mechanically. In the case of flexible materials such as thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), removing the support structure from the lattice is very difficult with the material extrusion process. In this article, a new type of a shell-shaped lattice structure inspired by sea urchin (SU) morphology is designed. This lattice can be additively manufactured by material extrusion processes such as fused deposition modeling (FDM) without requiring any support structures. The mechanical properties of the proposed structure, such as stiffness and energy absorption during loading and unloading, have been evaluated as they are important for cushioning. The compressive results indicate that the stiffness property is almost twice as high compared with the benchmarked, bending-dominated, body-centered cubic (BCC) lattice structure of the same relative density and ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) foam. Energy absorption is almost equal to the BCC lattice and 20% better than EVA foam. Last, a predictive model on stiffness behavior and energy return was developed to facilitate a systematic way to select optimal densities of the SU lattice structure for energy-absorbing applications. Visual inspection has also revealed that there is no sagging or failure of the lattice, which reduced the manufacturing time and postprocessing time, saving a significant amount of material without compromising on quality. Supportless lattice printing was also validated by printing the specimen with a different FDM printer and TPU filament. A possible application for supportless lattice structures can be for AM of customized shoe midsoles at low cost, ski boots, tires, automotive crush boxes, or any other energy-absorbing structures.