Karsten Grunewald

Dr. Karsten Grunewald

Leibniz Institute of Ecological and Regional Development (IOER), Dresden, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 July 2014 in Landscape Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OBOlaf Bastian
Olaf Bastian
KGKarsten Grunewald
Karsten Grunewald
Dr. Ralf-Uwe SyrbeDr. Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
Dr. Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
UWUlrich Walz
Ulrich Walz
WWWolfgang Wende
Wolfgang Wende

8 February 2017 in Ecosystems and People
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KGKarsten Grunewald
Karsten Grunewald
BRBenjamin Richter
Benjamin Richter
GMGotthard Meinel
Gotthard Meinel
HHHendrik Herold
Hendrik Herold
RSRalf-Uwe Syrbe
Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
The paper summarises the multiple benefits of urban green spaces for city dwellers and provides an overview of proximity approaches and common key parameters for green-space quantification in cities. We propose indicators for the assessment of the ecosystem service ‘recreation in the city’ on a national scale. The calculation procedure, which takes into account the best available data sets in Germany, is explained. The determination of threshold values regarding green-space standards comprising type, size and distance is crucial to such studies. The results, the degree of provision with public green spaces in all German cities with more than 50,000 inhabitants (n = 182) and their accessibility, are presented. In total, green spaces are accessible for daily recreation for 74.3% of the inhabitants in German cities, which means that underprovision affects 8.1 million city dwellers. Some indicator details are shown for the examples of Wiesbaden and Stuttgart. Finally, we discuss the approach and values of the proposed and quantified indicators in a German and European context.

1 February 2017 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Martina  ArtmannMartina Artmann
Martina Artmann
OBOlaf Bastian
Olaf Bastian
KGKarsten Grunewald
Karsten Grunewald
In the light of ongoing global urbanization and the high pace of resource consumption, there is an urgent need to foster compact cities. Currently, however, we lack integrative guidelines on how to manage trade-offs between urban densification and the provision of green space. Against this background, this study applies the concepts of green infrastructure and ecosystem services to develop a guideline for landscape planning to foster compact and green cities. The guideline was tested on the example of the landscape plan of Dresden (Germany), which foresees a compact city in a green network. Results show that the concepts of ecosystems services and green infrastructure can support urban practitioners in structuring the complex interrelations between landscape planning and compact and green cities. The developed guideline provides an integrative framework for modular landscape planning that: (1) reflects the spatial heterogeneity and properties of urban ecosystems and landscapes; and (2) considers cities as integrated socio-ecological systems. The case study indicates that a more comprehensive perspective of cities and their ecosystem is required, one that connects green with grey infrastructure. Further research should focus on how the green infrastructure concept can be refined to incorporate strategic planning for compact cities.

27 March 2021 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dr. Ralf-Uwe SyrbeDr. Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
Dr. Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
INIna Neumann
Ina Neumann
KGKarsten Grunewald
Karsten Grunewald
BPBrzoska Patrycia
Brzoska Patrycia
Jiří LoudaJiří Louda
Jiří Louda
OBOlaf Bastian
Olaf Bastian
The quality of life in our cities critically depends on the intelligent planning and shaping of urban living space, in particular urban nature. By providing a wide range of ecosystem services (ES), urban nature essentially contributes to the well-being of city dwellers and plays a major role in avoiding common diseases through its positive impact on physical and mental health. Health is one of the most important factors underlying human welfare and is, thus, vital to sustainable development. The ES of urban green space provide other social-cultural functions alongside public health, for example by fostering environmental justice and citizenship participation. Thus, they should always be considered when searching for solutions to urban problems. The aim of this research was to determine the impact of green areas in three selected cities on the health and well-being of people by self-reporting of green areas’ visitors. To this end, we posed the research question: which types and characteristics of urban green space are most appreciated by city dwellers? Based on our findings, we have drawn up recommendations for practices to promote better living conditions. We have also pinpointed obstacles to and opportunities for leisure time activities as well as ways of supporting the public health of citizens.

21 April 2015 in Landscape Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OBOlaf Bastian
Olaf Bastian
KGKarsten Grunewald
Karsten Grunewald
AKAlexander V. Khoroshev
Alexander V. Khoroshev

17 April 2015 in Landscape Online
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
OBOlaf Bastian
Olaf Bastian
CSChristian Stein
Christian Stein
Gerd LuppGerd Lupp
Gerd Lupp
JBJan Behrens
Jan Behrens
CRChristina Renner
Christina Renner
KGKarsten Grunewald
Karsten Grunewald
The paper presents empirical studies on the appreciation of nature and landscape in the Eastern Ore Mountains (Saxony, Germany) by tourism service providers (TSP) and visitors. Attractive landscape and experience of nature are the most important reasons to visit this region and to spend leisure time there. Particularly mountain meadows, raised bogs and mixed forests are highly appreciated. Deforestation, industrial development and the decline of biodiversity would reduce attractiveness for visitors. We also assessed whether the tourism sector is prepared to contribute to the funding of nature conservation and landscape management. Use of general tax revenues is favoured, but other modes would also be accepted, e.g. a nature tax. Willingness to pay (WTP) is ranging between €0.75 and €1.36 per guest per night by TSP, or between €1.06 and €2.73 per day by visitors. With respect to landscape preference and WTP we found in some cases significant differences among visitors, depending on region of residence, age and education level. A major part of the annual costs for nature conservation and landscape could be covered by public funds (taxes), if the results of the WTP approach were understood as a sign of societal demand and a call to action.