What is the prevalence of chronic endometritis (CE) in women with repeated unexplained implantation failure (RIF) at IVF, and how does antibiotic treatment affect the reproductive outcome? Chronic endometritis, associated with infection with common bacteria or mycoplasma, is common in women complaining of RIF and antibiotic treatment significantly improves the reproductive outcome at a subsequent IVF cycle. We have reported that CE is a frequent finding in women with repeated pregnancy loss and a significantly higher rate of successful pregnancies was achieved after adequate antibiotic treatment. Moreover, CE was identified in 30.3% of patients with repeated implantation failure at IVF and women diagnosed with CE had lower implantation rates (11.5%) after IVF cycles. In contrast, other authors reported that the clinical implication of CE should be considered minimal and that the reproductive outcome at IVF/ICSI cycles was not negatively affected by CE. A retrospective study was performed from January 2009 through June 2012 on 106 women with unexplained infertility and a history of RIF. All patients underwent hysteroscopy and endometrial sampling for histology and microbiological investigations. Women diagnosed with CE underwent antibiotic treatment and the effect of treatment was confirmed by hysteroscopy with biopsy. Within 6 months after treatment all women had a further IVF attempt. The IVF outcomes were compared in women without signs of CE (Group 1) and persistent CE (Group 2) after antibiotic treatment. Clinical pregnancy rate (PR), and live birth rate (LBR) were compared at post-treatment IVF attempt. Seventy (66.0%) women were diagnosed with CE at hysteroscopy. In 61 (57.5%) CE was confirmed by histology and 48 (45.0%) by cultures. Common bacteria and mycoplasma were the most prevalent agents. In 46 (75.4%) out of 61 women, with diagnosis of CE at hysteroscopy and histology, examinations were normal after appropriate antibiotic treatment control (Group 1) while in 15 (24.6%) cases signs of CE were still present (Group 2). At IVF attempt after treatment, a significantly higher PR and LBR was reported in women from Group 1 compared with women from Group 2 (65.2 versus 33.0% P = 0.039; 60.8 versus 13.3%, P = 0.02, respectively). Possible biases related to retrospective studies and to preferential referral of patients with CE, and limited number of cases. A prospective randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm our findings but in women with RIF a hysteroscopic evaluation of the uterine cavity to exclude CE should be considered and appropriate antibiotic treatment should be given before submitting the patient to a further IVF attempt. This research was funded by the University personal research grants of Ettore Cicinelli. The authors have no competing interests to declare.

BACKGROUND: At fluid hysteroscopy the presence of endometrial micropolyps (less than 1 mm of size) is a frequent finding. Although their origin is still unknown, in our experience they are associated with stromal edema, endometrial thickening and periglandular hyperhaemia that suggest the existence of chronic endometritis. This study will aim to describe these lesions and evaluate their inflammatory significance by comparing hysteroscopic and histological findings. METHODS: 820 women underwent hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of the micropolyps presence for the diagnosis of chronic endometritis were calculated. RESULTS: Micropolyps were found in 96 cases (11.7% of all hysteroscopies); in 90 (93.7%) of these cases histology confirmed the presence of chronic endometritis. In women without micropolyps, chronic endometritis was significantly less frequent (78 cases, 10.8%) (P<0.000001). The likelihood of chronic endometritis for women with micropolyps was very high (odds ratio 124.2, confidence interval 50.3–205.4). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 54%, 99%, 94% and 89%, respectively; the diagnostic accuracy was 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of endometrial micropolyps at fluid hysteroscopy is significantly associated with endometrial inflammation and can be considered a reliable diagnostic sign for this pathology.

To assess the usefulness of transabdominal sonohysterography in the diagnosis and evaluation of submucous myomas. Fifty-two premenopausal women hospitalized for hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications underwent preoperative conventional transvaginal sonography, transabdominal sonohysterography, and hysteroscopy. The results of the three techniques in terms of diagnosis, size, intracavitary growth, and location of the submucous myomas were compared with those revealed by direct inspection of the surgical specimens. Conventional transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of submucous myomas had a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 98%; the predictive values of abnormal and normal scans were 90 and 98%, respectively. Transabdominal sonohysterography had sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of 100%, as did hysteroscopy. In all cases, the sonographic techniques measured tumor size more accurately than did hysteroscopy. The transabdominal sonohysterography measurements differed from direct evaluation by no more than 2 mm, and the hysteroscopic measurements were significantly different from those of the surgical specimens. The sonohysterographic evaluation of intrauterine growth was significantly more precise than that of the other techniques, differing from direct measurements by no more than 5-10%. Conventional transvaginal sonography failed to localize three of 11 myomas; hysteroscopy and transabdominal sonohysterography provided the exact location in all cases. Transabdominal sonohysterography is the most accurate technique for detecting submucous myomas and evaluating their size, intracavitary growth, and location.