Roman Lara-Cueva

Prof. Roman Lara-Cueva

Eléctrica, Electrónica y Telecomunicaciones, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE, Sangolquí, Pichincha, Ecuador
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FLFernando Lara
Fernando Lara
Roman Lara-CuevaRoman Lara-Cueva
Roman Lara-Cueva
JLJulio C. Larco
Julio C. Larco
ECEnrique V. Carrera
Enrique V. Carrera
RLRubén León
Rubén León

16 January 2015 in IEEE Sensors Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Roman Lara-CuevaRoman Lara-Cueva
Roman Lara-Cueva
DBDiego Benítez
Diego Benítez
ACAntonio Caamano
Antonio Caamano
Marco ZennaroMarco Zennaro
Marco Zennaro
José-Luis Rojo-ÁlvarezJosé-Luis Rojo-Álvarez
José-Luis Rojo-Álvarez
A volcanic eruption early warning has to be launched with effectiveness and within the shortest time possible, which imposes the requirement of using real-time (RT) systems. In this setting, volcano-monitoring systems using wireless sensor networks (WSNs) may play a key role. Previous work did not report detailed-enough performance evaluation, in order to identify their main constraints as RT systems, either in simulation tools or in testbed scenarios. The aim of this paper was to identify the optimum number of sensors to be deployed a posteriori, based on simulation results considering throughput, packet loss, and end-to-end delay, as metrics to satisfy the RT requirements. We corroborated the simulation results obtained by a testbed deployment within a controlled environment. We determined that optimal scenario for volcano monitoring is a random topology, and the results show that 12 nodes should be deployed as maximum to satisfy the RT constraints. To test the system in a real scenario, 10 sensors were deployed in a strategic area at Cotopaxi Volcano, and information was collected during three days of continuous monitoring. This information was sent to a remote surveillance laboratory located 45 km away from the station placed at the volcano using WiFi-based long-distance technology. Our study shows that the coordinator node is the main bottleneck in the real application scenario, given that its processing rate provokes an excessive time delay near to 3 s, which has to be solved to satisfy the RT requirements. We conclude that a comprehensive study, including simulation, testbed, and in-situ deployment, provides valuable information for the specifications to be accounted in permanent WSN RT volcano monitoring.

26 May 2016 in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Roman Lara-CuevaRoman Lara-Cueva
Roman Lara-Cueva
DBDiego Benítez
Diego Benítez
ECEnrique Carrera
Enrique Carrera
MRMario Ruiz
Mario Ruiz
José-Luis Rojo-ÁlvarezJosé-Luis Rojo-Álvarez
José-Luis Rojo-Álvarez
Geophysics experts are interested in understanding the behavior of volcanoes and forecasting possible eruptions by monitoring and detecting the increment on volcano-seismic activity, with the aim of safeguarding human lives and material losses. This paper presents an automatic volcanic event detection and classification system, which considers feature extraction and feature selection stages, to reduce the processing time toward a reliable real-time volcano early warning system (RT-VEWS). We built the proposed approach in terms of the seismicity presented in 2009 and 2010 at the Cotopaxi Volcano located in Ecuador. In the detection stage, the recordings were time segmented by using a nonoverlapping 15-s window, and in the classification stage, the detected seismic signals were 1-min long. For each detected signal conveying seismic events, a comprehensive set of statistical, temporal, spectral, and scale-domain features were compiled and extracted, aiming to separate long-period (LP) events from volcano-tectonic (VT) earthquakes. We benchmarked two commonly used types of feature selection techniques, namely, wrapper (recursive feature extraction) and embedded (cross-validation and pruning). Each technique was used within a suitable and appropriate classification algorithm, either the support vector machine (SVM) or the decision trees. The best result was obtained by using the SVM classifier, yielding up to 99% accuracy in the detection stage and 97% accuracy and sensitivity in the event classification stage. Selected features and their interpretation were consistent among different input spaces in simple terms of the spectral content of the frequency bands at 3.1 and 6.8 Hz. A comparative analysis showed that the most relevant features for automatic discrimination between LP and VT events were one in the time domain, five in the frequency domain, and nine in the scale domain. Our study provides the framework for an event classification system with high accuracy and reduced computational requirements, according to the orientation toward a future RT-VEWS.

1 May 2020 in Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NPNoel Pérez
Noel Pérez
DBDiego Benítez
Diego Benítez
FGFelipe Grijalva
Felipe Grijalva
Roman Lara-CuevaRoman Lara-Cueva
Roman Lara-Cueva
MRMario Ruiz
Mario Ruiz
JAJorge Aguilar
Jorge Aguilar

29 May 2019 in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PVPablo Venegas
Pablo Venegas
NPNoel Pérez-Pérez
Noel Pérez-Pérez
DBDiego Benítez
Diego Benítez
Roman Lara-CuevaRoman Lara-Cueva
Roman Lara-Cueva
MRMario Ruiz
Mario Ruiz
This paper proposes an exhaustive evaluation of five different filter-based feature selection methods in combination with a Gaussian mixture model classifier for the classification of long-period (LP) and volcano-tectonic (VT) seismic events recorded at Cotopaxi volcano in Ecuador. The experimentation included both exploring and ranking search spaces of seismic-signal-based features, and selecting subsets of optimal features for event classification. The evaluation was carried out by using an experimental dataset formed by 587 LP and 81 VT feature vectors, each composed of 84 statistical, temporal, spectral, and scale-domain features extracted from the original seismic signals. The best result in accuracy, precision, recall, and processing time for LP seismic event classification was obtained by using the Chi2 discretization method with five features, achieving 95.62%, 99.08%, 95.94%, and 3.7 ms, respectively, whereas for VT seismic event classification, the uFilter method with five features reached the scores of 96.71%, 85.23%, 96.00%, and 4.1 ms, respectively. For the classification of both seismic events simultaneously, the uFilter method with five features yielded 96.70%, 97.77%, 96.7%, and 4.1 ms, respectively. According to the Wilcoxon statistical test, these classification schemes provide competitive seismic event classification, while reducing the required processing time.

1 October 2020 in Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAdrian Duque
Adrian Duque
KGKevin González
Kevin González
NPNoel Pérez
Noel Pérez
DBDiego Benítez
Diego Benítez
FGFelipe Grijalva
Felipe Grijalva
MRMario Ruiz
Mario Ruiz