Elvira De Eyto

Dr. Elvira De Eyto

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 July 2023 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Veronica NavaVeronica Nava
Veronica Nava
Sudeep ChandraSudeep Chandra
Sudeep Chandra
JAJulian Aherne
Julian Aherne
MAMaría Belén Alfonso
María Belén Alfonso
Ana Maria Antão-GeraldesAna Maria Antão-Geraldes
Ana Maria Antão-Geraldes
Barbara LeoniBarbara Leoni
Barbara Leoni

9 August 2023 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PHPeter Haase
Peter Haase
DBDiana E. Bowler
Diana E. Bowler
NBNathan Jay Baker
Nathan Jay Baker
NBNúria Bonada
Núria Bonada
SDSami Domisch
Sami Domisch
EWEllen A. R. Welti
Ellen A. R. Welti
Owing to a long history of anthropogenic pressures, freshwater ecosystems are among the most vulnerable to biodiversity loss1. Mitigation measures, including wastewater treatment and hydromorphological restoration, have aimed to improve environmental quality and foster the recovery of freshwater biodiversity2. Here, using 1,816 time series of freshwater invertebrate communities collected across 22 European countries between 1968 and 2020, we quantified temporal trends in taxonomic and functional diversity and their responses to environmental pressures and gradients. We observed overall increases in taxon richness (0.73% per year), functional richness (2.4% per year) and abundance (1.17% per year). However, these increases primarily occurred before the 2010s, and have since plateaued. Freshwater communities downstream of dams, urban areas and cropland were less likely to experience recovery. Communities at sites with faster rates of warming had fewer gains in taxon richness, functional richness and abundance. Although biodiversity gains in the 1990s and 2000s probably reflect the effectiveness of water-quality improvements and restoration projects, the decelerating trajectory in the 2010s suggests that the current measures offer diminishing returns. Given new and persistent pressures on freshwater ecosystems, including emerging pollutants, climate change and the spread of invasive species, we call for additional mitigation to revive the recovery of freshwater biodiversity.

31 March 2003 in Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BMBrian Moss
Brian Moss
DSDeborah Stephen
Deborah Stephen
CACristina Alvarez
Cristina Alvarez
EBEloy Becares
Eloy Becares
WBWouter Van De Bund
Wouter Van De Bund
DWDavid Wilson
David Wilson
The European Water Framework Directive requires the determination of ecological status in European fresh and saline waters. This is to be through the establishment of a typology of surface water bodies, the determination of reference (high status) conditions in each element (ecotype) of the typology and of lower grades of status (good, moderate, poor and bad) for each ecotype. It then requires classification of the status of the water bodies and their restoration to at least ‘good status’ in a specified period. Though there are many methods for assessing water quality, none has the scope of that defined in the Directive. The provisions of the Directive require a wide range of variables to be measured and give only general guidance as to how systems of classification should be established. This raises issues of comparability across States and of the costs of making the determinations. Using expert workshops and subsequent field testing, a practicable pan‐European typology and classification system has been developed for shallow lakes, which can easily be extended to all lakes. It is parsimonious in its choice of determinands, but based on current limnological understanding and therefore as cost‐effective as possible. A core typology is described, which can be expanded easily in particular States to meet local conditions. The core includes 48 ecotypes across the entire European climate gradient and incorporates climate, lake area, geology of the catchment and conductivity. The classification system is founded on a liberal interpretation of Annexes in the Directive and uses variables that are inexpensive to measure and ecologically relevant. The need for taxonomic expertise is minimized. The scheme has been through eight iterations, two of which were tested in the field on tranches of 66 lakes. The final version, Version 8, is offered for operational testing and further refinement by statutory authorities. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

17 March 2015 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSapna Sharma
Sapna Sharma
DGDerek K Gray
Derek K Gray
JRJordan S Read
Jordan S Read
COCatherine M O’reilly
Catherine M O’reilly
PSPhilipp Schneider
Philipp Schneider
KWKara H Woo
Kara H Woo
Global environmental change has influenced lake surface temperatures, a key driver of ecosystem structure and function. Recent studies have suggested significant warming of water temperatures in individual lakes across many different regions around the world. However, the spatial and temporal coherence associated with the magnitude of these trends remains unclear. Thus, a global data set of water temperature is required to understand and synthesize global, long-term trends in surface water temperatures of inland bodies of water. We assembled a database of summer lake surface temperatures for 291 lakes collected in situ and/or by satellites for the period 1985–2009. In addition, corresponding climatic drivers (air temperatures, solar radiation, and cloud cover) and geomorphometric characteristics (latitude, longitude, elevation, lake surface area, maximum depth, mean depth, and volume) that influence lake surface temperatures were compiled for each lake. This unique dataset offers an invaluable baseline perspective on global-scale lake thermal conditions as environmental change continues.

29 September 2016 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RMRafael Marcé
Rafael Marcé
GGGlen George
Glen George
PBPaola Buscarinu
Paola Buscarinu
MDMelania Deidda
Melania Deidda
JDJulita Dunalska
Julita Dunalska
EJEleanor Jennings
Eleanor Jennings
Recent technological developments have increased the number of variables being monitored in lakes and reservoirs using automatic high frequency monitoring (AHFM). However, design of AHFM systems and posterior data handling and interpretation are currently being developed on a site-by-site and issue-by-issue basis with minimal standardization of protocols or knowledge sharing. As a result, many deployments become short-lived or underutilized, and many new scientific developments that are potentially useful for water management and environmental legislation remain underexplored. This Critical Review bridges scientific uses of AHFM with their applications by providing an overview of the current AHFM capabilities, together with examples of successful applications. We review the use of AHFM for maximizing the provision of ecosystem services supplied by lakes and reservoirs (consumptive and non consumptive uses, food production, and recreation), and for reporting lake status in the EU Water Framework Directive. We also highlight critical issues to enhance the application of AHFM, and suggest the establishment of appropriate networks to facilitate knowledge sharing and technological transfer between potential users. Finally, we give advice on how modern sensor technology can successfully be applied on a larger scale to the management of lakes and reservoirs and maximize the ecosystem services they provide.

3 January 2012 in Freshwater Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Eleanor JenningsEleanor Jennings
Eleanor Jennings
SJStuart Jones
Stuart Jones
LALauri Arvola
Lauri Arvola
PSPeter Anton Stæhr
Peter Anton Stæhr
EGEvelyn Gaiser
Evelyn Gaiser
EEElvira De Eyto
Elvira De Eyto