Jian-Guo Dai

Dr. Jian-Guo Dai

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2005 in Journal of Composites for Construction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jian-Guo DaiJian-Guo Dai
Jian-Guo Dai
Tamon UedaTamon Ueda
Tamon Ueda
YSYasuhiko Sato
Yasuhiko Sato
A new analytical method for defining the nonlinear bond stress–slip models of fiber reinforced plastics (FRP) sheet–concrete interfaces through pullout bond test is proposed. With this method, it is not necessary to attach many strain gauges on the FRP sheets for obtaining the strain distributions in FRP as well as the local bond stresses and slips. Instead, the local interfacial bond stress-slip models can be simply derived from the relationships between the pullout forces and loaded end slips. Based on a series of pullout tests, the bond stress–slip models of FRP sheet–concrete interfaces, in which different FRP stiffness, FRP materials (carbon FRP, aramid FRP, and glass FRP), and adhesives are used, have been derived. Only two parameters, the interfacial fracture energy and interfacial ductility index, which can take into account the effects of all interfacial components, are necessary in these models. Comparisons between analytical results and experimental ones show good accordance, indicating the rel...

1 January 2018 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QHQibing Hang
Qibing Hang
JYJiang-Tao Yu
Jiang-Tao Yu
Jian-Guo DaiJian-Guo Dai
Jian-Guo Dai
ZLZhou-Dao Lu
Zhou-Dao Lu
SSSurendra P. Shah
Surendra P. Shah

13 September 2020 in Advanced Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XXXiao Xue
Xiao Xue
MQMeng Qiu
Meng Qiu
YLYanwen Li
Yanwen Li
QZQ. M. Zhang
Q. M. Zhang
SLSiqi Li
Siqi Li
SFShanhui Fan
Shanhui Fan

1 November 2016 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YDYao Ding
Yao Ding
Jian-Guo DaiJian-Guo Dai
Jian-Guo Dai
CSCai-Jun Shi
Cai-Jun Shi

1 January 2013 in Cement and Concrete Composites
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YZYa-Guang Zhu
Ya-Guang Zhu
SKShi-Cong Kou
Shi-Cong Kou
CPChi Sun Poon
Chi Sun Poon
Jian-Guo DaiJian-Guo Dai
Jian-Guo Dai
QLQiu-Yi Li
Qiu-Yi Li

1 December 2011 in Journal of Composites for Construction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jian-Guo DaiJian-Guo Dai
Jian-Guo Dai
YBYu-Lei Bai
Yu-Lei Bai
JTJ. G. Teng
J. G. Teng
This paper presents the results of an experimental study on the behavior of concrete confined by fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) jackets with a large rupture strain (LRS). The FRP composites considered herein are formed by embedding polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibers in a suitable epoxy resin matrix. The PEN and PET fibers are usually made from recycled materials (e.g., PET bottles) and have a strain capacity greater than 5%. They are ideal for use in seismic retrofit applications where increases in ductility and energy absorption capacity are of prime concern. The present study has two specific objectives: (1)to develop a good understanding of the compressive stress-strain behavior of concrete confined with LRS FRP; and (2)to examine whether existing confinement models developed for conventional FRPs are applicable to LRS FRPs. As the existing models have been developed and verified mainly based on test data for CFRP and GFRP, which have a jacket hoop rupture strain of less than 2%, their accuracy in the hoop/lateral strain range beyond 2% is unclear. Results presented in this paper indicate that the two LRS FRPs made from PEN and PET fibers possess a bilinear tensile stress-strain relationship, which has a significant effect on the axial compressive stress-strain behavior of FRP-confined concrete. A recent confinement model for conventional FRPs is compared with the present test results, indicating that the model significantly overestimates the ultimate axial strain. A modified version of the model is then presented to provide more accurate predictions of the test results.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineerin