Leandro Juen

Prof. Leandro Juen

Universidade Federal do Pará, Brazil
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 July 2008 in Hydrobiologia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JNJorge L. Nessimian
Jorge L. Nessimian
EVEduardo M. Venticinque
Eduardo M. Venticinque
JZJansen Zuanon
Jansen Zuanon
PMPaulo De Marco
Paulo De Marco
MGMarcelo Gordo
Marcelo Gordo
Leandro JuenLeandro Juen
Leandro Juen

8 May 2020 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RDRenato B. Dala‐Corte
Renato B. Dala‐Corte
AMAdriano S. Melo
Adriano S. Melo
TSTadeu Siqueira
Tadeu Siqueira
LBLuis M. Bini
Luis M. Bini
RMRenato Tavares Martins
Renato Tavares Martins
Fabio de Oliveira Roque RoqueFabio de Oliveira Roque Roque
Fabio de Oliveira Roque Roque

1 October 2017 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TMThiago Barros Miguel
Thiago Barros Miguel
José Max Barbosa Oliveira-JuniorJosé Max Barbosa Oliveira-Junior
José Max Barbosa Oliveira-Junior
RLRaphael Ligeiro
Raphael Ligeiro
Leandro JuenLeandro Juen
Leandro Juen

27 March 2015 in Austral Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
José Max Barbosa Oliveira-JuniorJosé Max Barbosa Oliveira-Junior
José Max Barbosa Oliveira-Junior
YSYulie Shimano
Yulie Shimano
TGToby Alan Gardner
Toby Alan Gardner
RHRobert M. Hughes
Robert M. Hughes
PJPaulo de Marco Júnior
Paulo de Marco Júnior
Leandro JuenLeandro Juen
Leandro Juen

5 June 2013 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TGToby A. Gardner
Toby A. Gardner
JFJoice Ferreira
Joice Ferreira
JBJos Barlow
Jos Barlow
ALAlexander C. Lees
Alexander C. Lees
LPLuke Parry
Luke Parry
JZJansen Zuanon
Jansen Zuanon
Science has a critical role to play in guiding more sustainable development trajectories. Here, we present the Sustainable Amazon Network ( Rede Amazônia Sustentável , RAS): a multidisciplinary research initiative involving more than 30 partner organizations working to assess both social and ecological dimensions of land-use sustainability in eastern Brazilian Amazonia. The research approach adopted by RAS offers three advantages for addressing land-use sustainability problems: (i) the collection of synchronized and co-located ecological and socioeconomic data across broad gradients of past and present human use; (ii) a nested sampling design to aid comparison of ecological and socioeconomic conditions associated with different land uses across local, landscape and regional scales; and (iii) a strong engagement with a wide variety of actors and non-research institutions. Here, we elaborate on these key features, and identify the ways in which RAS can help in highlighting those problems in most urgent need of attention, and in guiding improvements in land-use sustainability in Amazonia and elsewhere in the tropics. We also discuss some of the practical lessons, limitations and realities faced during the development of the RAS initiative so far.

2 October 2020 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLCecília G. Leal
Cecília G. Leal
GLGareth D. Lennox
Gareth D. Lennox
SFSilvio Ferraz
Silvio Ferraz
JFJoice Ferreira
Joice Ferreira
TGToby A. Gardner
Toby A. Gardner
JBJos Barlow
Jos Barlow
Consider both water and land: When designing terrestrial reserves, it is common to consider the needs of species and systems from a terrestrial perspective, with an assumption that any freshwater systems will benefit as well. Leal et al. tested this assumption by analyzing data from two locations in the Brazilian Amazon and found that it is far from accurate: Terrestrial systems confer little benefit to freshwater systems (see the Perspective by Abell and Harrison). However, the authors also found that integrating the needs of freshwater species into overall reserve planning increased freshwater benefits by 600% while only decreasing terrestrial outcomes by 1%. They argue that reserve planning must take freshwater systems into account if they are to protect across both realms. Science , this issue p. 117 ; see also p. 38