Massimo Aglietta

Prof. Dr. Massimo Aglietta

Department of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO—IRCCS—Str. Prov.le 142, km 3.95, 10060 Candiolo (TO), Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

54Years (1973-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 March 2018 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MOMichael J. Overman
Michael J. Overman
SLSara Lonardi
Sara Lonardi
KWKa Yeung Mark Wong
Ka Yeung Mark Wong
HLHeinz-Josef Lenz
Heinz-Josef Lenz
FGFabio Gelsomino
Fabio Gelsomino
TAThierry André
Thierry André
Purpose: Nivolumab provides clinical benefit (objective response rate [ORR], 31%; 95% CI, 20.8 to 42.9; disease control rate, 69%; 12-month overall survival [OS], 73%) in previously treated patients with DNA mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); nivolumab plus ipilimumab may improve these outcomes. Efficacy and safety results for the nivolumab plus ipilimumab cohort of CheckMate-142, the largest single-study report of an immunotherapy combination in dMMR/MSI-H mCRC, are reported. Patients and Methods: Patients received nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses) followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks. Primary end point was investigator-assessed ORR. Results: Of 119 patients, 76% had received ≥ two prior systemic therapies. At median follow-up of 13.4 months, investigator-assessed ORR was 55% (95% CI, 45.2 to 63.8), and disease control rate for ≥ 12 weeks was 80%. Median duration of response was not reached; most responses (94%) were ongoing at data cutoff. Progression-free survival rates were 76% (9 months) and 71% (12 months); respective OS rates were 87% and 85%. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements were observed in patient-reported outcomes, including functioning, symptoms, and quality of life. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 32% of patients and were manageable. Patients (13%) who discontinued treatment because of study drug-related AEs had an ORR (63%) consistent with that of the overall population. Conclusion: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated high response rates, encouraging progression-free survival and OS at 12 months, manageable safety, and meaningful improvements in key patient-reported outcomes. Indirect comparisons suggest combination therapy provides improved efficacy relative to anti–programmed death-1 monotherapy and has a favorable benefit-risk profile. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab provides a promising new treatment option for patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC.

1 May 2012 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WGWinette Ta van der Graaf
Winette Ta van der Graaf
Jaen-Yves BlayJaen-Yves Blay
Jaen-Yves Blay
SCSant P Chawla
Sant P Chawla
DKDong-Wan Kim
Dong-Wan Kim
BBBinh Bui-Nguyen
Binh Bui-Nguyen
PHPeter Hohenberger
Peter Hohenberger

10 January 2022 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HLHeinz-Josef Lenz
Heinz-Josef Lenz
ECEric Van Cutsem
Eric Van Cutsem
MLMaria Luisa Limon
Maria Luisa Limon
KWKa Yeung Mark Wong
Ka Yeung Mark Wong
AHAlain Hendlisz
Alain Hendlisz
SLSara Lonardi
Sara Lonardi
PURPOSE: Nivolumab received US Food and Drug Administration approval as a single agent or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan based on CheckMate 142. Presented are results of nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab in the first-line therapy cohort from the phase II CheckMate 142 study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with no prior treatment in the metastatic setting for MSI-H/dMMR CRC were treated with nivolumab every 2 weeks plus low-dose ipilimumab every 6 weeks until disease progression. The primary end point was objective response rate (investigator assessment; RECIST v1.1). RESULTS: Median age of treated patients was 66 years (N = 45). Median follow-up was 29.0 months. Objective response rate and disease control rate were 69% (95% CI, 53 to 82) and 84% (95% CI, 70.5 to 93.5), respectively, with 13% complete response rate. Median duration of response was not reached; 74% of responders had ongoing responses at data cutoff. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were not reached with minimum follow-up of 24.2 months (24-month rates, 74% and 79%, respectively). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of baseline demographic and tumor characteristics, including BRAF or KRAS mutation status. In a post hoc analysis, of 14 patients who discontinued treatment and did not receive subsequent therapy, 10 remained progression-free. Patient-reported outcomes were stable over the treatment period. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 22% of patients; 13% discontinued because of any-grade treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab demonstrated robust and durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as a first-line treatment for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Based on these promising data, randomized studies are warranted.

17 January 2007 in Annals of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giorgio ValabregaGiorgio Valabrega
Giorgio Valabrega
FMFilippo Montemurro
Filippo Montemurro
MAMassimo Aglietta
Massimo Aglietta
Trastuzumab is a humanized mAb directed against the extracellular domain of the tyrosine kinase receptor HER2. Trastuzumab has shown clinical activity in HER2-overexpressing breast cancers and, at present, is currently approved for patients whose tumours have this abnormality, in both the metastatic and the adjuvant setting. Several issues about its optimal use, however, are still unresolved. One of the reasons for these uncertainties lies in the absence of conclusive data about its mechanism of action and possible primary or acquired resistance mechanisms. Therefore, clinical questions such as how to optimize patient selection, how to prevent resistance to trastuzumab, or what is the optimal management of those patients whose tumours progress during treatment still await convincing answers. This review summarises the current knowledge on the preclinical and clinical evidence about the mechanism of action of trastuzumab and on the mechanisms underlying the development of resistance and also briefly discusses their possible clinical implications.

1 April 2018 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMarina C. Garassino
Marina C. Garassino
BCByoung Chul Cho
Byoung Chul Cho
JKJoo-Hang Kim
Joo-Hang Kim
JMJulien Mazières
Julien Mazières
JVJohan Vansteenkiste
Johan Vansteenkiste
ZSZsuzsanna Szalai
Zsuzsanna Szalai

1 February 1989 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FBFederico Bussolino
Federico Bussolino
JWJi Ming Wang
Ji Ming Wang
PDPaola Defilippi
Paola Defilippi
FTF. Turrini
F. Turrini
FSFiorella Sanavio
Fiorella Sanavio
Alberto MantovaniAlberto Mantovani
Alberto Mantovani