Fang Li

Prof. Dr. Fang Li

Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2020 in Marine Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Fang LiFang Li
Fang Li
MKMihkel Kõrgesaar
Mihkel Kõrgesaar
PKPentti Kujala
Pentti Kujala
FGFloris Goerlandt
Floris Goerlandt

27 March 2024 in Ocean Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Fang LiFang Li
Fang Li
JCJiyuan Chen
Jiyuan Chen
LZLi Zhou
Li Zhou
Pentti KUJALAPentti KUJALA
Pentti KUJALA

1 May 2020 in Marine Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YXYing Xu
Ying Xu
PKPentti Kujala
Pentti Kujala
ZHZhiqiang Hu
Zhiqiang Hu
Fang LiFang Li
Fang Li
GCGang Chen
Gang Chen

1 November 2024 in Marine Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJiaming Chen
Jiaming Chen
Li ZhouLi Zhou
Li Zhou
Ding ShifengDing Shifeng
Ding Shifeng
Fang LiFang Li
Fang Li

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Fang LiFang Li
Fang Li
Luofeng HuangLuofeng Huang
Luofeng Huang
Apart from breaking level ice, polar ships can interact with broken ice in various scenarios. In recent years, computational simulation models have increasingly been used for the evaluation of ship operability under broken ice conditions, presenting some challenging issues. This paper reviews existing simulation methods used to estimate ship performance and ice loads for ships advancing continuously in broken ice fields. Models for different types of broken ice, including ice floes, ice ridges, brash ice, and sliding ice pieces, are reviewed separately. A ship’s response in broken ice is divided into two categories: resistance, which relates to the overall ship performance, and local loads, which relates to structural safety. This review shows that most existing models are proposed for unbreakable ice particles, which are only applicable to broken ice of small size; most models treat fluid flow with extensive simplification, which does not reflect the influence of a ship’s wake or bow waves, and most models are aimed at resistance estimation, adopting elastic or viscoelastic contact models which do not include ice crushing. As for future work, it is suggested that more effort should be assigned to simulating a ship’s interaction with ice ridges and sliding ice pieces, the modelling of breakable ice floes, and the coupling of the Discrete Element Method (DEM) and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). More attention to the local ice load estimation is also encouraged.

1 July 2018 in Cold Regions Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Fang LiFang Li
Fang Li
FGFloris Goerlandt
Floris Goerlandt
PKPentti Kujala
Pentti Kujala
JLJonni Lehtiranta
Jonni Lehtiranta
MLMikko Lensu
Mikko Lensu