Giorgio Guglieri

Prof. Giorgio Guglieri

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica e Aerospaziale, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 August 2011 in Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LFLuca De Filippis
Luca De Filippis
Giorgio GuglieriGiorgio Guglieri
Giorgio Guglieri
FQFulvia Quagliotti
Fulvia Quagliotti

1 June 2018 in Aerospace Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMartina Mammarella
Martina Mammarella
ECE. Capello
E. Capello
HPH. Park
H. Park
Giorgio GuglieriGiorgio Guglieri
Giorgio Guglieri
MRM. Romano
M. Romano

8 March 2023 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marco RinaldiMarco Rinaldi
Marco Rinaldi
SPStefano Primatesta
Stefano Primatesta
Giorgio GuglieriGiorgio Guglieri
Giorgio Guglieri
Modeling and controlling highly nonlinear, multivariable, unstable, coupled and underactuated systems are challenging problems to which a unique solution does not exist. Modeling and control of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) with four rotors fall into that category of problems. In this paper, a nonlinear quadrotor UAV dynamical model is developed with the Newton–Euler method, and a control architecture is proposed for 3D trajectory tracking. The controller design is decoupled into two parts: an inner loop for attitude stabilization and an outer loop for trajectory tracking. A few attitude stabilization methods are discussed, implemented and compared, considering the following control approaches: Proportional–Integral–Derivative (PID), Linear–Quadratic Regulator (LQR), Model Predictive Control (MPC), Feedback Linearization (FL) and Sliding Mode Control (SMC). This paper is intended to serve as a guideline work for selecting quadcopters’ control strategies, both in terms of quantitative and qualitative considerations. PID and LQR controllers are designed, exploiting the model linearized about the hovering condition, while MPC, FL and SMC directly exploit the nonlinear model, with minor simplifications. The fast dynamics ensured by the SMC-based controller together with its robustness and the limited estimated command effort of the controller make it the most promising controller for quadrotor attitude stabilization. The outer loop consists of three independent PID controllers: one for altitude control and the other two, together with a dynamics’ inversion, are entitled to the computation of the reference attitude for the inner loop. The capability of the controlled closed-loop system of executing complex trajectories is demonstrated by means of simulations in MATLAB/Simulink®.

12 November 2010 in Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LFLuca De Filippis
Luca De Filippis
Giorgio GuglieriGiorgio Guglieri
Giorgio Guglieri
FQFulvia Quagliotti
Fulvia Quagliotti

7 October 2022 in Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FLFausto Francesco Lizzio
Fausto Francesco Lizzio
Elisa CapelloElisa Capello
Elisa Capello
Giorgio GuglieriGiorgio Guglieri
Giorgio Guglieri
In this paper, a survey on distributed control applications for multi Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) systems is proposed. The focus is on consensus-based control, and both rotary-wing and fixed-wing UAVs are considered. On one side, the latest experimental configurations for the implementation of formation flight are analysed and compared for multirotor UAVs. On the other hand, the control frameworks taking into account the mobility of the fixed-wing UAVs performing target tracking are considered. This approach can be helpful to assess and compare the solutions for practical applications of consensus in UAV swarms.

21 June 2023 in Drones
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marco RinaldiMarco Rinaldi
Marco Rinaldi
SPStefano Primatesta
Stefano Primatesta
MBMartin Bugaj
Martin Bugaj
JRJán Rostáš
Ján Rostáš
Giorgio GuglieriGiorgio Guglieri
Giorgio Guglieri
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are gaining momentum in many civil and military sectors. An example is represented by the logistics sector, where UAVs have been proven to be able to improve the efficiency of the process itself, as their cooperation with trucks can decrease the delivery time and reduce fuel consumption. In this paper, we first state a mathematical formulation of the Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP) applied to logistic routing, where a truck cooperates synchronously with multiple UAVs for parcel delivery. Then, we propose, implement, and compare different sub-optimal routing approaches to the formulated mFSTSP (multiple Flying Sidekick Travelling Salesman Problem) since the inherent combinatorial computational complexity of the problem makes it unattractable for commercial Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) solvers. A local search algorithm, two hybrid genetic algorithms that permutate feasible and infeasible solutions, and an alternative ad-hoc greedy method are evaluated in terms of the total delivery time of the output schedule. For the sake of the evaluation, the savings in terms of delivery time over the well-documented truck-only TSP solution are investigated for each proposed routing solution, and this is repeated for two different scenarios. Monte Carlo simulations corroborate the results.