Mark Jessopp

Dr. Mark Jessopp

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 July 2013 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EWEwan D. Wakefield
Ewan D. Wakefield
TBThomas W. Bodey
Thomas W. Bodey
SBStuart Bearhop
Stuart Bearhop
JBJez Blackburn
Jez Blackburn
KCKendrew Colhoun
Kendrew Colhoun
KHKeith C. Hamer
Keith C. Hamer
This Is the Place: Bats, bees, seals, and many seabirds practice central-place foraging, leaving a central home site, such as a hive or a rookery, to forage in a specific territory. Such species also share the challenge of competing for local resources with individuals from separate colonies. Using satellite tags, Wakefield et al. (p. 68 , published online 6 June; see the Perspective by Weimerskirch ) followed over 180 northern gannets to determine potential drivers of foraging territory division. Boundaries among colonial territories arose as a result of competition with individuals from other territories. Individuals from the same colony appeared to share information about foraging sites, presumably contributing to the establishment and maintenance of specific, long-term colonial territories.

1 May 2009 in Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAA. Atkinson
A. Atkinson
VSV. Siegel
V. Siegel
EPE.A. Pakhomov
E.A. Pakhomov
MJMark Jessopp
Mark Jessopp
VLV. Loeb
V. Loeb

20 October 2023 in Ibis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JLJude V. Lane
Jude V. Lane
JJJana W.E. Jeglinski
Jana W.E. Jeglinski
SAStephanie Avery‐Gomm
Stephanie Avery‐Gomm
EBElmar Ballstaedt
Elmar Ballstaedt
ABAshley C Banyard
Ashley C Banyard
SVStephen C. Votier
Stephen C. Votier
During 2021 and 2022 High Pathogenicity Avian Influenza (HPAI) killed thousands of wild birds across Europe and North America, suggesting a change in infection dynamics and a shift to new hosts, including seabirds. Northern Gannets Morus bassanus appeared to be especially severely impacted, but a detailed account of the data available is required to help understand how the HPAI virus (HPAIV) spread across the meta‐population, and the ensuing demographic consequences. Accordingly, we analyse information on confirmed and suspected HPAIV outbreaks across most North Atlantic Gannet colonies and, for the largest colony (Bass Rock, UK), provide impacts on population size, breeding success, and preliminary results on apparent adult survival and serology. Unusually high numbers of dead Gannets were first noted at colonies in Iceland during April 2022. Outbreaks in May occurred in many Scottish colonies, followed by colonies in Canada, Germany and Norway. By the end of June, outbreaks had occurred in colonies in Canada and the English Channel. Outbreaks in 12 UK and Ireland colonies appeared to follow a clockwise pattern with the last infected colonies recorded in late August/September. Unusually high mortality was recorded at 40 colonies (75% of global total colonies). Dead birds testing positive for HPAIV H5N1 were associated with 58% of these colonies. At Bass Rock, the number of occupied nest‐sites decreased by at least 71%, breeding success declined by c. 66% compared with the long‐term UK mean and the resighting of marked individuals suggested that apparent adult survival between 2021 and 2022 could have been substantially lower than the preceding 10‐year average. Serological investigation detected antibodies specific to H5 in apparently healthy birds, indicating that some Gannets recover from HPAIV infection. Further, most of these recovered birds had black irises, suggestive of a phenotypic indicator of previous infection. Untangling the impacts of HPAIV infection from other challenges faced by seabirds is key to establishing effective conservation strategies for threatened seabird populations as the likelihood of further epizootics increases, due to increasing habitat loss and the industrialization of poultry production.

16 March 2017 in Earth System Science Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAngus Atkinson
Angus Atkinson
SHSimeon L. Hill
Simeon L. Hill
EPEvgeny A. Pakhomov
Evgeny A. Pakhomov
VSVolker Siegel
Volker Siegel
RARicardo Anadon
Ricardo Anadon
PWPeter Ward
Peter Ward
Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) and salps are major macroplankton contributors to Southern Ocean food webs and krill are also fished commercially. Managing this fishery sustainably, against a backdrop of rapid regional climate change, requires information on distribution and time trends. Many data on the abundance of both taxa have been obtained from net sampling surveys since 1926, but much of this is stored in national archives, sometimes only in notebooks. In order to make these important data accessible we have collated available abundance data (numerical density, no. m−2) of postlarval E. superba and salp individual (multiple species, and whether singly or in chains). These were combined into a central database, KRILLBASE, together with environmental information, standardisation and metadata. The aim is to provide a temporal-spatial data resource to support a variety of research such as biogeochemistry, autecology, higher predator foraging and food web modelling in addition to fisheries management and conservation. Previous versions of KRILLBASE have led to a series of papers since 2004 which illustrate some of the potential uses of this database. With increasing numbers of requests for these data we here provide an updated version of KRILLBASE that contains data from 15 194 net hauls, including 12 758 with krill abundance data and 9726 with salp abundance data. These data were collected by 10 nations and span 56 seasons in two epochs (1926–1939 and 1976–2016). Here, we illustrate the seasonal, inter-annual, regional and depth coverage of sampling, and provide both circumpolar- and regional-scale distribution maps. Krill abundance data have been standardised to accommodate variation in sampling methods, and we have presented these as well as the raw data. Information is provided on how to screen, interpret and use KRILLBASE to reduce artefacts in interpretation, with contact points for the main data providers. The DOI for the published data set is doi:10.5285/8b00a915-94e3-4a04-a903-dd4956346439.

4 July 2023 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BCBethany L. Clark
Bethany L. Clark
ACAna P. B. Carneiro
Ana P. B. Carneiro
EPElizabeth J. Pearmain
Elizabeth J. Pearmain
MRMarie-Morgane Rouyer
Marie-Morgane Rouyer
TCThomas A. Clay
Thomas A. Clay
MDMaria P. Dias
Maria P. Dias
Plastic pollution is distributed patchily around the world’s oceans. Likewise, marine organisms that are vulnerable to plastic ingestion or entanglement have uneven distributions. Understanding where wildlife encounters plastic is crucial for targeting research and mitigation. Oceanic seabirds, particularly petrels, frequently ingest plastic, are highly threatened, and cover vast distances during foraging and migration. However, the spatial overlap between petrels and plastics is poorly understood. Here we combine marine plastic density estimates with individual movement data for 7137 birds of 77 petrel species to estimate relative exposure risk. We identify high exposure risk areas in the Mediterranean and Black seas, and the northeast Pacific, northwest Pacific, South Atlantic and southwest Indian oceans. Plastic exposure risk varies greatly among species and populations, and between breeding and non-breeding seasons. Exposure risk is disproportionately high for Threatened species. Outside the Mediterranean and Black seas, exposure risk is highest in the high seas and Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of the USA, Japan, and the UK. Birds generally had higher plastic exposure risk outside the EEZ of the country where they breed. We identify conservation and research priorities, and highlight that international collaboration is key to addressing the impacts of marine plastic on wide-ranging species.

26 October 2019 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JWJames J. Waggitt
James J. Waggitt
PEPeter G. H. Evans
Peter G. H. Evans
JAJoana Andrade
Joana Andrade
ABAlex N. Banks
Alex N. Banks
OBOliver Boisseau
Oliver Boisseau
OOO. O’cadhla
O. O’cadhla