The present paper addresses a thematic of interest in preventive dental medicine, namely the possibility of using essential oils (EOs) for the inhibition of the development of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) in the oral cavity, as a viable alternative to chemical products with protective role in oral health. For this purpose, four EOs (cinnamon, clove, bergamote, and orange) were chemically characterized by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and in vitro tested against S. mutans (ATCC 25175). The results obtained revealed the antibacterial effect on S. mutans exercised by the essential oils of clove (CLEO), bergamote (BEO), and orange (OEO), which were included in the production of natural emulsion-type preparations with application in dental medicine. In order to highlight the synersistic/antagonistic effects generated by the chemical constituent of essential oils, binary and tertiary emulsions were prepared and used in saliva-enhanced medium against S. mutans. The saliva tests proved the synergistic effect exercised by the active components of EOs tested from tertiary emulsions, which cause an inhibition of the development of S. mutans in oral cavities.

The use of natural products as alternatives to traditional pharmacological treatments in orthodontics is gaining interest due to their anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antioxidant properties. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of natural products in reducing inflammation and bacterial presence in orthodontic and orthognathic treatment settings. The database search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Embase up to January 2024. The review focused on randomized controlled trials only. The selected studies centered on the anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antioxidant effects of natural products, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for data extraction. Nine studies, totaling 358 participants, were included. Significant findings demonstrated a reduction in gingival inflammation by over 40% with the use of Aloe vera compared to chlorhexidine. Another study noted a decrease in bleeding on probing by 13.6 points in the treatment group over placebo. Additionally, honey showed a rapid modulation of plaque pH and significantly reduced bacterial counts of Streptococcus mutans. Furthermore, the use of resveratrol emulgel was linked to substantial improvements in gingival health, with a reduction in the gingival index and probing pocket depth. The results indicate that natural products can significantly enhance orthodontic treatment outcomes by reducing inflammation and bacterial levels. These products offer effective alternatives to traditional treatments and show potential for integration into routine orthodontic care protocols. Further research is encouraged to standardize application methods and dosages to maximize clinical benefits and patient satisfaction.

This study aims to compare the diagnostic reliability of ICDAS-II visual criteria, light-induced fluorescence (using the VistaCam iX, Dürr Dental, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany), and laser-induced fluorescence (using the DIAGNOdent Pen, KaVo, Biberach, Germany) on occlusal caries. Permanent and temporary molars were selected according to the inclusion criteria. Out of 160 teeth that met the inclusion criteria, 139 were chosen and examined by two previously trained and calibrated examiners. The kappa value was 0.95 for both VistaCam iX and DIAGNOdent Pen. Results from visual examination and the readings of the two fluorescence devices were computed, lesions being divided into non-cavitated, enamel lesions, and lesions extended to dentin. All statistical analyses were performed using R (version 4.2.2). Spearman’s rank correlation was computed to assess the relationship between the scores of diagnostics reliabilities of the three methods mentioned above. There was a positive, statistically significant Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, ρ = 0.25, between VistaCam iX and ICDAS II, and a positive, not statistically significant Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, ρ = 0.11, between DiagnoDent Pen and ICDAS II. Considering the temporary teeth, there was a positive, statistically significant Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, ρ = 0.52, between VistaCam iX and DiagnoDent Pen; a positive, statistically significant Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, ρ = 0.35, between VistaCam iX and ICDAS II; and the lowest, not statistically significant Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, ρ = 0.16, between DiagnoDent Pen and ICDAS II. Conclusions: In conclusion, ICDAS II and light-induced fluorescence are better diagnostic methods than the laser-induced fluorescence devices for detecting occlusal caries. Clinical Significance: This study may support clinicians in selecting the most efficient tool for diagnosing carious lesion in the earliest stages possible. Furthermore, such technologies raise the availability for more preventive approaches, as opposed to invasive procedures.

Background/Objectives: Oral cancer ranks among the top ten cancers globally, with a five-year survival rate below 50%. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of autofluorescence-guided surgery compared to standard surgical methods in identifying tumor-free margins and ensuring complete excision. Methods: A prospective cohort of 80 patients was randomized into two groups: the control group underwent excision with a 10 mm margin based on clinical judgment, while the experimental group used autofluorescence guidance with a 5 mm margin beyond fluorescence visualization loss. Autofluorescence imaging was performed using the OralID device, which employs a 405 nm excitation laser to detect abnormal tissue. Ethical approval was obtained from the “Spitalul Clinic Municipal de Urgență Timișoara” Ethics Committee (approval number 08/26.02.2021), and the trial was registered at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara (trial no. 59/25.11.2021). A double analysis was conducted: a primary analysis of the full cohort and a subgroup analysis focusing on squamous cell carcinoma (control: n = 19; experimental: n = 24). Histopathological analysis was the gold standard for margin evaluation, with margins coded as tumor-free margins (0), close (1), or infiltrated (2). Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in tumor-free margins between the control (73.17%) and experimental (97%) groups (p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis for SCC showed no significant difference (control: 84.21%; experimental: 95.83%; p = 0.306). Tumor location also differed significantly (p = 0.011), while other baseline variables, such as tumor type and patient characteristics, showed no significant differences. Conclusions: Autofluorescence-guided surgery improves the detection of tumor-free margins and may serve as an effective adjunct in oral cancer management. Larger studies are recommended to confirm these findings.

In vitro studies have shown that rapid penetration of bacteria in the entire root canal system may occur after endodontic treatment without a coronal seal. A proper restorative technique is necessary to ensure a coronal seal and protection of the residual dental structure. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the coronal sealing ability of the most relevant clinical materials by means of dye penetration (neutral red dye, Sigma‐Aldrich, Germany), through a light spectrometric device, and to establish which one of the tested dental materials possesses the best sealing ability. Forty‐two extracted teeth were prepared and used for this experiment; they were sealed with 5 different cements. The flow composite had the best absorbance value with 0.00675 ± 0.00096 (mean ± standard deviation) for monoradicular samples and 0.025 ± 0.00129 for pluriradicular samples. Under the constraints of the present study, both flowable and packable composite materials can be recommended as orifice sealing materials to prevent microleakage in an endodontically treated tooth. To assess the clinical superiority of any material, further in vivo studies are required.

Background and Objectives: Odontogenic infections (OIs) can lead to severe complications if not promptly diagnosed and treated. The Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (dNLR); Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS); and Predisposition, Infection, Response, and Organ Dysfunction (PIRO) scores are clinical tools used to predict the severity and outcomes in various infections. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of these scores in predicting the severity of OIs in adult patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 120 patients hospitalized for OIs, divided into two groups based on infection severity, using the Symptom Severity (SS) scale. The qSOFA, dNLR, MEWS, and PIRO scores were calculated upon admission. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the predictive value of these scores for severe OIs. Results: Patients with severe OIs (Group B) had significantly higher qSOFA, dNLR, MEWS, and PIRO scores compared to those with lower severity (Group A). The median qSOFA score was 2.00 in Group B versus 0.85 in Group A. No significant difference was observed between young patients and adults in terms of severity. ROC curve analysis showed that the PIRO score had the highest predictive value for severe OI (AUC = 0.912), followed by MEWS (AUC = 0.878), qSOFA (AUC = 0.845), and dNLR (AUC = 0.812). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that the PIRO score was an independent predictor of severe OI (OR = 8.45, 95% CI: 4.12–12.78). Conclusions: The qSOFA, dNLR, MEWS, and PIRO scores are valuable tools for predicting the severity of OIs. Among them, the PIRO score demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy and may be incorporated into clinical practice for early identification of high-risk patients.