Ralf Loeffler

Dr. Ralf Loeffler

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 May 2009 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJane S Hankins
Jane S Hankins
BMBeth Elizabeth (Beth) McCarville
Beth Elizabeth (Beth) McCarville
RLRalf Loeffler
Ralf Loeffler
MSMatthew P. Smeltzer
Matthew P. Smeltzer
MOMihaela Onciu
Mihaela Onciu
CHClaudia M. Hillenbrand
Claudia M. Hillenbrand
R2* magnetic resonance imaging (R2*-MRI) can quantify hepatic iron content (HIC) by noninvasive means but is not fully investigated. Patients with iron overload completed 1.5T R2*-MRI examination and liver biopsy within 30 days. Forty-three patients (sickle cell anemia, n = 32; β-thalassemia major, n = 6; and bone marrow failure, n = 5) were analyzed: median age, 14 years, median transfusion duration, 15 months, average (±SD) serum ferritin 2718 plus or minus 1994 ng/mL, and average HIC 10.9 plus or minus 6.8 mg Fe/g dry weight liver. Regions of interest were drawn and analyzed by 3 independent reviewers with excellent agreement of their measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98). Ferritin and R2*-MRI were weakly but significantly associated (range of correlation coefficients among the 3 reviewers, 0.41-0.48; all P < .01). R2*-MRI was strongly associated with HIC for all 3 reviewers (correlation coefficients, 0.96-0.98; all P < .001). This high correlation confirms prior reports, calibrates R2*-MRI measurements, and suggests its clinical utility for predicting HIC using R2*-MRI. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00675038.

1 May 1998 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FBFlorian Bertsch
Florian Bertsch
JMJoachim Mattner
Joachim Mattner
MSMichael K Stehling
Michael K Stehling
UMUlrich M̈uLler-Lisse
Ulrich M̈uLler-Lisse
MPMichael Peller
Michael Peller
MRMaximilian Reiser
Maximilian Reiser

16 January 2017 in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AKAxel J. Krafft
Axel J. Krafft
RLRalf Loeffler
Ralf Loeffler
RSRuitian Song
Ruitian Song
ATAaryani Tipirneni-Sajja
Aaryani Tipirneni-Sajja
BMBeth Elizabeth (Beth) McCarville
Beth Elizabeth (Beth) McCarville
CHClaudia M. Hillenbrand
Claudia M. Hillenbrand

24 March 2010 in Pediatric Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BMBeth Elizabeth (Beth) McCarville
Beth Elizabeth (Beth) McCarville
CHClaudia M. Hillenbrand
Claudia M. Hillenbrand
RLRalf Loeffler
Ralf Loeffler
MSMatthew P. Smeltzer
Matthew P. Smeltzer
RSRuitan Song
Ruitan Song
JHJane S. Hankins
Jane S. Hankins

19 July 2010 in Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJane S Hankins
Jane S Hankins
BMBeth Elizabeth (Beth) McCarville
Beth Elizabeth (Beth) McCarville
CHClaudia M. Hillenbrand
Claudia M. Hillenbrand
RLRalf Loeffler
Ralf Loeffler
RWRussell E. Ware
Russell E. Ware
VJVijaya Joshi
Vijaya Joshi

22 December 2010 in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRuitian Song
Ruitian Song
ATAaryani Tipirneni-Sajja
Aaryani Tipirneni-Sajja
PJPerry Johnson
Perry Johnson
RLRalf Loeffler
Ralf Loeffler
CHClaudia M. Hillenbrand
Claudia M. Hillenbrand
Purpose To determine the tracking factor by studying the relationship between kidney and diaphragm motions and to compare the efficiency of the gating‐and‐following and gating‐only algorithms in reducing motion artifacts in navigator‐gated scans. Materials and Methods Diaphragm and kidney motions were measured by using real‐time TrueFISP sequences from 10 healthy human volunteers to determine tracking factors at different acceptance windows. Mean tracking factors were used to calculate mean residual errors and improvement factors for the gating‐and‐following and gating‐only algorithms. Results Mean tracking factors for ±4, ±6, ±8 mm and full acceptance windows ranged from 0.6 to 0.7, with large interindividual variations. Acceptance rates increased as the size of the acceptance window increased (acceptance rate for a 4 mm window ∼50%). There was a greater reduction of motion errors by gating‐and‐following (maximum of 1.86 mm) than gating‐only (maximum of 7.05 mm). Conclusion Mean tracking factors obtained in this study can be used as a guideline for using the gating‐and‐following algorithm in navigator‐gated kidney scans. The gating‐and‐following and gating‐only algorithms were quantitatively compared, and it was found that the former is more effective in reducing motion errors. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;33:143–148.