Przemysław Śleszyński

Prof. Dr. Przemysław Śleszyński

Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2020 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Przemysław ŚleszyńskiPrzemysław Śleszyński
Przemysław Śleszyński
AKAdam Kowalewski
Adam Kowalewski
TMTadeusz Markowski
Tadeusz Markowski
PLPaulina Legutko-Kobus
Paulina Legutko-Kobus
Maciej NowakMaciej Nowak
Maciej Nowak
This paper is based on the results of an extensive (840-page) report of the Committee on National Spatial Development of the Polish Academy of Sciences, entitled Studies on Spatial Chaos (edited by A. Kowalewski, T, Markowski and P. Śleszyński—Studia KPZK PAN, vol. 182, Warsaw 2018—in Polish). Its aim was to conduct a comprehensive and detailed study on the problem of spatial chaos (spatial disorder), including an estimate of economic costs in Poland. For this purpose, literature was queried (articles and reports, etc.) and special analyses were prepared for this purpose. The total annual costs of spatial chaos were estimated at not less than 20 billion euros per year. The conclusions also proposed solutions and suggestions (for the government and local governments), which may reduce the acute costs of spatial chaos in society and economy.



14 July 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Przemysław ŚleszyńskiPrzemysław Śleszyński
Przemysław Śleszyński
Piotr GibasPiotr Gibas
Piotr Gibas
PSPaweł Sudra
Paweł Sudra
The main goal of the article is the evaluation of usefulness of CORINE Land Cover (CLC) data—acquired predominantly by visual interpretation of Landsat satellite imagery—for monitoring of changes in settlement development and land use. This has been done by comparison of occurrence of buildings (and address points) in Poland with delimitations of land use belonging to particular classes in the CLC 2018 dataset. Large discrepancies have been identified, which reach on average approx. 34% of addresses and 35% of buildings located outside class 1 (artificial surfaces), mainly on terrains of class 2 (agricultural areas). Among single-family buildings it was 37% and among new addresses (forecasted or “under construction” buildings)—as much as 50%. This puts a question mark over the possibility of using CLC data with a resolution of 25 ha for monitoring of spatial planning and development in Poland for purposes of the diagnosis and assessment of the scale of dispersion of built-up areas. It is worth carrying out similar analyses in other countries, known for the deconcentration processes and a relatively large share of dispersed settlement, e.g., other CEE countries, Spain, Portugal, Italy.

24 March 2014 in Geographia Polonica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWMarek Więckowski
Marek Więckowski
Daniel MichniakDaniel Michniak
Daniel Michniak
MBMaria Bednarek-Szczepańska
Maria Bednarek-Szczepańska
BCBranislav Chrenka
Branislav Chrenka
VIVladimír Ira
Vladimír Ira
RWRafał Wiśniewski
Rafał Wiśniewski