Salivary IL-6 mRNA was previously identified as a promising biomarker of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We performed a multi-center investigation covering all geographic areas of Hungary. Saliva from 95 patients with OSCC and 80 controls, all Caucasian, were collected together with demographic and clinicopathological data. Salivary IL-6 mRNA was quantified by real-time quantitative PCR. Salivary IL-6 protein concentration was measured by enzyme-linked immune-sorbent assay. IL-6 protein expression in tumor samples was investigated by immunohistochemistry. Normalized salivary IL-6 mRNA expression values were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients with OSCC (mean ± SE: 3.301 ± 0.885) vs. controls (mean ± SE: 0.037 ± 0.012). Differences remained significant regardless of tumor stage and grade. AUC of the ROC curve was 0.9379 (p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval: 0.8973–0.9795; sensitivity: 0.945; specificity: 0.819). Salivary IL-6 protein levels were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients (mean ± SE: 70.98 ± 14.06 pg/mL), than in controls (mean ± SE: 12.45 ± 3.29). Specificity and sensitivity of IL-6 protein were less favorable than that of IL-6 mRNA. Salivary IL-6 mRNA expression was significantly associated with age and dental status. IL-6 manifestation was detected in tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating leukocytes, suggesting the presence of a paracrine loop of stimulation. Salivary IL-6 mRNA is one of the best performing and clinically relevant biomarkers of OSCC.

Background: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a common adverse event following antiresorptive treatment, leading to chronic inflammation and exposed, necrotic bone surfaces in the jawbone. There is an increasing recognition of the role of compositional changes in the colonizing members of the oral microbiota implicated in triggering and/or maintaining MRONJ. The aim of our study was to characterize the culturable and non-culturable microbiota—with particular focus on Actinomyces spp. and Actinomyces-like organisms (ALOs)—from surgically removed bone samples of MRONJ patients and healthy control subjects. Methods: n = 35 patients (median age: 70 years) in various stages of MRONJ, with a history of receiving oral or intravenous antiresorptive treatment were included in the study. The controls (n = 35; median age: 35 years) consisted of otherwise healthy individuals undergoing tooth extraction. Traditional, quantitative, aerobic, and anaerobic culture, and Actinomyces-specific PCR was performed for all bone samples from patients and controls, while microbiome analyses—based on 16S rRNA sequencing—were carried out in 5-5 randomly selected samples. Mann–Whitney U test, Wilcoxon rank sum test (alpha diversity), and PERMANOVA analysis (beta diversity) were performed. Results: In MRONJ samples, 185 anaerobic isolates, corresponding to 65 different species were identified (vs. 72 isolates, corresponding to 27 different species in the control group). The detection of Actinomyces spp. and ALOs was more common in MRONJ bone samples, based on traditional culture (65.7% vs. 17.1%; p < 0.001) and PCR (82.9% vs. 37.1%; p < 0.001), respectively. The isolation of Fusobacterium spp. (22 vs. 7; p = 0.001), Prevotella spp. (22 vs. 6; p = 0.034), and Gram-positive anaerobic cocci (GPAC) (30 vs. 9; p = 0.016) was significantly more common in MRONJ patient samples. The microbiota of the controls’ bone samples were characterized by a considerable dominance of Streptococcus spp. and Veillonella spp, while the bacterial abundance rates were substantially more heterogeneous in MRONJ bone samples. Notable differences were not observed among the samples related to the abundance of Actinomyces in the bone microbiota. Conclusions: According to the “infection hypothesis”, alterations in the oral microbiome—with Actinomyces and ALOs being the most relevant—may play a key role in the development, aggravation, and progression of MRONJ. The timely detection of Actinomyces in necrotic bone is crucial, as it has important therapeutic implications.

Maxillofacial bone defects can have a profound impact on both facial function and aesthetics. While various biomaterial scaffolds have shown promise in addressing these challenges, regenerating bone in this region remains complex due to its irregular shape, intricate structure, and differing cellular origins compared to other bones in the human body. Moreover, the significant and variable mechanical loads placed on the maxillofacial bones add further complexity, especially in cases of difficult-to-treat medical conditions. This review provides a brief overview of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), highlighting the medication-induced adverse reactions and the associated clinical challenges in treating this condition. The purpose of this manuscript is to emphasize the role of biotechnology and tissue engineering technologies in therapy. By using scaffold materials and biofactors in combination with autologous cells, innovative solutions are explored for the repair of damaged facial bones. The ongoing search for effective scaffolds that can address these challenges and improve in vitro bone preparation for subsequent regeneration in the maxillofacial region remains critical. The primary purpose of this review is to spotlight current research trends and novel approaches in this area.