Background: Long-term outcomes of antiplatelet monotherapy in patients who receive percutaneous coronary intervention are unknown. The HOST-EXAM (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis–Extended Antiplatelet Monotherapy) Extended study reports the posttrial follow-up results of the original HOST-EXAM trial. Methods: From March 2014 through May 2018, 5438 patients who maintained dual antiplatelet therapy without clinical events for 12±6 months after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive clopidogrel (75 mg once daily) or aspirin (100 mg once daily). The primary end point (a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, readmission attributable to acute coronary syndrome, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or greater bleeding), secondary thrombotic end point (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, readmission attributable to acute coronary syndrome, and definite or probable stent thrombosis), and bleeding end point (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2 or greater bleeding) were analyzed during the extended follow-up period. Analysis was performed on the per-protocol population (2431 patients in the clopidogrel group and 2286 patients in the aspirin group). Results: During a median follow-up of 5.8 years (interquartile range, 4.8–6.2 years), the primary end point occurred in 12.8% and 16.9% in the clopidogrel and aspirin groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.63–0.86]; P <0.001). The clopidogrel group had a lower risk for the secondary thrombotic end point (7.9% versus 11.9%; hazard ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.55–0.79]; P 5 years after randomization, clopidogrel monotherapy compared with aspirin monotherapy was associated with lower rates of the composite net clinical outcome in patients without clinical events for 12±6 months after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02044250.

Background Prolonged dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) is intended to reduce ischaemic events, at the cost of an increased bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this study, we evaluated whether race influences the ischaemia/bleeding risk trade-off. Methods We searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing DAPT duration after PCI. To compare the benefit or harm between DAPT duration by race, individual patient-level landmark meta-analysis was performed after discontinuation of the shorter duration DAPT group in each RCT. The primary ischaemic endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and the primary bleeding endpoint was major bleeding events (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03338335). Results Seven RCTs including 16,518 patients (8,605 East Asians, 7,913 non-East Asians) were pooled. MACE occurred more frequently in non-East Asians (0.8% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.001), while major bleeding events occurred more frequently in East Asians (0.6% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.001). In Cox proportional hazards model, prolonged DAPT significantly increased the risk of major bleeding in East Asians (hazard ratio [HR], 2.843, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.474–5.152, p = 0.002), but not in non-East Asians (HR, 1.375, 95% CI, 0.523–3.616, p = 0.523). East Asians had a higher median probability risk ratio of bleeding to ischaemia (0.66 vs. 0.15), and the proportion of patients with higher probability of bleeding than ischaemia was significantly higher in East Asians (32.3% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001). Conclusion We suggest that the ischaemia/bleeding trade-off may be different between East Asians and non-East Asians. In East Asians, prolonged DAPT may have no effect in reducing the ischaemic risk, while significantly increases the bleeding risk.

Objective: To assess the long term comparative effectiveness of P2Y ₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy compared with aspirin monotherapy in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Design: Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Data sources: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Ovid/Embase. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Randomised trials investigating monotherapy with a P2Y ₁₂ inhibitor or aspirin for secondary prevention of ischaemic events in patients with coronary artery disease who underwent PCI. Data extraction and synthesis: Anonymised IPD were extracted and transferred to the coordinating centre by dedicated electronic spreadsheets. Data were primarily combined by mixed effects models (one stage analysis) and complemented with multivariable mixed effects models and two stage analyses based on random effects models. The primary and co-primary outcomes were a composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and major bleeding, respectively. The secondary outcomes included a net composite of adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (NACCE), derived from the combination of the primary and co-primary outcomes, and individual ischaemic and bleeding events. Results: A total of 16 117 patients assigned to P2Y ₁₂ inhibitor or aspirin monotherapy after PCI and completion of the recommended DAPT regimen (median duration of 12 months) in five randomised trials were included. At a median follow-up of 1351 days (interquartile range 373-1791 days), P2Y ₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of MACCE compared with aspirin monotherapy (one stage analysis: hazard ratio 0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67 to 0.89), P<0.001; multivariable one stage analysis: adjusted hazard ratio 0.77 (0.67 to 0.89), P<0.001; two stage analysis: hazard ratio 0.77 (0.67 to 0.89), P<0.001), yielding a number needed to treat to benefit of 45.5 (95% CI 31.4 to 93.6). No significant difference in major bleeding (one stage analysis: hazard ratio 1.26 (0.78 to 2.04), P=0.35; multivariable one stage analysis: 1.12 (0.74 to 1.70), P=0.60; two stage analysis: 1.15 (0.69 to 1.92), P=0.59) was observed. NACCE, myocardial infarction, and stroke were lower in patients assigned to a P2Y ₁₂ inhibitor compared with those assigned to aspirin. These findings were confirmed across multiple sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Conclusions: In patients who had undergone PCI and discontinued DAPT, at a follow-up of about 5.5 years, P2Y ₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy with ticagrelor or clopidogrel was associated with lower MACCE, owing to reduced rates of myocardial infarction and stroke compared with aspirin monotherapy, without a concurrent increased risk of major bleeding. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024517983.

Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a potent P2Y12 inhibitor is the standard treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). De-escalation of the potent P2Y12 inhibtor is an appealing concept to balance the ischaemic and bleeding risks after PCI. An individual patient data meta-analysis was performed to compare de-escalation versus standard DAPT in patients with ACS. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database, were searched to identify randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the de-escalation strategy with the standard DAPT after PCI in patients with ACS. Individual patient-level data were collected from the relevant trials. The co-primary endpoints of interest were the ischaemic composite endpoint (a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular events) and bleeding endpoint (any bleeding) at 1-year post-PCI. Four RCTs (the TROPICAL-ACS, POPular Genetics, HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS, and TALOS-AMI trials) including 10 133 patients were analysed. The ischaemic endpoint was significantly lower in the patients assigned to the de-escalation strategy than in those assigned to the standard strategy (2.3% vs. 3.0%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.761, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.597-0.972, log rank P = 0.029). Bleeding was also significantly lower in the de-escalation strategy group (6.5% vs. 9.1%, HR 0.701, 95% CI 0.606-0.811, log rank P < 0.001). No significant intergroup differences were observed in terms of all-cause death and major bleeding events. Subgroup analyses revealed that compared to guided de-escalation, unguided de-escalation had a significantly larger impact on bleeding endpoint reduction (P for interaction = 0.007); no intergroup differences were observed for the ischaemic endpoints. In this individual patient data meta-analysis, DAPT-based de-escalation was associated with both decreased ischaemic and bleeding endpoints. Reduction in bleeding endpoints was more prominent for the unguided than the guided de-escalation strategy. This study was registered in the PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021245477). A total of 10 133 patients from four randomized clinical trials were analysed. During the first year after percutaneous coronary intervention, the de-escalation strategy was associated with a lower risk of the ischaemic and bleeding endpoints. The absolute risk difference of endpoints between the two astrategies was 0.69% for the ischaemic endpoint and 2.48% for the bleeding endpoint. CI, confidence interval; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; HR, hazard ratio.

Background: Large-scale randomized comparison of drug-eluting stents (DES) based on durable polymer versus biodegradable polymer technology is currently insufficient in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The present study aimed to prove the noninferiority of the durable polymer DES (DP-DES) compared with the biodegradable polymer DES (BP-DES) in such patients. Methods: The HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Diseases—Comparison of Reduction of Prasugrel Dose or Polymer Technology in ACS Patients) trial is an investigator-initiated, randomized, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, multicenter, noninferiority trial comparing the efficacy and safety of DP-DES and BP-DES in patients with ACS. The primary end point was a patient-oriented composite outcome (a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and any repeat revascularization) at 12 months. The key secondary end point was device-oriented composite outcome (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization) at 12 months. Results: A total of 3413 patients were randomized to receive the DP-DES (1713 patients) and BP-DES (1700 patients). At 12 months, patient-oriented composite outcome occurred in 5.2% in the DP-DES group and 6.4% in the BP-DES group (absolute risk difference, –1.2%; P _{non inferiority} <0.001). The key secondary end point, device-oriented composite outcome, occurred less frequently in the DP-DES group (DP-DES vs BP-DES, 2.6% vs 3.9%; hazard ratio, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.46–0.98]; P =0.038), mostly because of a reduction in target lesion revascularization. The rate of spontaneous nonfatal myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis were extremely low, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (0.6% versus 0.8%; P =0.513 and 0.1% versus 0.4%; P =0.174, respectively). Conclusions: In ACS patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention, DP-DES was noninferior to BP-DES with regard to patient-oriented composite outcomes at 12 months after index percutaneous coronary intervention. Registration: URL: https://wwwclinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02193971.