Marek Stanisz

Prof. Marek Stanisz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 April 2021 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Przemysław RacewiczPrzemysław Racewicz
Przemysław Racewicz
ALAgnieszka Ludwiczak
Agnieszka Ludwiczak
ESEwa Skrzypczak
Ewa Skrzypczak
JSJoanna Składanowska-Baryza
Joanna Składanowska-Baryza
HBHanna Biesiada
Hanna Biesiada
PŚPiotr Ślósarz
Piotr Ślósarz
In recent years, there have been very dynamic changes in both pork production and pig breeding technology around the world. The general trend of increasing the efficiency of pig production, with reduced employment, requires optimisation and a comprehensive approach to herd management. One of the most important elements on the way to achieving this goal is to maintain animal welfare and health. The health of the pigs on the farm is also a key aspect in production economics. The need to maintain a high health status of pig herds by eliminating the frequency of different disease units and reducing the need for antimicrobial substances is part of a broadly understood high potential herd management strategy. Thanks to the use of sensors (cameras, microphones, accelerometers, or radio-frequency identification transponders), the images, sounds, movements, and vital signs of animals are combined through algorithms and analysed for non-invasive monitoring of animals, which allows for early detection of diseases, improves their welfare, and increases the productivity of breeding. Automated, innovative early warning systems based on continuous monitoring of specific physiological (e.g., body temperature) and behavioural parameters can provide an alternative to direct diagnosis and visual assessment by the veterinarian or the herd keeper.

7 April 2011 in Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMałgorzata Szumacher
Małgorzata Szumacher
ACAdam Cieslak
Adam Cieslak
Pawel ZmoraPawel Zmora
Pawel Zmora
EPEmilia Pers-Kamczyc
Emilia Pers-Kamczyc
SBSylwia Bielińska-Nowak
Sylwia Bielińska-Nowak
JWJacek Wojtowski
Jacek Wojtowski

1 January 2016 in Journal of Food Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAndrzej Przybylak
Andrzej Przybylak
PBPiotr Boniecki
Piotr Boniecki
Krzysztof KoszelaKrzysztof Koszela
Krzysztof Koszela
ALAgnieszka Ludwiczak
Agnieszka Ludwiczak
Maciej ZaborowiczMaciej Zaborowicz
Maciej Zaborowicz
PŚPiotr Ślósarz
Piotr Ślósarz

7 December 2021 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAgnieszka Ludwiczak
Agnieszka Ludwiczak
ESEwa Skrzypczak
Ewa Skrzypczak
JSJoanna Składanowska-Baryza
Joanna Składanowska-Baryza
MSMarek Stanisz
Marek Stanisz
PŚPiotr Ślósarz
Piotr Ślósarz
Przemysław RacewiczPrzemysław Racewicz
Przemysław Racewicz
Humans who care for pigs prefer an environment that not only allows the pigs to express their natural behaviors but also limits the development of aggression and stereotypes. Most of the behavioral and health problems encountered by pigs in barren, conventional conditions are solved by alternative housing systems. However, it is not known whether these systems are advantageous in terms of the performance of pigs. In this work, we review the effects of housing systems on pigs’ behaviors and performance, which are among the major indicators of the welfare of these animals. Research results point out that outdoor systems are more ideal for sows and fatteners than buildings. Nonetheless, outdoor housing is associated with two major effects in both groups: increased activity due to environmental exploration and higher space allowance, and increased incidence of injuries compared to indoor systems. Sows are more active when housed in groups, but they experience an increased frequency of injuries. According to the literature, group-housed sows give birth to healthy piglets with good daily weight gains. The difference in the fattening and slaughter performance of pigs raised indoors vs. outdoors remains unclear, and the results reported so far are inconsistent. Outdoor systems seem to be associated with a higher incidence of osteochondrosis and lesions of elbow and hock joints, whereas indoor systems cause a greater degree of body soiling in pigs. Based on the reviewed literature, it may be concluded that outdoor housing helps to solve behavioral issues in pigs but leads to other problems in pig production.

9 July 2013 in European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ACAdam Cieslak
Adam Cieslak
MSMarek Stanisz
Marek Stanisz
JWJacek Wojtowski
Jacek Wojtowski
EPEmilia Pers-Kamczyc
Emilia Pers-Kamczyc
JSJoanna Szczechowiak
Joanna Szczechowiak
MSMałgorzata Szumacher
Małgorzata Szumacher

1 October 2015 in Annals of Animal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSMarek Stanisz
Marek Stanisz
ALAgnieszka Ludwiczak
Agnieszka Ludwiczak
PBPrzemysław Buda
Przemysław Buda
MPMarian Pietrzak
Marian Pietrzak
MBMarta Bykowska
Marta Bykowska
PŚPiotr Ślósarz
Piotr Ślósarz
Basic carcass characteristics, the quality traits of meat and internal organs from 10 fallow deer bucks and 10 does aged from 31 to 32 months were investigated. No sex effects on the bled body weight, meat yield and carcass composition were found. A significantly higher weight of mesenteric and omental fat (by 0.44 kg) was found for does. The combined share of muscle and fat in the carcass parts ranged from 77.9 to 78.5%, and the share of bones from 21.5 to 22.1%. No sex effects were found for the pH and water holding capacity measurements. Venison from males was characterized by a significantly higher thermal drip value (P=0.043) and higher L* (P=0.026), a* (P=0.010) and b* (P=0.036) values compared to does. The extracted fat content was significantly higher for females compared to males (P=0.009). The chemical analysis of deer edible by-products indicated the highest level of protein for the liver (17%), and the highest level of dry matter and fat for the tongue (33-34% and 15-18%, respectively).