Helen Birch

Prof. Helen Birch

Department of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, Stanmore Campus, Stanmore HA7 4LP, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 May 2013 in International Journal of Experimental Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CTChavaunne Thorpe
Chavaunne Thorpe
Helen BirchHelen Birch
Helen Birch
PCPeter Clegg
Peter Clegg
HSHazel R.C. Screen
Hazel R.C. Screen

4 July 2012 in Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CTChavaunne Thorpe
Chavaunne Thorpe
CUChineye P. Udeze
Chineye P. Udeze
Helen BirchHelen Birch
Helen Birch
PCPeter Clegg
Peter Clegg
HSHazel R. C. Screen
Hazel R. C. Screen
Tendons transfer force from muscle to bone. Specific tendons, including the equine superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT), also store and return energy. For efficient function, energy-storing tendons need to be more extensible than positional tendons such as the common digital extensor tendon (CDET), and when testedin vitrohave a lower modulus and failure stress, but a higher failure strain. It is not known how differences in matrix organization contribute to distinct mechanical properties in functionally different tendons. We investigated the properties of whole tendons, tendon fascicles and the fascicular interface in the high-strain energy-storing SDFT and low-strain positional CDET. Fascicles failed at lower stresses and strains than tendons. The SDFT was more extensible than the CDET, but SDFT fascicles failed at lower strains than CDET fascicles, resulting in large differences between tendon and fascicle failure strain in the SDFT. At physiological loads, the stiffness at the fascicular interface was lower in the SDFT samples, enabling a greater fascicle sliding that could account for differences in tendon and fascicle failure strain. Sliding between fascicles prior to fascicle extension in the SDFT may allow the large extensions required in energy-storing tendons while protecting fascicles from damage.

1 May 2010 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CTChavaunne Thorpe
Chavaunne Thorpe
ISIan Streeter
Ian Streeter
GPGina L. Pinchbeck
Gina L. Pinchbeck
AGAllen E. Goodship
Allen E. Goodship
PCPeter Clegg
Peter Clegg
Helen BirchHelen Birch
Helen Birch
Little is known about the rate at which protein turnover occurs in living tendon and whether the rate differs between tendons with different physiological roles. In this study, we have quantified the racemization of aspartic acid to calculate the age of the collagenous and non-collagenous components of the high strain injury-prone superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) and low strain rarely injured common digital extensor tendon (CDET) in a group of horses with a wide age range. In addition, the turnover of collagen was assessed indirectly by measuring the levels of collagen degradation markers (collagenase-generated neoepitope and cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen). The fractional increase in D-Asp was similar (p = 0.7) in the SDFT (5.87 x 10(-4)/year) and CDET (5.82 x 10(-4)/year) tissue, and D/L-Asp ratios showed a good correlation with pentosidine levels. We calculated a mean (+/-S.E.) collagen half-life of 197.53 (+/-18.23) years for the SDFT, which increased significantly with horse age (p = 0.03) and was significantly (p < 0.001) higher than that for the CDET (34.03 (+/-3.39) years). Using similar calculations, the half-life of non-collagenous protein was 2.18 (+/-0.41) years in the SDFT and was significantly (p = 0.04) lower than the value of 3.51 (+/-0.51) years for the CDET. Collagen degradation markers were higher in the CDET and suggested an accumulation of partially degraded collagen within the matrix with aging in the SDFT. We propose that increased susceptibility to injury in older individuals results from an inability to remove partially degraded collagen from the matrix leading to reduced mechanical competence.

10 August 2007 in International Journal of Experimental Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Helen BirchHelen Birch
Helen Birch
Summary: Tendons are dense regular connective tissue structures that are defined based on their anatomical position of connecting muscle to bone. Despite these obvious commons features tendons from different locations within the body show remarkable variation in terms of their morphological, molecular and mechanical properties which relates to their specialized function. An appreciation of these differences is necessary to understand all aspects of tendon biology in health and disease. In our work, we have used a combination of mechanical assessment, histological measurements and molecular analysis of matrix in functionally distinct tendons to determine relationships between function and structure. We have found significant differences in material and molecular properties between spring‐like tendons that are subjected to high strains during locomotion and positional tendons which are subjected to much lower strains. Furthermore, we have data to suggest that not only is the matrix composition different but also the ability of cells to synthesize and degrade the matrix (matrix turnover) varies between tendon types. We propose that these differences relate to the magnitude of strain that the tendon experiences during normal activities in life. Tendon cells may be preprogrammed during embryological development for the strain they will encounter in life or may simply respond to the particular strain environment they are subjected to. The elucidation of controlling mechanisms resulting in tendon cell specialization will have important consequences for cell based therapies and engineering strategies to repair damaged tendons.

1 December 2015 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CTChavaunne Thorpe
Chavaunne Thorpe
MGMarta S.C. Godinho
Marta S.C. Godinho
GRGraham P. Riley
Graham P. Riley
Helen BirchHelen Birch
Helen Birch
PCPeter Clegg
Peter Clegg
HSHazel R.C. Screen
Hazel R.C. Screen
While the predominant function of all tendons is to transfer force from muscle to bone and position the limbs, some tendons additionally function as energy stores, reducing the cost of locomotion. Energy storing tendons experience extremely high strains and need to be able to recoil efficiently for maximum energy storage and return. In the equine forelimb, the energy storing superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) has much higher failure strains than the positional common digital extensor tendon (CDET). However, we have previously shown that this is not due to differences in the properties of the SDFT and CDET fascicles (the largest tendon subunits). Instead, there is a greater capacity for interfascicular sliding in the SDFT which facilitates the greater extensions in this particular tendon (Thorpe et al., 2012). In the current study, we exposed fascicles and interfascicular matrix (IFM) from the SDFT and CDET to cyclic loading followed by a test to failure. The results show that IFM mechanical behaviour is not a result of irreversible deformation, but the IFM is able to withstand cyclic loading, and is more elastic in the SDFT than in the CDET. We also assessed the effect of ageing on IFM properties, demonstrating that the IFM is less able to resist repetitive loading as it ages, becoming stiffer with increasing age in the SDFT. These results provide further indications that the IFM is important for efficient function in energy storing tendons, and age-related alterations to the IFM may compromise function and predispose older tendons to injury.

1 December 2002 in Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRoger Smith
Roger Smith
Helen BirchHelen Birch
Helen Birch
SGS Goodman
S Goodman
DHD Heinegård
D Heinegård
AGA.E Goodship
A.E Goodship