This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.
While higher education has been considered as both an ‘engine’ for innovation and a ‘catalyst’ for sustainability development, the integration of both the ‘innovation engine’ and ‘sustainability catalyst’ roles is best reflected in higher education’s engagement in innovation ecosystems—the theme of this special issue, including 16 articles dealing with the topic from various perspectives. In this editorial, we outline an overarching framework about the relations between higher education and innovation ecosystem. When elaborating the framework, we provide a new definition of innovation ecosystem and identify three roles of university in innovation ecosystems, based on synthesizing relevant literature. The framework could facilitate readers to comprehend each of the collected articles and find synergy among them.
Yuzhuo Cai; Jinyuan Ma; Qiongqiong Chen. Higher Education in Innovation Ecosystems. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4376 .
AMA StyleYuzhuo Cai, Jinyuan Ma, Qiongqiong Chen. Higher Education in Innovation Ecosystems. Sustainability. 2020; 12 (11):4376.
Chicago/Turabian StyleYuzhuo Cai; Jinyuan Ma; Qiongqiong Chen. 2020. "Higher Education in Innovation Ecosystems." Sustainability 12, no. 11: 4376.
This study provides an in-depth analysis of the effects of academic mobility on higher education innovation through an empirical study on returned Chinese academics at two research universities in China. Based on data obtained through document analysis and semi-structured interviews with 15 academic returnees, this paper aims to examine the everyday interactions between individual returnees and their environment, with a focus on exploring how different institutional contexts affect returnees’ capacity for integration and innovation. It finds that returned academics play an important role in promoting higher education innovation in China through mobilizing their transnational capital and resources. However, their capacity to innovate is largely subject to their working environment. Evidence from the study suggests that differing institutional contexts make a substantial difference to the reintegration experiences of returnees and to their contributions to institutional changes. This paper provides a window into the changing institutional environment in China and the academic lives of returnees there. It also provides important implications for talent policy decisions.
Qiongqiong Chen; Yuan Li. Mobility, Knowledge Transfer, and Innovation: An Empirical Study on Returned Chinese Academics at Two Research Universities. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6454 .
AMA StyleQiongqiong Chen, Yuan Li. Mobility, Knowledge Transfer, and Innovation: An Empirical Study on Returned Chinese Academics at Two Research Universities. Sustainability. 2019; 11 (22):6454.
Chicago/Turabian StyleQiongqiong Chen; Yuan Li. 2019. "Mobility, Knowledge Transfer, and Innovation: An Empirical Study on Returned Chinese Academics at Two Research Universities." Sustainability 11, no. 22: 6454.