Hannu Norppa

Prof. Hannu Norppa

Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

48Years (1979-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 December 2010 in Mutagenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMichael Fenech
Michael Fenech
MKM. Kirsch-Volders
M. Kirsch-Volders
ANA. T. Natarajan
A. T. Natarajan
Jordi SurrallésJordi Surrallés
Jordi Surrallés
JCJ. W. Crott
J. W. Crott
PTP. Thomas
P. Thomas
Micronuclei (MN) and other nuclear anomalies such as nucleoplasmic bridges (NPBs) and nuclear buds (NBUDs) are biomarkers of genotoxic events and chromosomal instability. These genome damage events can be measured simultaneously in the cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome (CBMNcyt) assay. The molecular mechanisms leading to these events have been investigated over the past two decades using molecular probes and genetically engineered cells. In this brief review, we summarise the wealth of knowledge currently available that best explains the formation of these important nuclear anomalies that are commonly seen in cancer and are indicative of genome damage events that could increase the risk of developmental and degenerative diseases. MN can originate during anaphase from lagging acentric chromosome or chromatid fragments caused by misrepair of DNA breaks or unrepaired DNA breaks. Malsegregation of whole chromosomes at anaphase may also lead to MN formation as a result of hypomethylation of repeat sequences in centromeric and pericentromeric DNA, defects in kinetochore proteins or assembly, dysfunctional spindle and defective anaphase checkpoint genes. NPB originate from dicentric chromosomes, which may occur due to misrepair of DNA breaks, telomere end fusions, and could also be observed when defective separation of sister chromatids at anaphase occurs due to failure of decatenation. NBUD represent the process of elimination of amplified DNA, DNA repair complexes and possibly excess chromosomes from aneuploid cells.

18 August 2006 in Carcinogenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Stefano BonassiStefano Bonassi
Stefano Bonassi
AZA. Znaor
A. Znaor
MCMarcello Ceppi
Marcello Ceppi
CLC. Lando
C. Lando
WCW. P. Chang
W. P. Chang
MFM. Fenech
M. Fenech
The frequency of micronuclei (MN) in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) is extensively used as a biomarker of chromosomal damage and genome stability in human populations. Much theoretical evidence has been accumulated supporting the causal role of MN induction in cancer development, although prospective cohort studies are needed to validate MN as a cancer risk biomarker. A total of 6718 subjects from of 10 countries, screened in 20 laboratories for MN frequency between 1980 and 2002 in ad hoc studies or routine cytogenetic surveillance, were selected from the database of the HUman MicroNucleus (HUMN) international collaborative project and followed up for cancer incidence or mortality. To standardize for the inter-laboratory variability subjects were classified according to the percentiles of MN distribution within each laboratory as low, medium or high frequency. A significant increase of all cancers incidence was found for subjects in the groups with medium (RR=1.84; 95% CI: 1.28-2.66) and high MN frequency (RR=1.53; 1.04-2.25). The same groups also showed a decreased cancer-free survival, i.e. P=0.001 and P=0.025, respectively. This association was present in all national cohorts and for all major cancer sites, especially urogenital (RR=2.80; 1.17-6.73) and gastro-intestinal cancers (RR=1.74; 1.01-4.71). The results from the present study provide preliminary evidence that MN frequency in PBL is a predictive biomarker of cancer risk within a population of healthy subjects. The current wide-spread use of the MN assay provides a valuable opportunity to apply this assay in the planning and validation of cancer surveillance and prevention programs.

1 August 2000 in Mutation Research - Reviews in Mutation Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RARichard J Albertini
Richard J Albertini
DADiana Anderson
Diana Anderson
GDGeorge R Douglas
George R Douglas
LHLars Hagmar
Lars Hagmar
KHKari Hemminki
Kari Hemminki
AAAntero Aitio
Antero Aitio

1 October 2003 in Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMicheline Kirsch-Volders
Micheline Kirsch-Volders
TSToshio Sofuni
Toshio Sofuni
MAMarilyn Aardema
Marilyn Aardema
SASilvio Albertini
Silvio Albertini
DEDavid Eastmond
David Eastmond
AWAkihiro Wakata
Akihiro Wakata

1 January 1995 in Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jordi SurrallésJordi Surrallés
Jordi Surrallés
NXN. Xamena
N. Xamena
ACA. Creus
A. Creus
JCJulia Catalán
Julia Catalán
HNHannu Norppa
Hannu Norppa
RMRicard Marcos
Ricard Marcos

1 March 2010 in Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKai Savolainen
Kai Savolainen
HAHarri Alenius
Harri Alenius
HNHannu Norppa
Hannu Norppa
LPLea Pylkkänen
Lea Pylkkänen
TTTimo Tuomi
Timo Tuomi
GKGerhard Kasper
Gerhard Kasper