Joep van der Zanden

Dr. Joep van der Zanden

Maritime Research Institute Netherlands
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2017 in Coastal Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JZJoep van der Zanden
Joep van der Zanden
DAD.A. van der A
D.A. van der A
DHD. Hurther
D. Hurther
ICI. Cáceres
I. Cáceres
TOT. O’donoghue
T. O’donoghue
JRJ.S. Ribberink
J.S. Ribberink

24 April 2017 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VAvan der A
van der A
DADominic A.
Dominic A.
JZJoep van der Zanden
Joep van der Zanden
TOTom O'Donoghue
Tom O'Donoghue
DHDavid Hurther
David Hurther
JRJan S. Ribberink
Jan S. Ribberink
A large‐scale wave flume experiment has been carried out involving a T = 4 s regular wave with H = 0.85 m wave height plunging over a fixed barred beach profile. Velocity profiles were measured at 12 locations along the breaker bar using LDA and ADV. A strong undertow is generated reaching magnitudes of 0.8 m/s on the shoreward side of the breaker bar. A circulation pattern occurs between the breaking area and the inner surf zone. Time‐averaged turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) is largest in the breaking area on the shoreward side of the bar where the plunging jet penetrates the water column. At this location, and on the bar crest, TKE generated at the water surface in the breaking process reaches the bottom boundary layer. In the breaking area, TKE does not reduce to zero within a wave cycle which leads to a high level of “residual” turbulence and therefore lower temporal variation in TKE compared to previous studies of breaking waves on plane beach slopes. It is argued that this residual turbulence results from the breaker bar‐trough geometry, which enables larger length scales and time scales of breaking‐generated vortices and which enhances turbulence production within the water column compared to plane beaches. Transport of TKE is dominated by the undertow‐related flux, whereas the wave‐related and turbulent fluxes are approximately an order of magnitude smaller. Turbulence production and dissipation are largest in the breaker zone and of similar magnitude, but in the shoaling zone and inner surf zone production is negligible and dissipation dominates.

31 August 2016 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJoep van der Zanden
Joep van der Zanden
VAvan der A
van der A
DAD. A.
D. A.
DHD. Hurther
D. Hurther
ICI. Cáceres
I. Cáceres
JRJ. S. Ribberink
J. S. Ribberink
Detailed measurements are presented of velocities and turbulence under a large‐scale regular plunging breaking wave in a wave flume. Measurements were obtained at 12 cross‐shore locations around a mobile medium‐sand breaker bar. They focused particularly on the dynamics of the wave bottom boundary layer (WBL) and near‐bed turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), measured with an Acoustic Concentration and Velocity Profiler (ACVP). The breaking process and outer flow hydrodynamics are in agreement with previous laboratory and field observations of plunging waves, including a strong undertow in the bar trough region. The WBL thickness matches with previous studies at locations offshore from the bar crest, but it increases near the breaking‐wave plunge point. This relates possibly to breaking‐induced TKE or to the diverging flow at the shoreward slope of the bar. Outer flow TKE is dominated by wave breaking and exhibits strong spatial variation with largest TKE above the breaker bar crest. Below the plunge point, breaking‐induced turbulence invades the WBL during both crest and trough half cycle. This results in an increase in the time‐averaged TKE in the WBL (with a factor 3) and an increase in peak onshore and offshore near‐bed Reynolds stresses (with a factor 2) from shoaling to breaking region. A fraction of locally produced TKE is advected offshore over a distance of a few meters to shoaling locations during the wave trough phase, and travels back onshore during the crest half cycle. The results imply that breaking‐induced turbulence, for large‐scale conditions, may significantly affect near‐bed sediment transport processes.

1 October 2018 in Coastal Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJosé M. Alsina
José M. Alsina
JZJoep van der Zanden
Joep van der Zanden
ICIván Cáceres
Iván Cáceres
JRJan S. Ribberink
Jan S. Ribberink

1 November 2017 in Coastal Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JZJoep van der Zanden
Joep van der Zanden
DAD.A. van der A
D.A. van der A
DHD. Hurther
D. Hurther
ICI. Cáceres
I. Cáceres
TOT. O'Donoghue
T. O'Donoghue
JRJ.S. Ribberink
J.S. Ribberink

1 November 2015 in Coastal Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JZJoep van der Zanden
Joep van der Zanden
JAJosé M. Alsina
José M. Alsina
ICIvan Caceres
Ivan Caceres
RBRené H. Buijsrogge
René H. Buijsrogge
JRJan S. Ribberink
Jan S. Ribberink