Background: Previous animal studies have shown no significant vascular injury from pulsed electrical field (PEF) ablation. We sought to assess the effect of PEF on swine coronary arteries. Methods: We performed intracoronary and epicardial (near the coronary artery) PEF ablations in swine pretreated with dual antiplatelet and antiarrhythmic therapy. Intracoronary PEF was delivered using MapiT catheters (Biotronik, Berlin), whereas epicardial PEF was delivered using EPT catheters (Boston Scientific, MA). PEF pulse duration was microseconds (Nanoknife 3.0, Angio Dynamics, NY) or nanoseconds (CellFX, Pulse Biosciences, CA). Results: We performed 39 intracoronary ablations in 10 swine and 20 epicardial-pericoronary ablations in 4 separate swine. Intracoronary PEF was delivered at higher energy compared with epicardial PEF (46 [interquartile range, IQR 20–85] J versus 10 [IQR 10–11] J, P < 0.01). Reversible coronary spasm occurred in 49% intracoronary ablations and 45% epicardial ablations ( P =0.80). At the end study, fixed coronary stenosis was demonstrated in 44% intracoronary ablations (80% for microsecond PEF and 18% for nanosecond PEF) and 0% epicardial ablations. Visible hemorrhagic and/or fibrotic myocardial lesions were observed at necropsy with similar frequency between intracoronary and epicardial PEF (45% versus 50%, P =0.70). Nanosecond PEF (49 ablations in 11 swine), when compared with microsecond PEF (10 intracoronary ablations in 3 swine), resulted in lower energy delivery (21 [IQR 10–46] J versus 129 [IQR 24–143] J, P =0.03) and less incidence of fixed coronary stenosis (18% versus 80%, P =0.04). Conclusions: In the swine model, intracoronary PEF resulted both in significant coronary spasm and fixed coronary stenosis. Epicardial PEF, delivered at lower energy, resulted in reversible spasm but no fixed coronary stenosis.

Background: Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) has recently been recognized as an arrhythmogenic entity. Data on the electrophysiological substrate as well as the outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with MAD is limited. Methods: Forty patients with MAD (mean age 47±15 years; 70% female) underwent catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias. Detailed clinical, electrocardiographic, cardiac imaging, and procedural data were collected. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients who had substrate modification in the MAD area and those who did not. Results: Twenty-three (57.5%) patients had ablation for premature ventricular contractions, 10 (25%) patients for sustained ventricular tachycardia, and 7 (17.5%) patients for premature ventricular contraction-triggered ventricular fibrillation. Mean end-systolic MAD length was 10.58±3.49 mm on transthoracic echocardiography. Seventeen (42.5%) patients had preprocedural cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and 5 (29%) patients had late gadolinium enhancement. Among the 18 (45%) patients who had abnormal local electrograms (low voltage, long-duration, fractionated, isolated mid-diastolic potentials) during electroanatomical mapping, 10 (25%) patients had abnormal electrograms in the anterolateral mitral annulus and/or MAD area. Substrate modification was performed in 10 (25%) patients. Catheter ablation was acutely successful in 36 (90%) patients (elimination of premature ventricular contraction or noninducibility of ventricular tachycardia). After a median follow-up duration of 54.08 (interquartile range, 10.67–89.79) months, premature ventricular contraction burden decreased from a median of 9.75% (interquartile range, 3.25–14) before the ablation to a median of 4% (interquartile range, 1–7.75) after the ablation ( P =0.03 [95% CI, 0.055–6.5]). Eight (20.5%) patients had repeat ablation for ventricular arrhythmias. Substrate modification of the MAD was associated with a trend toward lower rates of repeat ablation (0% versus 26.7%; P =0.16). Conclusions: Patients with MAD have a complex arrhythmogenic substrate, and catheter ablation is effective in reducing recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias. Substrate mapping and ablation may be considered in these patients.

Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an important cause of morbidity and less commonly, mortality in patients with structurally normal hearts. Appropriate diagnosis and management are predicated on an understanding of the mechanism, relevant cardiac anatomy, and associated ECG signatures. Catheter ablation is a viable strategy to adequately treat and potentially provide a cure in patients that are intolerant to medications or when these are ineffective. In this review, we discuss special approaches and considerations for effective and safe ablation of VT arising from the right ventricular outflow tract, left ventricular outflow tract, left ventricular fascicles, papillary muscles, and moderator band.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important comorbidity in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis that portends increased health care utilization, morbidity, and mortality in this already high-risk population. Patients with ESRD have a particularly high stroke risk, which is further compounded by AF. However, the role of anticoagulation for stroke prophylaxis in ESRD and AF is debated. The ESRD population presents a unique challenge because of the combination of elevated stroke and bleeding risks. Warfarin has been traditionally used in this population, but it is associated with significant risks of minor and major bleeding, particularly intracranial, thus leading many clinicians to forgo anticoagulation altogether. When anticoagulation is prescribed, rates of adherence and persistence are poor, leaving many patients untreated. The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may offer an alternative to warfarin in ESRD patients, but these agents have not been extensively studied in this population and uncertainties regarding comparative effectiveness (versus warfarin, each other, and no treatment) remain. In this review, we discuss the current evidence on the risk and benefits of anticoagulants in this challenging population and comparisons between warfarin and DOACs, and review future directions including options for non-pharmacologic stroke prevention.