Inflammatory signal-mediated release of high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is a damage-associated molecular pattern or alarmin. The inflammatory functions of HMGB1 have been extensively investigated; however, less is known about the mechanisms controlling HMGB1 release. We show that SIRT1, the human homolog of theSaccharomyces cerevisiaeprotein silent information regulator 2, which is involved in cellular senescence and possibly the response to inflammation, forms a stable complex with HMGB1 in murine macrophage RAW264.7 cells. SIRT1 directly interacted with HMGB1 via its N-terminal lysine residues (28–30) and thereby inhibited HMGB1 release to improve survival in an experimental model of sepsis. By contrast, inflammatory stimuli such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and tumor necrosis factor-α promoted HMGB1 release by provoking its dissociation from SIRT1 dependent on acetylation, thereby increasing the association between HMGB1 and chromosome region maintenance 1, leading to HMGB1 translocation.In vivoinfection with wild-type SIRT1 and HMGB1K282930R, a hypo-acetylation mutant, improved survival (85.7%) during endotoxemia more than infection with wild-type SIRT1 and HMGB1-expressing adenovirus, indicating that the acetylation-dependent interaction between HMGB1 and SIRT1 is critical for LPS-induced lethality. Taken together, we propose that SIRT1 forms an anti-inflammatory complex with HMGB1, allowing cells to bypass the response to inflammation.
1 November 2017 in International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Insects and animals can recognize surrounding environments by detecting thousands of chemical odorants. Olfaction is a complicated process that begins in the olfactory epithelium with the specific binding of volatile odorant molecules to dedicated olfactory receptors (ORs). OR proteins are encoded by the largest gene superfamily in the mammalian genome. We report here the whole genome analysis of the olfactory receptor genes of S. scrofa using conserved OR gene specific motifs and known OR protein sequences from diverse species. We identified 1,301 OR related sequences from the S. scrofa genome assembly, Sscrofa10.2, including 1,113 functional OR genes and 188 pseudogenes. OR genes were located in 46 different regions on 16 pig chromosomes. We classified the ORs into 17 families, three Class I and 14 Class II families, and further grouped them into 349 subfamilies. We also identified inter- and intra-chromosomal duplications of OR genes residing on 11 chromosomes. A significant number of pig OR genes (n = 212) showed less than 60% amino acid sequence similarity to known OR genes of other species. As the genome assembly Sscrofa10.2 covers 99.9% of the pig genome, our analysis represents an almost complete OR gene repertoire from an individual pig genome. We show that S. scrofa has one of the largest OR repertoires, suggesting an expansion of OR genes in the swine genome. A significant number of unique OR genes in the pig genome may suggest the presence of swine specific olfactory stimulation.
Background: Mammalian olfactory receptors (ORs) are encoded by the largest mammalian multigene family. Understanding the OR gene repertoire in the cattle genome could lead to link the effects of genetic differences in these genes to variations in olfaction in cattle. Results: We report here a whole genome analysis of the olfactory receptor genes of Bos taurus using conserved OR gene-specific motifs and known OR protein sequences from diverse species. Our analysis, using the current cattle genome assembly UMD 3.1 covering 99.9% of the cattle genome, shows that the cattle genome contains 1,071 OR-related sequences including 881 functional, 190 pseudo, and 352 partial OR sequences. The OR genes are located in 49 clusters on 26 cattle chromosomes. We classified them into 18 families consisting of 4 Class I and 14 Class II families and these were further grouped into 272 subfamilies. Comparative analyses of the OR genes of cattle, pigs, humans, mice, and dogs showed that 6.0% (n = 53) of functional OR cattle genes were species-specific. We also showed that significant copy number variations are present in the OR repertoire of the cattle from the analysis of 10 selected OR genes. Conclusion: Our analysis revealed the almost complete OR gene repertoire from an individual cattle genome. Though the number of OR genes were lower than in pigs, the analysis of the genetic system of cattle ORs showed close similarities to that of the pig.
The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)δ has been implicated in the pathogenesis of atherogenic disorders. However, its physiological roles and functions in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) remain relatively unclear. In the present study, we show that the gene encoding transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 is a PPARδ target in VSMCs. The PPARδ activator GW501516 upregulates TGF-β1 expression in a dose- and time-dependent manner. This induction is attenuated significantly by the presence of small interfering RNA against PPARδ or GW9662, an inhibitor of PPARδ. Furthermore, activated PPARδ induces TGF-β1 promoter activity by binding to the direct repeat-1 response element TGF-β1–direct repeat-1. Mutations in the 5′ or 3′ half-sites of the response element totally abrogate transcriptional activation and PPARδ binding, which suggests that this site is a novel type of PPARδ response element. In addition, ligand-activated PPARδ attenuated the promoter activity and expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 induced by interleukin-1β. These effects were significantly reduced in the presence of small interfering RNA against PPARδ, anti–TGF-β1 antibody, or a TGF-β type I receptor inhibitor. Decreased monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression induced by PPARδ was mediated by the effector of TGF-β1, Smad3. Finally, administration of GW501516 to mice upregulated TGF-β1, whereas the expression of proinflammatory genes including monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 was significantly attenuated in the thoracic aorta. Taken together, these results demonstrate the presence of a novel TGF-β1–mediated pathway in the antiinflammatory activities of PPARδ.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) inhibit lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-primed release of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), a late proinflammatory mediator, but the underlying molecular mechanism is not completely understood. In this study, we demonstrated that the inhibition of HMGB1 release by PPAR-δ and -γ is associated with the deacetylase activity of SIRT1. Ligand-activated PPAR-δ and -γ inhibited LPS-primed release of HMGB1, concomitant with elevation in SIRT1 expression and promoter activity. These effects were significantly reduced in the presence of small interfering (si)RNAs against PPAR, indicating that PPAR-δ and -γ are involved in both HMGB1 release and SIRT1 expression. In addition, modulation of SIRT1 expression and activity by siRNA or chemicals correspondingly influenced the effects of PPARs on HMGB1 release, suggesting a mechanism in which SIRT1 modulates HMGB1 release. Furthermore, we showed for the first time that HMGB1 acetylated in response to LPS or p300/CBP-associated factor (PCAF) is an effective substrate for SIRT1, and that deacetylation of HMGB1 is responsible for blockade of HMGB1 release in macrophages. Finally, acetylation of HMGB1 was elevated in mouse embryonic fibroblasts from SIRT1-knockout mice, whereas this increase was completely reversed by ectopic expression of SIRT1. These results indicate that PPAR-mediated upregulation of SIRT1 modulates the status of HMGB1 acetylation, which, in turn, has a critical role in the cellular response to inflammation through deacetylation-mediated regulation of HMGB1 release.