Hendrik Herold

Dr. Hendrik Herold

Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Dresden, Saxony, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 February 2017 in Ecosystems and People
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KGKarsten Grunewald
Karsten Grunewald
BRBenjamin Richter
Benjamin Richter
GMGotthard Meinel
Gotthard Meinel
HHHendrik Herold
Hendrik Herold
RSRalf-Uwe Syrbe
Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
The paper summarises the multiple benefits of urban green spaces for city dwellers and provides an overview of proximity approaches and common key parameters for green-space quantification in cities. We propose indicators for the assessment of the ecosystem service ‘recreation in the city’ on a national scale. The calculation procedure, which takes into account the best available data sets in Germany, is explained. The determination of threshold values regarding green-space standards comprising type, size and distance is crucial to such studies. The results, the degree of provision with public green spaces in all German cities with more than 50,000 inhabitants (n = 182) and their accessibility, are presented. In total, green spaces are accessible for daily recreation for 74.3% of the inhabitants in German cities, which means that underprovision affects 8.1 million city dwellers. Some indicator details are shown for the examples of Wiesbaden and Stuttgart. Finally, we discuss the approach and values of the proposed and quantified indicators in a German and European context.

1 June 2010 in Journal of Spatial Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Prashanth MarpuPrashanth Marpu
Prashanth Marpu
Marco NeubertMarco Neubert
Marco Neubert
HHHendrik Herold
Hendrik Herold
INI. Niemeyer
I. Niemeyer
Geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) is a promising methodology for image analysis, in which images are first segmented into image segments (or objects) and then analysed based on shape, texture, context and spectral features. The extra dimension of data offered by the objects yields a more enhanced image analysis. The first and most important step is thus the segmentation of images. The effectiveness of the object-based image analysis depends entirely on the quality of the segmentation result. There exist several types of image segmentation algorithms developed for a variety of applications ranging from medical imaging to remote sensing image analysis. It is, therefore, necessary to have an evaluation measure to decide which algorithm can be better for a particular task. Like segmentation itself, there is no standard way of evaluating segmentation results. In this article, we provide an easy way to analyse segmentation results by defining what qualifies as under-segmentation and over-segmentation while analysing the segmentation results of user-selected reference regions. The evaluation criteria are designed to handle the results of multi-level segmentation algorithms, which are commonly used in GEOBIA.

1 November 2009 in Building Research & Information
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GMGotthard Meinel
Gotthard Meinel
RHRobert Hecht
Robert Hecht
HHHendrik Herold
Hendrik Herold

8 August 2008
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
Marco NeubertMarco Neubert
Marco Neubert
HHHendrik Herold
Hendrik Herold
GMG. Meinel
G. Meinel

1 September 2018 in Land Use Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MJMathias Jehling
Mathias Jehling
RHRobert Hecht
Robert Hecht
HHHendrik Herold
Hendrik Herold

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRobert Hecht
Robert Hecht
HHHendrik Herold
Hendrik Herold
MBMartin Behnisch
Martin Behnisch
MJMathias Jehling
Mathias Jehling
Information on the distribution and dynamics of dwellings and their inhabitants is essential to support decision-making in various fields such as energy provision, land use planning, risk assessment and disaster management. However, as various different of approaches to estimate the current distribution of population and dwellings exists, further evidence on past dynamics is needed for a better understanding of urban processes. This article therefore addresses the question of whether and how accurately historical distributions of dwellings and inhabitants can be reconstructed with commonly available geodata from national mapping and cadastral agencies. For this purpose, an approach for the automatic derivation of such information is presented. The data basis is constituted by a current digital landscape model and a 3D building model combined with historical land use information automatically extracted from historical topographic maps. For this purpose, methods of image processing, machine learning, change detection and dasymetric mapping are applied. The results for a study area in Germany show that it is possible to automatically derive decadal historical patterns of population and dwellings from 1950 to 2011 at the level of a 100 m grid with slight underestimations and acceptable standard deviations. By a differentiated analysis we were able to quantify the errors for different urban structure types.