This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.
As an active form of meeting, walking meetings can be beneficial for office workers who often have a sedentary work routine. Despite their substantial benefits in terms of health, social interactions, and creativity, walking meetings are not yet widely adopted. Some key barriers limiting their social acceptance and wider adoption, for instance, the difficulty to present files or take notes, might be addressed by technology. Using the Hubs - a network of stand-up meeting stations - as a design exemplar, we conducted a scenario-based survey (N = 186) to provide insights into how technological solutions can support the practice of walking meetings. Focusing on the size of the group and type of meetings, we identify scenarios of use and discuss design implications for the development of future technologies and service design components to support walking meetings.
Ida Damen; Steven Vos; Carine Lallemand. The Hubs: Design Insights for Walking Meeting Technology. Quantitative Evaluation of Systems 2021, 610 -629.
AMA StyleIda Damen, Steven Vos, Carine Lallemand. The Hubs: Design Insights for Walking Meeting Technology. Quantitative Evaluation of Systems. 2021; ():610-629.
Chicago/Turabian StyleIda Damen; Steven Vos; Carine Lallemand. 2021. "The Hubs: Design Insights for Walking Meeting Technology." Quantitative Evaluation of Systems , no. : 610-629.
Physical inactivity has become a major public health concern and, consequently, the awareness of striving for a healthy lifestyle has increased. As a result, the popularity of recreational sports, such as running, has increased. Running is known for its low threshold to start and its attractiveness for a heterogeneous group of people. Yet, one can still observe high drop-out rates among (novice) runners. To understand the reasons for drop-out as perceived by runners, we investigate potential reasons to quit running among short distance runners (5 km and 10 km) (n = 898). Data used in this study were drawn from the standardized online Eindhoven Running Survey 2016 (ERS16). Binary logistic regressions were used to investigate the relation between reasons to quit running and different variables like socio-demographic variables, running habits and attitudes, interests, and opinions (AIOs) on running. Our results indicate that, not only people of different gender and age show significant differences in perceived reasons to quit running, also running habits, (e.g., running context and frequency) and AIOs are related to perceived reasons to quit running too. With insights into these related variables, potential drop-out reasons could help health professionals in understanding and lowering drop-out rates among recreational runners.
Daphne Menheere; Mark Janssen; Mathias Funk; Erik Van Der Spek; Carine Lallemand; Steven Vos. Runner’s Perceptions of Reasons to Quit Running: Influence of Gender, Age and Running-Related Characteristics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020, 17, 6046 .
AMA StyleDaphne Menheere, Mark Janssen, Mathias Funk, Erik Van Der Spek, Carine Lallemand, Steven Vos. Runner’s Perceptions of Reasons to Quit Running: Influence of Gender, Age and Running-Related Characteristics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17 (17):6046.
Chicago/Turabian StyleDaphne Menheere; Mark Janssen; Mathias Funk; Erik Van Der Spek; Carine Lallemand; Steven Vos. 2020. "Runner’s Perceptions of Reasons to Quit Running: Influence of Gender, Age and Running-Related Characteristics." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 17: 6046.
Among runners, there is a high drop-out rate due to injuries and loss of motivation. These runners often lack personalized guidance and support. While there is much potential for sports apps to act as (e-)coaches to help these runners to avoid injuries, set goals, and maintain good intentions, most available running apps primarily focus on persuasive design features like monitoring, they offer few or no features that support personalized guidance (e.g., personalized training schemes). Therefore, we give a detailed description of the working mechanism of Inspirun e-Coach app and on how this app uses a personalized coaching approach with automatic adaptation of training schemes based on biofeedback and GPS-data. We also share insights into how end-users experience this working mechanism. The primary conclusion of this study is that the working mechanism (if provided with accurate data) automatically adapts training sessions to the runners’ physical workload and stimulates runners’ goal perception, motivation, and experienced personalization. With this mechanism, we attempted to make optimal use of the potential of wearable technology to support the large group of novice or less experienced runners and that by providing insight in our working mechanisms, it can be applied in other technologies, wearables, and types of sports.
Mark Janssen; Jos Goudsmit; Coen Lauwerijssen; Aarnout Brombacher; Carine Lallemand; Steven Vos. How Do Runners Experience Personalization of Their Training Scheme: The Inspirun E-Coach? Sensors 2020, 20, 4590 .
AMA StyleMark Janssen, Jos Goudsmit, Coen Lauwerijssen, Aarnout Brombacher, Carine Lallemand, Steven Vos. How Do Runners Experience Personalization of Their Training Scheme: The Inspirun E-Coach? Sensors. 2020; 20 (16):4590.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMark Janssen; Jos Goudsmit; Coen Lauwerijssen; Aarnout Brombacher; Carine Lallemand; Steven Vos. 2020. "How Do Runners Experience Personalization of Their Training Scheme: The Inspirun E-Coach?" Sensors 20, no. 16: 4590.
Background: There is increasing interest in the role that technology can play in improving the vitality of knowledge workers. A promising and widely adopted strategy to attain this goal is to reduce sedentary behavior (SB) and increase physical activity (PA). In this paper, we review the state-of-the-art SB and PA interventions using technology in the office environment. By scoping the existing landscape, we identified current gaps and underexplored possibilities. We discuss opportunities for future development and research on SB and PA interventions using technology. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the Association for Computing Machinery digital library, the interdisciplinary library Scopus, and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Xplore Digital Library to locate peer-reviewed scientific articles detailing SB and PA technology interventions in office environments between 2009 and 2019. Results: The initial search identified 1130 articles, of which 45 studies were included in the analysis. Our scoping review focused on the technologies supporting the interventions, which were coded using a grounded approach. Conclusion: Our findings showed that current SB and PA interventions using technology provide limited possibilities for physically active ways of working as opposed to the common strategy of prompting breaks. Interventions are also often offered as additional systems or services, rather than integrated into existing office infrastructures. With this work, we have mapped different types of interventions and provide an increased understanding of the opportunities for future multidisciplinary development and research of technologies to address sedentary behavior and physical activity in the office context.
Ida Damen; Hans Brombacher; Carine Lallemand; Rens Brankaert; Aarnout Brombacher; Pieter Van Wesemael; Steven Vos. A Scoping Review of Digital Tools to Reduce Sedentary Behavior or Increase Physical Activity in Knowledge Workers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020, 17, 499 .
AMA StyleIda Damen, Hans Brombacher, Carine Lallemand, Rens Brankaert, Aarnout Brombacher, Pieter Van Wesemael, Steven Vos. A Scoping Review of Digital Tools to Reduce Sedentary Behavior or Increase Physical Activity in Knowledge Workers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17 (2):499.
Chicago/Turabian StyleIda Damen; Hans Brombacher; Carine Lallemand; Rens Brankaert; Aarnout Brombacher; Pieter Van Wesemael; Steven Vos. 2020. "A Scoping Review of Digital Tools to Reduce Sedentary Behavior or Increase Physical Activity in Knowledge Workers." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 2: 499.
Privacy is a timely topic that is increasingly scrutinized in the public eye. In spite of privacy and security breaches, people still frequently compromise their privacy in exchange for certain benefits of a technology or a service. This study builds on both technology acceptance (TA) and User Experience (UX) research in order to explore and build hypotheses regarding additional dimensions that might play a role in the acceptability of privacy tradeoffs that are not currently accounted for in TA models. Using four scenarios describing situations with potential privacy trade-offs, we conducted a focus group study with 8 groups of participants (N = 32). Our results suggest that factors influencing privacy trade-offs go beyond existing TA factors alone. A technology's perceived usefulness plays an important role, as well as dimensions related to context, previous experiences, perceived autonomy and the feeling of control over the data being shared.
Verena Distler; Carine Lallemand; Vincent Koenig. How Acceptable Is This? How User Experience Factors Can Broaden our Understanding of The Acceptance of Privacy Trade-offs. Computers in Human Behavior 2019, 106, 106227 .
AMA StyleVerena Distler, Carine Lallemand, Vincent Koenig. How Acceptable Is This? How User Experience Factors Can Broaden our Understanding of The Acceptance of Privacy Trade-offs. Computers in Human Behavior. 2019; 106 ():106227.
Chicago/Turabian StyleVerena Distler; Carine Lallemand; Vincent Koenig. 2019. "How Acceptable Is This? How User Experience Factors Can Broaden our Understanding of The Acceptance of Privacy Trade-offs." Computers in Human Behavior 106, no. : 106227.
Alors que l’évaluation de l’expérience utilisateur (UX) est au cœur des préoccupations dans le domaine des interactions homme–machine, aucun outil d’évaluation auto-administré valide de l’UX n’existe actuellement en langue française. Le questionnaire AttrakDiff 2 (Hassenzahl, Burmester, & Koller, 2003) est un outil d’évaluation de l’UX qui repose sur un modèle théorique distinguant qualités pragmatiques et qualités hédoniques des systèmes interactifs. Cet article décrit la traduction et la validation de la version française du questionnaire AttrakDiff 2 en vue de son utilisation sur des échantillons de population francophone. Suivant la méthodologie de validation transculturelle proposée par Vallerand (1989), le questionnaire a été traduit par des chercheurs trilingues puis a fait l’objet d’un processus de traduction renversée et d’une validation par un comité d’experts. Un prétest a été effectué sur 26 participants. Les caractéristiques de la version française de l’AttrakDiff 2 ont ensuite été évaluées par une étude quantitative en ligne sur un échantillon de 381 utilisateurs. Les résultats des analyses effectuées confirment la structure factorielle attendue en 3 facteurs et une bonne consistance interne des sous-échelles. Les liens entre les facteurs sont consistants avec le modèle théorique d’Hassenzahl (2003) où attributs pragmatiques et hédoniques perçus se combinent pour former un jugement d’attractivité. La présente version française de l’AttrakDiff 2 est globalement conforme à la version initiale allemande de l’outil et présente des niveaux de validité et de fidélité satisfaisants. While user experience (UX) evaluation is a core concern within the field of human–computer interaction (HCI), there is currently no valid self-administered UX evaluation tool in French. The AttrakDiff 2 scale (Hassenzahl, Burmester, & Koller, 2003) is a UX evaluation tool, which relies on a theoretical model distinguishing pragmatic and hedonic qualities of interactive systems. This paper describes the translation and validation of the French version of the AttrakDiff 2 scale in order to ease UX assessment in French-speaking users. Following the cross-cultural methodology developed by Vallerand (1989), the questionnaire was translated by trilingual researchers before being back-translated and validated by a panel of experts. A pre-test was conducted on 26 participants. The characteristics of the French version of the AttrakDiff 2 scale were then evaluated through a quantitative online study involving a sample of 381 users. The results confirm the expected 3 factors structure and a good internal consistency of each subscale. The links between factors are consistent with Hassenzahl's theoretical model (2003) where pragmatic and hedonic perceived attributes combine to form a judgment of attractiveness. The current French version of the AttrakDiff 2 scale is globally reliable with regards to the initial German version and presents satisfactory levels of validity and reliability.
C. Lallemand; V. Koenig; G. Gronier; R. Martin. Création et validation d’une version française du questionnaire AttrakDiff pour l’évaluation de l’expérience utilisateur des systèmes interactifs. European Review of Applied Psychology 2015, 65, 239 -252.
AMA StyleC. Lallemand, V. Koenig, G. Gronier, R. Martin. Création et validation d’une version française du questionnaire AttrakDiff pour l’évaluation de l’expérience utilisateur des systèmes interactifs. European Review of Applied Psychology. 2015; 65 (5):239-252.
Chicago/Turabian StyleC. Lallemand; V. Koenig; G. Gronier; R. Martin. 2015. "Création et validation d’une version française du questionnaire AttrakDiff pour l’évaluation de l’expérience utilisateur des systèmes interactifs." European Review of Applied Psychology 65, no. 5: 239-252.
Carine Lallemand; Guillaume Gronier; Vincent Koenig. User experience: A concept without consensus? Exploring practitioners’ perspectives through an international survey. Computers in Human Behavior 2015, 43, 35 -48.
AMA StyleCarine Lallemand, Guillaume Gronier, Vincent Koenig. User experience: A concept without consensus? Exploring practitioners’ perspectives through an international survey. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015; 43 ():35-48.
Chicago/Turabian StyleCarine Lallemand; Guillaume Gronier; Vincent Koenig. 2015. "User experience: A concept without consensus? Exploring practitioners’ perspectives through an international survey." Computers in Human Behavior 43, no. : 35-48.