Alexander Karaulov

Prof. Alexander Karaulov

Clinical immunology and allergy, I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Moskva, Russia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

51Years (1976-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 February 2018 in Discover Nano
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAlyona Sukhanova
Alyona Sukhanova
SBSvetlana Bozrova
Svetlana Bozrova
PSPavel Sokolov
Pavel Sokolov
MBMikhail Berestovoy
Mikhail Berestovoy
AKAlexander Karaulov
Alexander Karaulov
Igor NabievIgor Nabiev
Igor Nabiev
Studies on the methods of nanoparticle (NP) synthesis, analysis of their characteristics, and exploration of new fields of their applications are at the forefront of modern nanotechnology. The possibility of engineering water-soluble NPs has paved the way to their use in various basic and applied biomedical researches. At present, NPs are used in diagnosis for imaging of numerous molecular markers of genetic and autoimmune diseases, malignant tumors, and many other disorders. NPs are also used for targeted delivery of drugs to tissues and organs, with controllable parameters of drug release and accumulation. In addition, there are examples of the use of NPs as active components, e.g., photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy and in hyperthermic tumor destruction through NP incorporation and heating. However, a high toxicity of NPs for living organisms is a strong limiting factor that hinders their use in vivo. Current studies on toxic effects of NPs aimed at identifying the targets and mechanisms of their harmful effects are carried out in cell culture models; studies on the patterns of NP transport, accumulation, degradation, and elimination, in animal models. This review systematizes and summarizes available data on how the mechanisms of NP toxicity for living systems are related to their physical and chemical properties.

1 October 2020 in Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMSarah Miethe
Sarah Miethe
AKAntonina Karsonova
Antonina Karsonova
AKAlexander Karaulov
Alexander Karaulov
RHRenz Harald
Renz Harald

1 December 2020 in Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSChrysanthi Skevaki
Chrysanthi Skevaki
AKAntonina Karsonova
Antonina Karsonova
AKAlexander Karaulov
Alexander Karaulov
MXMin Xie
Min Xie
RHRenz Harald
Renz Harald

1 November 2018 in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RVRudolf Valenta
Rudolf Valenta
AKAlexander Karaulov
Alexander Karaulov
VNVerena Niederberger
Verena Niederberger
Yury V. ZhernovYury V. Zhernov
Yury V. Zhernov
OEOlga Elisyutina
Olga Elisyutina
MKMusa Khaitov
Musa Khaitov
Today, in vivo allergy diagnosis and allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) are still based on allergen extracts obtained from natural allergen sources. Several studies analyzing the composition of natural allergen extracts have shown severe problems regarding their quality such as the presence of undefined nonallergenic materials, contaminants as well as high variabilities regarding contents and biological activity of individual allergens. Despite the increasing availability of sophisticated analytical technologies, these problems cannot be overcome because they are inherent to allergen sources and methods of extract production. For in vitro allergy diagnosis problems related to natural allergen extracts have been largely overcome by the implementation of recombinant allergen molecules that are defined regarding purity and biological activity. However, no such advances have been made for allergen preparations to be used in vivo for diagnosis and therapy. No clinical studies have been performed for allergen extracts available for in vivo allergy diagnosis that document safety, sensitivity, and specificity of the products. Only for very few therapeutic allergen extracts state-of-the-art clinical studies have been performed that provide evidence for safety and efficacy. In this article, we discuss problems related to the inconsistent quality of products based on natural allergen extracts and share our observations that most of the products available for in vivo diagnosis and AIT do not meet the international standards for medicinal products. We argue that a replacement of natural allergen extracts by defined recombinantly produced allergen molecules and/or mixtures thereof may be the only way to guarantee the supply of clinicians with state-of-the-art medicinal products for in vivo diagnosis and treatment of allergic patients in the future.

6 April 2020 in Allergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YDYulia Dorofeeva
Yulia Dorofeeva
ISIgor Shilovskiy
Igor Shilovskiy
ITInna Tulaeva
Inna Tulaeva
MFMargarete Focke-Tejkl
Margarete Focke-Tejkl
SFSabine Flicker
Sabine Flicker
RVRudolf Valenta
Rudolf Valenta
Allergen‐specific immunotherapy (AIT) is an allergen‐specific form of treatment for patients suffering from immunoglobulin E (IgE)‐associated allergy; the most common and important immunologically mediated hypersensitivity disease. AIT is based on the administration of the disease‐causing allergen with the goal to induce a protective immunity consisting of allergen‐specific blocking IgG antibodies and alterations of the cellular immune response so that the patient can tolerate allergen contact. Major advantages of AIT over all other existing treatments for allergy are that AIT induces a long‐lasting protection and prevents the progression of disease to severe manifestations. AIT is cost effective because it uses the patient´s own immune system for protection and potentially can be used as a preventive treatment. However, broad application of AIT is limited by mainly technical issues such as the quality of allergen preparations and the risk of inducing side effects which results in extremely cumbersome treatment schedules reducing patient´s compliance. In this article we review progress in AIT made from its beginning and provide an overview of the state of the art, the needs for further development, and possible technical solutions available through molecular allergology. Finally, we consider visions for AIT development towards prophylactic application.

30 April 2020 in Cell Death & Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SYShida Yousefi
Shida Yousefi
DSDagmar Simon
Dagmar Simon
DSDarko Stojkov
Darko Stojkov
AKAntonina Karsonova
Antonina Karsonova
AKAlexander Karaulov
Alexander Karaulov
Hans-Uwe SimonHans-Uwe Simon
Hans-Uwe Simon
Extracellular DNA trap formation is a cellular function of neutrophils, eosinophils, and basophils that facilitates the immobilization and killing of invading microorganisms in the extracellular milieu. To form extracellular traps, granulocytes release a scaffold consisting of mitochondrial DNA in association with granule proteins. As we understand more about the molecular mechanism for the formation of extracellular DNA traps, the in vivo function of this phenomenon under pathological conditions remains an enigma. In this article, we critically review the literature to summarize the evidence for extracellular DNA trap formation under in vivo conditions. Extracellular DNA traps have not only been detected in infectious diseases but also in chronic inflammatory diseases, as well as in cancer. While on the one hand, extracellular DNA traps clearly exhibit an important function in host defense, it appears that they can also contribute to the maintenance of inflammation and metastasis, suggesting that they may represent an interesting drug target for such pathological conditions.