Dara Goldberg

Dr. Dara Goldberg

University of Oregon, 100 Cascade Hall, 1272 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2023 in The Seismic Record
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dara GoldbergDara Goldberg
Dara Goldberg
TTTuncay Taymaz
Tuncay Taymaz
NRNadine G. Reitman
Nadine G. Reitman
AHAlexandra E. Hatem
Alexandra E. Hatem
SYSeda Yolsal-Çevikbilen
Seda Yolsal-Çevikbilen
CACemali Altuntas
Cemali Altuntas
The 6 February 2023 Mw 7.8 Pazarcık and subsequent Mw 7.5 Elbistan earthquakes generated strong ground shaking that resulted in catastrophic human and economic loss across south‐central Türkiye and northwest Syria. The rapid characterization of the earthquakes, including their location, size, fault geometries, and slip kinematics, is critical to estimate the impact of significant seismic events. The U.S. Geological Survey National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC) provides real‐time monitoring of earthquakes globally, including rapid source characterization and impact estimates. Here, we describe the seismic characterization products generated and made available by the NEIC over the two weeks following the start of the earthquake sequence in southeast Türkiye, their evolution, and how they inform our understanding of regional seismotectonics and hazards. The kinematics of rupture for the two earthquakes was complex, involving multiple fault segments. Therefore, incorporating observations from rupture mapping was critical for characterizing these events. Dense local datasets facilitated robust source characterization and impact assessment once these observations were obtained and converted to NEIC product input formats. We discuss how we may improve the timeliness of NEIC products for rapid assessment of future seismic hazards, particularly in the case of complex ruptures.

10 February 2020 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dara GoldbergDara Goldberg
Dara Goldberg
DMD. Melgar
D. Melgar
VSV. J. Sahakian
V. J. Sahakian
ATA. M. Thomas
A. M. Thomas
XXX. Xu
X. Xu
Jianghui GengJianghui Geng
Jianghui Geng
The 4 July 2019 Mw6.4 and subsequent 6 July 2019 Mw7.1 Ridgecrest sequence earthquakes (CA, USA) ruptured orthogonal fault planes in a low slip rate (1 mm/year) dextral fault zone in the area linking the Eastern California Shear Zone and Walker Lane. This region accommodates nearly one fourth of plate boundary motion and has been proposed to be an incipient transform fault system that could eventually become the main tectonic boundary, replacing the San Andreas Fault. We investigate the rupture process of these events using a novel simultaneous kinematic slip method with joint inversion of high‐rate GNSS, strong motion, GNSS static offset, and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar data. We model the Coulomb stress change to evaluate how the Mw6.4 earthquake may have affected the subsequent Mw7.1 event. Our findings suggest complex interactions between several fault structures, including dynamic and static triggering, and provide important context for regional seismic source characterization and hazard models.

31 October 2018 in Seismological Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CRChristine J. Ruhl
Christine J. Ruhl
DMDiego Melgar
Diego Melgar
Jianghui GengJianghui Geng
Jianghui Geng
Dara GoldbergDara Goldberg
Dara Goldberg
BCBrendan W. Crowell
Brendan W. Crowell
Elisabetta D’AnastasioElisabetta D’Anastasio
Elisabetta D’Anastasio
Displacement waveforms derived from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data have become more commonly used by seismologists in the past 15 yrs. Unlike strong‐motion accelerometer recordings that are affected by baseline offsets during very strong shaking, GNSS data record displacement with fidelity down to 0 Hz. Unfortunately, fully processed GNSS waveform data are still scarce because of limited public availability and the highly technical nature of GNSS processing. In an effort to further the use and adoption of high‐rate (HR) GNSS for earthquake seismology, ground‐motion studies, and structural monitoring applications, we describe and make available a database of fully curated HR‐GNSS displacement waveforms for significant earthquakes. We include data from HR‐GNSS networks at near‐source to regional distances (1–1000 km) for 29 earthquakes between Mw 6.0 and 9.0 worldwide. As a demonstration of the utility of this dataset, we model the magnitude scaling properties of peak ground displacements (PGDs) for these events. In addition to tripling the number of earthquakes used in previous PGD scaling studies, the number of data points over a range of distances and magnitudes is dramatically increased. The data are made available as a compressed archive with the article.

4 August 2022 in Seismological Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Dara GoldbergDara Goldberg
Dara Goldberg
PKPablo Koch
Pablo Koch
DMDiego Melgar
Diego Melgar
SRSebastian Riquelme
Sebastian Riquelme
WYWilliam L. Yeck
William L. Yeck
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC) routinely produces finite‐fault models following significant earthquakes. These models are spatiotemporal estimates of coseismic slip critical to constraining downstream response products such as ShakeMap ground motion estimates, Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquake for Response loss estimates, and ground failure assessments. Because large earthquakes can involve slip over tens to hundreds of kilometers, point‐source approximations are insufficient, and it is vital to rapidly assess the amount, timing, and location of slip along the fault. Initially, the USGS finite‐fault products were computed in the first several hours after a significant earthquake, using teleseismic body wave and surface wave observations. With only teleseismic waveforms, it is generally possible to obtain a reliable model for earthquakes of magnitude 7 and larger. Here, we detail newly implemented updates to NEIC’s modeling capabilities, specifically to allow joint modeling of local‐to‐regional strong‐motion accelerometer, Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) observations in addition to teleseismic waveforms. We present joint inversion results for the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel, Chile, earthquake, to confirm the method’s reliability. Next, we provide examples from recent earthquakes: the 29 July 2021 Mw 8.2 Chignik, Alaska, United States, the 14 August 2021 Mw 7.2 Nippes, Haiti, and the 8 July 2021 Mw 6.0 Antelope Valley, California, United States, earthquakes. These examples confirm that jointly leveraging a variety of geophysical datasets improves the reliability of the slip model and demonstrate that such a combination can be leveraged for rapid response. The inclusion of these new datasets allows for more consistent finite‐fault modeling of earthquakes as small as magnitude 6. As accelerometer, GNSS, and InSAR observations worldwide become more accessible, these joint models will become more routine, providing improved resolution and spatiotemporal constraints on rapid finite‐fault models, and thereby improving the estimates of downstream earthquake response products.

1 October 2023 in The Seismic Record
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WYWilliam L. Yeck
William L. Yeck
AHAlexandra E. Hatem
Alexandra E. Hatem
Dara GoldbergDara Goldberg
Dara Goldberg
WBWilliam D. Barnhart
William D. Barnhart
JJJessica A. Thompson Jobe
Jessica A. Thompson Jobe
PEPaul S. Earle
Paul S. Earle
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC) estimates source characteristics of significant damaging earthquakes, aiming to place events within their seismotectonic framework. Contextualizing the 8 September 2023, Mw 6.8 Al Haouz, Morocco, earthquake is challenging, because it occurred in an enigmatic region of active surface faulting, and low seismicity yet produced significant damage and loss of life. Here, we present the rapid earthquake source products produced by the USGS NEIC, describing how the source model was derived using both seismic and geodetic observations. Our analysis indicates that the earthquake was the result of oblique‐reverse faulting in the lower crust on either a steeply north‐dipping fault or a moderately south‐dipping fault. Finite‐slip models using seismic and geodetic data reveal a compact source, with slip occurring at depths of 15–35 km. The causative fault is not apparent, because the rupture did not break the surface, and it is not possible to definitively attribute the earthquake to a known structure. The earthquake centroid depth of 25 km is noteworthy, because it shows slip extending beyond common estimates of seismogenic depth. This earthquake highlights that the seismogenic processes associated with mountain building in this wide plate boundary region are poorly understood.

8 November 2016 in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJessie K. Saunders
Jessie K. Saunders
Dara GoldbergDara Goldberg
Dara Goldberg
JHJennifer S. Haase
Jennifer S. Haase
YBYehuda Bock
Yehuda Bock
DOD. Glen Offield
D. Glen Offield
GMGlen Mattioli
Glen Mattioli