Maaike P. G. Vreeswijk

Dr. Maaike P. G. Vreeswijk

Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 April 2019 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OKOded Kopper
Oded Kopper
CWChris J. de Witte
Chris J. de Witte
KLKadi Lõhmussaar
Kadi Lõhmussaar
JVJose Espejo Valle-Inclan
Jose Espejo Valle-Inclan
NHNizar Hami
Nizar Hami
Hans CleversHans Clevers
Hans Clevers

23 June 2020 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGStefanie de Groot
Stefanie de Groot
RLRieneke T. Lugtenberg
Rieneke T. Lugtenberg
DCDanielle Cohen
Danielle Cohen
MWMarij J.P. Welters
Marij J.P. Welters
IEIlina Ehsan
Ilina Ehsan
ALA. Elise van Leeuwen-Stok
A. Elise van Leeuwen-Stok
Short-term fasting protects tumor-bearing mice against the toxic effects of chemotherapy while enhancing therapeutic efficacy. We randomized 131 patients with HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer, without diabetes and a BMI over 18 kg m−2, to receive either a fasting mimicking diet (FMD) or their regular diet for 3 days prior to and during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Here we show that there was no difference in toxicity between both groups, despite the fact that dexamethasone was omitted in the FMD group. A radiologically complete or partial response occurs more often in patients using the FMD (OR 3.168, P = 0.039). Moreover, per-protocol analysis reveals that the Miller&Payne 4/5 pathological response, indicating 90–100% tumor-cell loss, is more likely to occur in patients using the FMD (OR 4.109, P = 0.016). Also, the FMD significantly curtails chemotherapy-induced DNA damage in T-lymphocytes. These positive findings encourage further exploration of the benefits of fasting/FMD in cancer therapy. Trial number: NCT02126449.

5 October 2015 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDStefanie deGroot
Stefanie deGroot
MVMaaike P. G. Vreeswijk
Maaike P. G. Vreeswijk
MWMarij Jp Welters
Marij Jp Welters
GGGido Gravesteijn
Gido Gravesteijn
JBJan Jwa Boei
Jan Jwa Boei
Judith KroepJudith Kroep
Judith Kroep
Preclinical evidence shows that short-term fasting (STF) protects healthy cells against side effects of chemotherapy and makes cancer cells more vulnerable to it. This pilot study examines the feasibility of STF and its effects on tolerance of chemotherapy in a homogeneous patient group with early breast cancer (BC). Eligible patients had HER2-negative, stage II/III BC. Women receiving (neo)-adjuvant TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) were randomized to fast 24 h before and after commencing chemotherapy, or to eat according to the guidelines for healthy nutrition. Toxicity in the two groups was compared. Chemotherapy-induced DNA damage in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was quantified by the level of γ-H2AX analyzed by flow cytometry. Thirteen patients were included of whom seven were randomized to the STF arm. STF was well tolerated. Mean erythrocyte- and thrombocyte counts 7 days post-chemotherapy were significantly higher (P = 0.007, 95 % CI 0.106-0.638 and P = 0.00007, 95 % CI 38.7-104, respectively) in the STF group compared to the non-STF group. Non-hematological toxicity did not differ between the groups. Levels of γ-H2AX were significantly increased 30 min post-chemotherapy in CD45 + CD3- cells in non-STF, but not in STF patients. STF during chemotherapy was well tolerated and reduced hematological toxicity of TAC in HER2-negative BC patients. Moreover, STF may reduce a transient increase in, and/or induce a faster recovery of DNA damage in PBMCs after chemotherapy. Larger studies, investigating a longer fasting period, are required to generate more insight into the possible benefits of STF during chemotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01304251 , March 2011

1 December 2007 in The American Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAntonis C. Antoniou
Antonis C. Antoniou
OSOlga M. Sinilnikova
Olga M. Sinilnikova
JSJacques Simard
Jacques Simard
MLMélanie Léoné
Mélanie Léoné
MDMartine Dumont
Martine Dumont
GCGeorgia Chenevix-Trench
Georgia Chenevix-Trench

1 February 2019 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMarthe M. de Jonge
Marthe M. de Jonge
AAAurélie Auguste
Aurélie Auguste
Lise van WijkLise van Wijk
Lise van Wijk
PSPhilip C. Schouten
Philip C. Schouten
MMMatty Meijers
Matty Meijers
TBTjalling Bosse
Tjalling Bosse
Purpose The elevated levels of somatic copy number alterations (SCNA) in a subset of high-risk endometrial cancers (EC) are suggestive of defects in pathways governing genome integrity. We sought to assess the prevalence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in EC and its association with histopathological and molecular characteristics. Experimental Design Fresh tumor tissue was prospectively collected from 36 EC, and functional HRD was examined by the ability of replicating tumor cells to accumulate RAD51 protein at DNA double strand breaks (RAD51 foci) induced by ionizing radiation. Genomic alterations were determined by next generation sequencing and array comparative genomic hybridization/SNP array. The prevalence of BRCA-associated genomic scars-a surrogate marker for HRD-was determined in the TCGA EC cohort. Results Most EC included in the final analysis (n=25) were of non-endometrioid (52%), grade 3 (60%) histology and FIGO-stage I (72%). HRD was observed in 24% (n=6) of cases and was restricted to non-endometrioid EC (NEEC), with 46% of NEEC being HRD compared to none of the endometrioid EC (EEC, P=0.014). All but one of the HRD cases harboured either a pathogenic BRCA1 variant or high somatic copy number losses of HR genes. Analysis of TCGA cases supported these results, with BRCA-associated genomic scars present in up to 48% (63/132) of NEEC vs. 12% (37/312) of EEC (P<0.001). Conclusions HRD occurs in EC, and is largely restricted to non-endometrioid, TP53-mutant EC. Evaluation of HRD may help select patients that could benefit from treatments targeting this defect, including platinum compounds and PARP inhibitors.

27 May 2019 in Human Mutation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMichael T. Parsons
Michael T. Parsons
ETEmma Tudini
Emma Tudini
HLHongyan Li
Hongyan Li
EHEric Hahnen
Eric Hahnen
BWBarbara Wappenschmidt
Barbara Wappenschmidt
ASAmanda Spurdle
Amanda Spurdle
The multifactorial likelihood analysis method has demonstrated utility for quantitative assessment of variant pathogenicity for multiple cancer syndrome genes. Independent data types currently incorporated in the model for assessing BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants include clinically calibrated prior probability of pathogenicity based on variant location and bioinformatic prediction of variant effect, co‐segregation, family cancer history profile, co‐occurrence with a pathogenic variant in the same gene, breast tumor pathology, and case‐control information. Research and clinical data for multifactorial likelihood analysis were collated for 1,395 BRCA1/2 predominantly intronic and missense variants, enabling classification based on posterior probability of pathogenicity for 734 variants: 447 variants were classified as (likely) benign, and 94 as (likely) pathogenic; and 248 classifications were new or considerably altered relative to ClinVar submissions. Classifications were compared with information not yet included in the likelihood model, and evidence strengths aligned to those recommended for ACMG/AMP classification codes. Altered mRNA splicing or function relative to known nonpathogenic variant controls were moderately to strongly predictive of variant pathogenicity. Variant absence in population datasets provided supporting evidence for variant pathogenicity. These findings have direct relevance for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant evaluation, and justify the need for gene‐specific calibration of evidence types used for variant classification.