Andrés Camacho_Garcia

Dr. Andrés Camacho_Garcia

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 September 2016 in Journal of Sports Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAngel Gabriel Lucas-Cuevas
Angel Gabriel Lucas-Cuevas
AAlberto Encarnación-Martínez
Alberto Encarnación-Martínez
ACAndrés Camacho_Garcia
Andrés Camacho_Garcia
SLSalvador Llana-Belloch
Salvador Llana-Belloch
PPPedro Pérez-Soriano
Pedro Pérez-Soriano
Tibial accelerations have been associated with a number of running injuries. However, studies attaching the tibial accelerometer on the proximal section are as numerous as those attaching the accelerometer on the distal section. This study aimed to investigate whether accelerometer location influences acceleration parameters commonly reported in running literature. To fulfil this purpose, 30 athletes ran at 2.22, 2.78 and 3.33 m · s–1 with three accelerometers attached with double-sided tape and tightened to the participants’ tolerance on the forehead, the proximal section of the tibia and the distal section of the tibia. Time-domain (peak acceleration, shock attenuation) and frequency-domain parameters (peak frequency, peak power, signal magnitude and shock attenuation in both the low and high frequency ranges) were calculated for each of the tibial locations. The distal accelerometer registered greater tibial acceleration peak and shock attenuation compared to the proximal accelerometer. With respect to the frequency-domain analysis, the distal accelerometer provided greater values of all the low-frequency parameters, whereas no difference was observed for the high-frequency parameters. These findings suggest that the location of the tibial accelerometer does influence the acceleration signal parameters, and thus, researchers should carefully consider the location they choose to place the accelerometer so that equivalent comparisons across studies can be made.

16 October 2023 in Logistics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RGRaquel Soriano González
Raquel Soriano González
Elena Perez-BernabeuElena Perez-Bernabeu
Elena Perez-Bernabeu
YAYusef Ahsini
Yusef Ahsini
PCPatricia Carracedo
Patricia Carracedo
ACAndrés Camacho_Garcia
Andrés Camacho_Garcia
Angel A. JuanAngel A. Juan
Angel A. Juan
Background: This article identifies and examines key performance indicators (KPIs) related to citizen mobility logistics in smart and sustainable urban areas. It begins with a comprehensive literature review to identify essential KPIs, offering valuable insights for both public and private stakeholders, including policymakers and mobility service providers. Drawing from various mobility projects in smart cities, the study extracts common KPIs and best practices. The focus of the paper then turns to Barcelona, Spain, where KPIs that matter most are analyzed. Methods: Using open data from the city council spanning from 2017 onwards, the study provides insights into the evolving mobility logistics landscape. KPIs from other European cities are also considered by utilizing similar open data sources. This comparative analysis provides valuable benchmarks and reveals disparities in mobility logistics. Throughout this investigation, the paper emphasizes the role of data quality in KPI selection. Results: Reliable open data significantly influence indicator choices and present challenges when comparing cities. Remarkably, the findings consistently highlight environmental data as an area requiring attention in sustainable mobility logistics. Conclusions: This paper makes contributions by identifying and examining KPIs relevant to citizen mobility logistics in smart and sustainable urban areas. It offers insights by applying these KPIs to Barcelona and conducting comparative analyses with other European cities. These findings serve as a valuable resource for policymakers, city planners, and mobility experts.

1 September 2019 in Food Quality and Preference
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARA. Rizo
A. Rizo
IJI. Jimenez-Pérez
I. Jimenez-Pérez
ACAndrés Camacho_Garcia
Andrés Camacho_Garcia
SFS. Fiszman
S. Fiszman
PPP. Pérez-Soriano
P. Pérez-Soriano
ATAmparo Tarrega
Amparo Tarrega

28 February 2017 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAngel Gabriel Lucas-Cuevas
Angel Gabriel Lucas-Cuevas
ACAndrés Camacho_Garcia
Andrés Camacho_Garcia
RLRaúl Llinares
Raúl Llinares
JQJose Ignacio Priego Quesada
Jose Ignacio Priego Quesada
SLSalvador Llana-Belloch
Salvador Llana-Belloch
PPPedro Pérez-Soriano
Pedro Pérez-Soriano
Each time the foot contacts the ground during running there is a rapid deceleration that results in a shock wave that is transmitted from the foot to the head. The fatigue of the musculoskeletal system during running may decrease the ability of the body to absorb those shock waves and increase the risk of injury. Insoles are commonly prescribed to prevent injuries, and both custom-made and prefabricated insoles have been observed to reduce shock accelerations during running. However, no study to date has included a direct comparison of their behaviour measured over the same group of athletes, and therefore great controversy still exists regarding their effectiveness in reducing impact loading during running. The aim of the study was to analyse the acute differences in stride and shock parameters while running on a treadmill with custom-made and prefabricated insoles. Stride parameters (stride length, stride rate) and shock acceleration parameters (head and tibial peak acceleration, shock magnitude, acceleration rate, and shock attenuation) were measured using two triaxial accelerometers in 38 runners at 3.33 m/s before and after a 15-min intense run while using the sock liner of the shoe (control condition), prefabricated insoles and custom-made insoles. No differences in shock accelerations were found between the custom-made and the control insoles. The prefabricated insoles increased the head acceleration rate (post-fatigue, p = 0.029) compared to the control condition. The custom-made reduced tibial (pre-fatigue, p = 0.041) and head acceleration rates (pre-fatigue and post-fatigue, p = 0.01 and p = 0.046) compared to the prefabricated insoles. Neither the stride nor the acceleration parameters were modified as a result of the intense run. In the present study, the acute use of insoles (custom-made, prefabricated) did not reduce shock accelerations compared to the control insoles. Therefore, their effectiveness at protecting against injuries associated with elevated accelerations is not supported and remains unclear.

1 March 2011 in Digital Signal Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RLR. Llinares
R. Llinares
JIJ. Igual
J. Igual
ASAddisson Salazar
Addisson Salazar
ACAndrés Camacho_Garcia
Andrés Camacho_Garcia

1 January 2003 in Neurocomputing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JIJorge Igual
Jorge Igual
LVLuis Vergara
Luis Vergara
ACAndrés Camacho_Garcia
Andrés Camacho_Garcia
Ramon Miralles-RicosRamon Miralles-Ricos
Ramon Miralles-Ricos