This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.
The UN’s 2030 Agenda defined 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In order to ensure the implementation of this global agenda, the UN proposed a systematic follow-up and review through indicator-based tracking and reporting of the progress with statistical and geospatial information toward SDGs at national, regional, and global levels. This has posed many technical and institutional challenges. Although international communities have devoted great attention to this hot topic, most of their work has focused on the conceptual design and preliminary testing. There are very few good practices for a comprehensive measurement and assessment of progress toward SDGs with the integration of statistical and geospatial information at national or local levels. This paper presents the methodology and results of a pioneer project which measured the progress toward SDGs at a local level in China (i.e., Deqing County) by integrating statistical and geospatial information. In this study, a number of technical/institutional issues have been tackled, such as the adoption of appropriate indicators at a local level, availability and acquisition of reliable data sets, and spatiotemporal analysis with a geographical perspective, interaction between SDGs and cross-sector coordination. The major conclusions are (a) the comprehensive progress toward SDGs in Deqing can be most appropriately measured and assessed by integrating geospatial and statistical information; (b) Deqing has made significant economic and social advances while maintaining a good ecological environment over the past few years. The results were released at the first United Nations World Geospatial Information Congress as a good practice and a live example to stimulate discussions.
Jun Chen; Shu Peng; Hao Chen; Xuesheng Zhao; Yuejing Ge; Zhilin Li. A Comprehensive Measurement of Progress toward Local SDGs with Geospatial Information: Methodology and Lessons Learned. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2020, 9, 522 .
AMA StyleJun Chen, Shu Peng, Hao Chen, Xuesheng Zhao, Yuejing Ge, Zhilin Li. A Comprehensive Measurement of Progress toward Local SDGs with Geospatial Information: Methodology and Lessons Learned. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2020; 9 (9):522.
Chicago/Turabian StyleJun Chen; Shu Peng; Hao Chen; Xuesheng Zhao; Yuejing Ge; Zhilin Li. 2020. "A Comprehensive Measurement of Progress toward Local SDGs with Geospatial Information: Methodology and Lessons Learned." ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9, no. 9: 522.
The investigation of intergovernmental conferences is an important lens to examine international geopolitical issues that seem to remain understudied in the existing literature, especially from the perspective of how emerging countries shape their discourse, image, and geopolitical imaginations through such conferences. This paper aims to read China’s relationships with the outside world from both its holding and participating in intergovernmental conferences between 2002 to 2017. Based on the textual analysis of conference materials from 919 intergovernmental conferences in which China has been involved, this paper highlights three lines with which China’s self-definition of its geopolitical positions in international politics can be understood. First, China’s delicate balance between the United States and Russia consists of the most fundamental structure of Chinese geopolitical views; second, China’s self-construction as a responsible regional power also makes up a large portion of China’s geopolitical view; third, the crucial role of intergovernmental conferences for the Chinese government is to convey China’s nonthreatening model of development, which is also the most important principle of China’s foreign relations. This paper helps to understand how China constructs its international relations and shapes international discourse and image through intergovernmental conferences. Such conference-based and self-defined geopolitics has furnished a special and, most importantly, a Chinese-styled geopolitical view that can further the understanding of international politics.
Yu Huang; Ning An; Yuejing Ge. READING CHINA’S SELF-DEFINITION OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICS FROM INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCES. Geographical Review 2020, 111, 57 -75.
AMA StyleYu Huang, Ning An, Yuejing Ge. READING CHINA’S SELF-DEFINITION OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICS FROM INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCES. Geographical Review. 2020; 111 (1):57-75.
Chicago/Turabian StyleYu Huang; Ning An; Yuejing Ge. 2020. "READING CHINA’S SELF-DEFINITION OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICS FROM INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCES." Geographical Review 111, no. 1: 57-75.
With the continuous advancement of the Belt and Road Initiative, countries along the Belt and Road are becoming the most important geo-economic space for China’s peaceful rise. This paper constructs a geo-economic model to measure the geo-economic relations between China and countries along the Belt and Road, analyzes the spatial-temporal patterns of geo-economic flow between China and these countries, and discusses the spatial agglomeration of geo-economic flow between China and these countries. The results show that the geo-economic flow between China and the countries along the Belt and Road is increasing and the geo-economic relations between China and these countries are continuing to improve. Trade flow is far greater than investment flow, and China’s geo-economic relations with these countries have mainly relied on trade flow. The spatial differentiation of geo-economic flow between China and countries along the Belt and Road is significant. The development of geo-economic relations is unbalanced, and regional powers play an important role. The geo-economic center of gravity of China and countries along the Belt and Road was moving in the northeastern part of India and it first moved to the northwest and then to the southeast. China’s geo-economic space has obvious core-peripheral structure characteristics, and Southeast Asia is the core area of China’s geo-economic space. China’s geo-economic space presents a northwest-southeast pattern in the direction. There has been a significant, positive spatial autocorrelation in geo-economic flow between China and the countries along the Belt and Road, but the overall spatial agglomeration has been weak. The geo-economic flow agglomerations of China and these countries have mainly occurred in Southeast Asia, and the main agglomeration type has been high–high. The geo-economic activities of China and Southeast Asia had certain spatial spillover effects. To promote the sustainable development of China’s geo-economic relations with the countries along the Belt and Road, China should upgrade investment networks with these countries, optimize geo-economic relations with regional powers, and promote the full development of trade flow, investment flow and other geo-economic element flow.
Wei Hu; Yuejing Ge; Qin Dang; Yu Huang; Yuan Hu; Shuai Ye; Shufang Wang. Analysis of the Development Level of Geo-Economic Relations between China and Countries along the Belt and Road. Sustainability 2020, 12, 816 .
AMA StyleWei Hu, Yuejing Ge, Qin Dang, Yu Huang, Yuan Hu, Shuai Ye, Shufang Wang. Analysis of the Development Level of Geo-Economic Relations between China and Countries along the Belt and Road. Sustainability. 2020; 12 (3):816.
Chicago/Turabian StyleWei Hu; Yuejing Ge; Qin Dang; Yu Huang; Yuan Hu; Shuai Ye; Shufang Wang. 2020. "Analysis of the Development Level of Geo-Economic Relations between China and Countries along the Belt and Road." Sustainability 12, no. 3: 816.
As one of the most striking topics in the contemporary world economy, the discussion on globalization seems to take capitalism as the main dynamic mechanism for its practice process, i.e., capital-driven globalization. Although many researchers have proposed other alternative solutions that are crucial to the development of globalization, relevant research is still very insufficient. Based on this point, this study aims to explore the driving forces, action mechanisms, manifestations, and influences of the contemporary globalization process in a more comprehensive way, particularly focusing on the dynamic mechanisms of globalization other than capitalism, and trying to explain the interaction between various dynamic mechanisms. Overall, this paper summarizes three major (but not all) dynamic mechanisms of the contemporary globalization: capital-driven, state-driven, and inter-state cooperation-driven. These three dynamic mechanisms act on different spaces in different ways, exert different influences, and have profound interactive relations on the process of globalization. By showing a more comprehensive picture of globalization, this study attempts to explain the existing alternatives to capital-driven globalization, and encourages a more in-depth discussion of anti-globalization and regional integration as alternative options for globalization from the perspective of internal operation mechanism.
Yu Huang; Yuejing Ge; Wei Hu. Multiple Dynamic Mechanisms of Globalization: Alternatives to Capitalism. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5344 .
AMA StyleYu Huang, Yuejing Ge, Wei Hu. Multiple Dynamic Mechanisms of Globalization: Alternatives to Capitalism. Sustainability. 2019; 11 (19):5344.
Chicago/Turabian StyleYu Huang; Yuejing Ge; Wei Hu. 2019. "Multiple Dynamic Mechanisms of Globalization: Alternatives to Capitalism." Sustainability 11, no. 19: 5344.
With the rise of China and the implementation of the “21st Century Maritime Silk Road” strategy, research on geo-economics between China and ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) countries has become increasingly important. Current studies mainly focus on influencing factors, while there is little consideration about how these influencing factors act on geo-economic relationships. Therefore, this paper explores the key driving forces for geo-economic relationships between China and ASEAN countries by use of the structural equation modeling based on Partial Lease Squares. There are three main findings: (1) Economic factors have the greatest impact on geo-economic relationships and the total path effect is 0.778. Geo-location, geopolitics and geo-culture act on geo-economic relationships directly and indirectly. Their total path effects are 0.731, 0.645 and 0.513, respectively. (2) Indirect effects of geo-location, geopolitics and geo-culture impacting geo-economic relationships are far greater than direct effects. Geo-culture, in particular, has a vital mediating effect on geo-economic relationships. (3) Economic drivers promote geo-economic relationships through market, industrial policy, technical, network and benefit-sharing mechanisms. Political drivers improve geo-economic relationships through cooperation, negotiation, coordination and institutional mechanisms. Cultural drivers enhance geo-economic relationships through transmission mechanism. Location drivers facilitate geo-economic relationships through selection mechanism. We provide new insights on the geo-economic relationships through quantitative analysis and enrich the existing literature by revealing the key driving forces and mechanisms for geo-economic relationships.
Shufang Wang; Xiao Xue; Axing Zhu; Yuejing Ge. The Key Driving Forces for Geo-Economic Relationships between China and ASEAN Countries. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2363 .
AMA StyleShufang Wang, Xiao Xue, Axing Zhu, Yuejing Ge. The Key Driving Forces for Geo-Economic Relationships between China and ASEAN Countries. Sustainability. 2017; 9 (12):2363.
Chicago/Turabian StyleShufang Wang; Xiao Xue; Axing Zhu; Yuejing Ge. 2017. "The Key Driving Forces for Geo-Economic Relationships between China and ASEAN Countries." Sustainability 9, no. 12: 2363.
In the last 30 years, China’s economic power has experienced great changes and has brought about a profound impact on the world economy. This led us to ask a question: do changes in China’s economic power shift the geo-economic relationships between China and its neighboring countries? To answer this question, we researched the evolution of geo-economic relationships between China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries. Using the Euclidean distance method, we explored the changes in these geo-economic relationships between China and ASEAN countries from 1980 to 2014. Our findings resulted in five conclusions: (1) Over time, geo-economic relationships between China and ASEAN countries remained relatively stable. (2) Geographically, the main geo-economic relationships between China and continental ASEAN countries were complementary, while the main geo-economic relationships between China and island ASEAN countries were competitive. (3) Geopolitics and geo-culture were attributed to the changes in geo-economic relationships. (4) The evolution of geo-economic relationships was characterized by path dependence. (5) Geo-economic relationships between China and ASEAN countries could be classified into four types: game type, with high cooperation and competition; complementary type, with high cooperation and low competition; fight type, with low cooperation and high competition; and loose type, with low cooperation and competition. Our findings contribute to improving the understanding of geo-economic relationships.
Shufang Wang; Axing Zhu; Yuejing Ge; Yuli Liu; Xiao Xue. The Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Geo-Economic Relationships between China and ASEAN Countries: Competition or Cooperation? Sustainability 2017, 9, 1064 .
AMA StyleShufang Wang, Axing Zhu, Yuejing Ge, Yuli Liu, Xiao Xue. The Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Geo-Economic Relationships between China and ASEAN Countries: Competition or Cooperation? Sustainability. 2017; 9 (6):1064.
Chicago/Turabian StyleShufang Wang; Axing Zhu; Yuejing Ge; Yuli Liu; Xiao Xue. 2017. "The Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Geo-Economic Relationships between China and ASEAN Countries: Competition or Cooperation?" Sustainability 9, no. 6: 1064.
With the increasing economic importance of the Asia-Pacific Region, the economic interdependence among countries in the region has gradually enhanced. With the continuous opening up of the two countries, Sino-Vietnamese economic relations have also been deepened. However, the export trade between Vietnam and China has been competitive. China and Vietnam seek to dominate or join an agreement that is conducive to their own trade, which also exacerbates the trade competition between the two countries. This paper compares China and Vietnam and analyzes their foreign trade data from 2005 to 2014. By analyzing the competitiveness of export commodities, the trade division effect and spatio-temporal changes of the geo-economic relationship in the Asia-Pacific Region, this study explores Sino-Vietnamese trade relations and compares the pattern of geo-economic evolution between the two countries. The findings show that China and Vietnam have similarities and substitutability in textiles, apparel and footwear in terms of commodity structure. There is already a trade diversion effect between Vietnam and China on these commodities, but it is not substantial. From a geographic perspective, China’s geo-economic relations in the Pacific Rim present an increasingly dispersed trend. However, the spatial pattern of Vietnam’s geo-economy has maintained a low-level and stable spatial agglomeration over the last decade.
Teng Ma; Yuli Liu; Yuejing Ge. A Comparative Study of Trade Relations and the Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Geo-Economy between China and Vietnam. Sustainability 2017, 9, 944 .
AMA StyleTeng Ma, Yuli Liu, Yuejing Ge. A Comparative Study of Trade Relations and the Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Geo-Economy between China and Vietnam. Sustainability. 2017; 9 (6):944.
Chicago/Turabian StyleTeng Ma; Yuli Liu; Yuejing Ge. 2017. "A Comparative Study of Trade Relations and the Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Geo-Economy between China and Vietnam." Sustainability 9, no. 6: 944.
This paper presents a new perspective of national power—sustainable national power (SNP)—emphasizing both the traditional comprehensive national power (CNP) and social and environmental sustainability. We propose a measurement to quantify the SNP based on the measurement of comprehensive national power and a sustainable adjusted index. In addition, density-equalizing maps are adopted to visualize the sustainable national power of countries in order to gain a better understanding for its current state and future development from a cartographic perspective. China and its neighboring countries are selected as a case study area. The results show that China outperforms other countries in most of the CNP dimensions but performs poorly in various SNP-adjusted dimensions within the study area. The composite score shows that China is with the highest regional SNP, followed by Japan, Russia, South Korea and India. Furthermore, time series of cartograms reveal evidence showing power transitions among countries. In addition, the effectiveness of cartograms for cartographic communication is discussed.
Hua Liao; Weihua Dong; Huiping Liu; Yuejing Ge. Towards Measuring and Visualizing Sustainable National Power—A Case Study of China and Neighboring Countries. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2015, 4, 1672 -1692.
AMA StyleHua Liao, Weihua Dong, Huiping Liu, Yuejing Ge. Towards Measuring and Visualizing Sustainable National Power—A Case Study of China and Neighboring Countries. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2015; 4 (3):1672-1692.
Chicago/Turabian StyleHua Liao; Weihua Dong; Huiping Liu; Yuejing Ge. 2015. "Towards Measuring and Visualizing Sustainable National Power—A Case Study of China and Neighboring Countries." ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 4, no. 3: 1672-1692.
Borderland regions are special areas and deserve more attention in global sustainable development. Reliable geo-information and effective analysis tools are requested to support borderlands studies through the integrated utilization of geospatial analysis, web service, as well as the other domain-specific expertise. This paper has reviewed the state-of-the-art of geospatial information sciences, (GIS)-based borderlands modeling, and understanding. From the perspective of GIS, integrated data modeling, comprehensive analysis, and collaborative information service are identified as the three major challenges in this filed. A research agenda is further proposed with four topics, i.e., classification and representation of borderland information, derivation of neighborhood information, development of synergetic analysis, and design and development of a geo-portal for borderlands studies. This interdisciplinary study requires a closer and in-depth collaboration of geopolitics, international relation, geography and geo-spatial information sciences.
Jun Chen; Ran Li; Weihua Dong; Yuejing Ge; Hua Liao; Yang Cheng. GIS-Based Borderlands Modeling and Understanding: A Perspective. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2015, 4, 661 -676.
AMA StyleJun Chen, Ran Li, Weihua Dong, Yuejing Ge, Hua Liao, Yang Cheng. GIS-Based Borderlands Modeling and Understanding: A Perspective. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2015; 4 (2):661-676.
Chicago/Turabian StyleJun Chen; Ran Li; Weihua Dong; Yuejing Ge; Hua Liao; Yang Cheng. 2015. "GIS-Based Borderlands Modeling and Understanding: A Perspective." ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 4, no. 2: 661-676.
The current international society has entered an era of large-scale power transfer. Government interests have gradually transferred from national strength to national influence. As such, how to quantitatively present the fuzzy geopolitical influence (i.e., geo-influence) has attracted greater attention from scholars. The proposed concept of geo-influence conforms to this trend of power structure change in international relations, and provides a reference for national sustainable development on the international stage. This study sets up an index system and a mathematical model of geopolitical influence, and explores the spatio-temporal changes of the geo-influence of China and the United States (US) in South Asia over the past decade. Three primary results are found as follows: (1) In general, the geo-influence of China and the US in South Asia increased between 2003 and 2012. In terms of growth rate, the geo-influence of China in South Asia grew much faster than that of the US; (2) The overall strength and geo-influence show non-linear relationships. Strong national overall strength does not necessarily mean that one country has the strongest geo-influence; (3) National geo-influence is inversely proportional to the friction of distance. The larger the friction of distance is, the smaller national geo-potential is, and vice versa.
Shufang Wang; Yuan Cao; Yuejing Ge. Spatio-Temporal Changes and Their Reasons to the Geopolitical Influence of China and the US in South Asia. Sustainability 2015, 7, 1064 -1080.
AMA StyleShufang Wang, Yuan Cao, Yuejing Ge. Spatio-Temporal Changes and Their Reasons to the Geopolitical Influence of China and the US in South Asia. Sustainability. 2015; 7 (1):1064-1080.
Chicago/Turabian StyleShufang Wang; Yuan Cao; Yuejing Ge. 2015. "Spatio-Temporal Changes and Their Reasons to the Geopolitical Influence of China and the US in South Asia." Sustainability 7, no. 1: 1064-1080.
Combining the theories of politics of scale from political geography, security theory from international relations, and energy security theory, and putting the scale conversion of energy contention, geographical relationship and geo-structure in geo-setting, and the three properties of safety in consideration, this paper rebuilds a geo-energy security evaluation model and uses the model to quantitatively evaluate China’s geo-oil energy security in the Russian Pacific oil pipeline construction from 1995 to 2010. Five results could be drawn as follows: (1) from the aspect of time, an up-surging Geo-oil Safety Index of China in the Russian Pacific oil pipeline construction indicated an increasingly disadvantage of China in the geo-oil contention by politics of scale. If the United States and South Korea are involved, the competition would be further intensified; (2) from the aspect of geopolitical relationship, a general decrease occurred in the Sino-Japan Energy Competition Index, but a specific increase appeared in the competition of energy imports from Russia, by China and Japan individually; (3) from the aspect of regional strategy of energy export, an obvious downward tendency in Energy Export Strategy Index showed that Russia has changed its export destination off of Europe; (4) from the aspect of geo-security, a relatively steady proportion of China’s oil consumption, and a friendly comprehensive strategic partnership of cooperation between China and Russia, reduced the worries of China’s geo-oil energy security to some extent; (5) from the aspect of geopolitical structure, the increasing comprehensive national power in China, driven by rapid economic growth, will intensify the geo-oil competition in Northeast Asia.
Zhiding Hu; Yuejing Ge. The Geopolitical Energy Security Evaluation Method and a China Case Application Based on Politics of Scale. Sustainability 2014, 6, 5682 -5696.
AMA StyleZhiding Hu, Yuejing Ge. The Geopolitical Energy Security Evaluation Method and a China Case Application Based on Politics of Scale. Sustainability. 2014; 6 (9):5682-5696.
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhiding Hu; Yuejing Ge. 2014. "The Geopolitical Energy Security Evaluation Method and a China Case Application Based on Politics of Scale." Sustainability 6, no. 9: 5682-5696.
The clear benefit of international trade comes as no surprise to economic geographers or to most of the readers of this volume. What might surprise readers is how, increasingly, national statistics related to the proportional share of international trade, especially for merchandise, for China and the U.S. appear to be converging. While wealthier nations such as the U.S., Japan, and the EU nations have service-sector domestic economies, services still account for a minority share of international trade. This chapter, then, largely concentrates on the “lion’s share” of international trade; that is trade in manufactured goods with a concentration on the trade history and trade issues for China, the United States, and finally trade between these two nations for the years from 1990 to 2011.
Gregory Veeck; Yuejing Ge. International Trade Issues and Status for China and the U.S. Representing Place and Territorial Identities in Europe 2014, 181 -200.
AMA StyleGregory Veeck, Yuejing Ge. International Trade Issues and Status for China and the U.S. Representing Place and Territorial Identities in Europe. 2014; ():181-200.
Chicago/Turabian StyleGregory Veeck; Yuejing Ge. 2014. "International Trade Issues and Status for China and the U.S." Representing Place and Territorial Identities in Europe , no. : 181-200.
A new geography is transforming how a large quantity of the world’s population lives and works. The Megaregion, a vast expanse of urban, suburban and sometimes even rural territory connected through economic, social, cultural and environmental linkages is a global reality. Megaregions consists of more than 10 million inhabitants and can stretch across national and international political boundaries. These ‘endless cities’ can be found on North America, South America, Europe, Africa and Asia. In this chapter we will explore several Megaregions located within China and the United States of America. These two countries offer interesting case studies from which to begin to understand the importance of Megaregions and the impact they have on the planet. The discussion that follows will attempt to define the unique characteristics and provide a better understanding of the evolving urban geography of Megraregions in each country. It is interesting to analyze this emerging geographic phenomenon in light of the drastically different political and economic realities of the United States and China. As you will discover, both countries have witnessed the development of similar Megaregional structures, but through vastly different circumstances and processes. While, not discussing why Megaregions have become so important for each country, the discussion that follows does provide an excellent overview of this global experience in select Megaregions of China and the United States.
Russell M. Smith; Yuejing Ge; Rudi Hartmann; Xiaoping Dong; Yang Cheng. Megaregions of China and the U.S. Representing Place and Territorial Identities in Europe 2014, 201 -255.
AMA StyleRussell M. Smith, Yuejing Ge, Rudi Hartmann, Xiaoping Dong, Yang Cheng. Megaregions of China and the U.S. Representing Place and Territorial Identities in Europe. 2014; ():201-255.
Chicago/Turabian StyleRussell M. Smith; Yuejing Ge; Rudi Hartmann; Xiaoping Dong; Yang Cheng. 2014. "Megaregions of China and the U.S." Representing Place and Territorial Identities in Europe , no. : 201-255.
Social networking and network socialization provide abundant text information and social relationships into our daily lives. Making full use of these data in the big data era is of great significance for us to better understand the changing world and the information-based society. Though politics have been integrally involved in the hyperlinked world issues since the 1990s, the text analysis and data visualization of geo-events faced the bottleneck of traditional manual analysis. Though automatic assembly of different geospatial web and distributed geospatial information systems utilizing service chaining have been explored and built recently, the data mining and information collection are not comprehensive enough because of the sensibility, complexity, relativity, timeliness, and unexpected characteristics of political events. Based on the framework of Heritrix and the analysis of web-based text, word frequency, sentiment tendency, and dissemination path of the Huangyan Island incident were studied by using web crawler technology and the text analysis. The results indicate that tag cloud, frequency map, attitudes pie, individual mention ratios, and dissemination flow graph, based on the crawled information and data processing not only highlight the characteristics of geo-event itself, but also implicate many interesting phenomenon and deep-seated problems behind it, such as related topics, theme vocabularies, subject contents, hot countries, event bodies, opinion leaders, high-frequency vocabularies, information sources, semantic structure, propagation paths, distribution of different attitudes, and regional difference of net citizens’ response in the Huangyan Island incident. Furthermore, the text analysis of network information with the help of focused web crawler is able to express the time-space relationship of crawled information and the information characteristic of semantic network to the geo-events. Therefore, it is a useful tool to collect information for understanding the formation and diffusion of web-based public opinions in political events.
Hao Hu; Yuejing Ge; Dongyang Hou. Using Web Crawler Technology for Geo-Events Analysis: A Case Study of the Huangyan Island Incident. Sustainability 2014, 6, 1896 -1912.
AMA StyleHao Hu, Yuejing Ge, Dongyang Hou. Using Web Crawler Technology for Geo-Events Analysis: A Case Study of the Huangyan Island Incident. Sustainability. 2014; 6 (4):1896-1912.
Chicago/Turabian StyleHao Hu; Yuejing Ge; Dongyang Hou. 2014. "Using Web Crawler Technology for Geo-Events Analysis: A Case Study of the Huangyan Island Incident." Sustainability 6, no. 4: 1896-1912.