Diğdem Acarel

Dr. Diğdem Acarel


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 November 2023 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GKG. Kwiatek
G. Kwiatek
PGPatricia Martinez Garzon
Patricia Martinez Garzon
DBD. Becker
D. Becker
GDG. Dresen
G. Dresen
FCF. Cotton
F. Cotton
MBM. Bohnhoff
M. Bohnhoff
Short term prediction of earthquake magnitude, time, and location is currently not possible. In some cases, however, documented observations have been retrospectively considered as precursory. Here we present seismicity transients starting approx. 8 months before the 2023 MW 7.8 Kahramanmaraş earthquake on the East Anatolian Fault Zone. Seismicity is composed of isolated spatio-temporal clusters within 65 km of future epicentre, displaying non-Poissonian inter-event time statistics, magnitude correlations and low Gutenberg-Richter b-values. Local comparable seismic transients have not been observed, at least since 2014. Close to epicentre and during the weeks prior to its rupture, only scarce seismic activity was observed. The trends of seismic preparatory attributes for this earthquake follow those previously documented in both laboratory stick-slip tests and numerical models of heterogeneous earthquake rupture affecting multiple fault segments. More comprehensive earthquake monitoring together with long-term seismic records may facilitate recognizing earthquake preparation processes from other regional deformation transients.

31 December 2019 in Open Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DADiğdem Acarel
Diğdem Acarel
MCMusavver Didem Cambaz
Musavver Didem Cambaz
FTFatih Turhan
Fatih Turhan
AMAhu Kömeç Mutlu
Ahu Kömeç Mutlu
RPRemzi Polat
Remzi Polat
Turkey is located in a seismically active region with a complex tectonic history. In order to perform seismic risk assessment precisely, major fault zones (North Anatolian Fault Zone and East Anatolian Fault Zone) that are well defined are monitored continuously. It is a widely known fact that intraplate settings, such as Anatolian Plate, in which devastating earthquakes may occur, need to be observed densely. In this study, we investigate the seismotectonics of Malatya Fault within the Malatya Ovacık Fault Zone (MOFZ), which is one of the major agents responsible for internal deformation acting on Anatolian Plate. Recent geological and paleoseismological studies underline the necessity of comprehending the seismicity and latency of a major earthquake in this fault zone.We applied traditional techniques to investigate data of such a region. Earthquakes that occured in the vicinity of Malatya Fault between the years 2011 and mid-2019 are employed in a detailed analysis. The results of this study are constrained by the distribution of sensor networks in the region, yet allowing to define an active structure which is not included in the active fault map of Turkey, therefore, making a significant contribution to seismic hazard estimation.

18 October 2024 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SESemih Ergintav
Semih Ergintav
PVP. Vernant
P. Vernant
OTO. Tan
O. Tan
HKH. Karabulut
H. Karabulut
SÖSeda Özarpacı
Seda Özarpacı
İFİ. Farımaz
İ. Farımaz
The spatiotemporal pattern of surface displacements from large earthquakes provides crucial insights about the deformation of Earth’s crust at various scales and the interactions among tectonic plates. However, the lack of extensive and large-scale geodetic networks near such seismic events hinders our thorough understanding of the large-scale crustal deformation resulting from earthquakes. Using Türkiye’s extensive and continuous global navigation satellite system (GNSS) network during the moment magnitude 7.8 and 7.6 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes on 6 February 2023, we show that large earthquakes can induce far-field crustal deformations (>700 kilometers), exceeding current predictions from elastic dislocation models. They can lead to the mobilization of tectonic plates and the triggering of far-field earthquakes, which carries profound implications for seismic hazard assessments and necessitates a new perspective on crustal deformation and earthquake mechanics.

12 October 2022 in Seismological Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FTFatih Turhan
Fatih Turhan
DADiğdem Acarel
Diğdem Acarel
VPVladimír Plicka
Vladimír Plicka
MBMarco Bohnhoff
Marco Bohnhoff
RPRemzi Polat
Remzi Polat
JZJiří Zahradník
Jiří Zahradník
The submarine Main Marmara fault is overdue for an M > 7 earthquake in direct vicinity to the Istanbul megacity and the only segment of the right‐lateral North Anatolian fault zone that has not been activated since 1766. On 26 September 2019, an Mw 5.7 earthquake occurred offshore Silivri (west of Istanbul), stimulating the discussions on a future major earthquake. The predominant faulting style for this pending earthquake remains enigmatic. Here, we study the coseismic rupture evolution of the 2019 Silivri earthquake and decipher the multitype‐faulting aspects by a nonstandard approach. The event was dominated by a large compensated linear vector dipole component, of about −50%, that we interpret as a consecutive strike‐slip and thrust double‐couple episode, closely collocated in space and time. Because of local variations of the fault geometry at the eastern boundary of the central basin, crustal shortening and related thrust faulting are expected. A striking observation is the almost synchronous occurrence of both faulting types during a single earthquake. The earthquake complexity here is reported for the first time in the Sea of Marmara region and has to be considered in future rupture scenarios of an expected M > 7 event, with subsequent consequences for tsunami hazard and risk.

1 January 2023 in Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Sciences and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DADiğdem Acarel
Diğdem Acarel
The North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ), which forms the plate boundary between Anatolian Plate and Eurasian Plate, is one of the most active transform fault zones in the world. Following two consecutive magnitude M>7 earthquakes in 1999, an intensified monitoring of western portion of NAF is commenced. Dense networks of onshore/offshore seismic, acoustic, geodetic sensors and surface creep and strain sensors were installed. A single seismic sensor among these, which is located at the midpoint of 1999 ruptures, near Lake Sapanca, exhibits some unusual seismic activity. On a fault segment where creep is known to be present, a series of minor seismic events was observed with identical locations and a recurrence time of three years. These events are quite short in duration and highly similar in their waveforms. Using a single station approach, their angle of incidence and back azimuth were found to coincide with the location of two M2.3 and M2.1 events. At this stage, it is not clear whether these events reflect fault creep at seismogenic depth. Nevertheless, these initial observations emphasize the necessity of monitoring this segment more densely, where recurrent minor earthquakes are likely to be observed.