The concurrent seropositivity of HBsAg and anti-HBs has been described among patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but its prevalence is variable. HBV S-gene mutations can affect the antigenicity of HBsAg. Patients with mutations in the ‘α’ determinant region of the S gene can develop severe HBV reactivation under immunosuppression. In this study at a tertiary liver center in the United States, we evaluated the frequency and virological characteristics of the HBsAg mutations among CHB patients with the presence of both HBsAg and anti-HBs. In this cohort, 45 (2.1%) of 2178 patients were identified to have a coexistence of HBsAg and anti-HBs, and 24 had available sera for the genome analysis of the Pre-S1, Pre-S2, and S regions. The frequency of mutations in the S gene was significantly higher among those older than 50 years (mean 8.5 vs. 5.4 mutations per subject, p = 0.03). Twelve patients (50%) had mutations in the ‘α‘ determinant region of the S gene. Mutations at amino acid position 126 were most common in eight subjects. Three had a mutation at position 133. Only one patient had a mutation at position 145—the classic vaccine-escape mutation. Despite the universal HBV vaccination program, the vaccine-escape mutant is rare in our cohort of predominantly Asian patients.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global public problem despite the availability of an effective vaccine. In the past decades, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has surpassed HBV as the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. The prevalence of concomitant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and NAFLD thus reaches endemic proportions in geographic regions where both conditions are common. Patients with CHB and NAFLD are at increased risk of liver disease progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Due to the complexity of the pathogenesis, accurate diagnosis of NAFLD in CHB patients can be challenging. Liver biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing and determining disease severity, but it is an invasive procedure with potential complications. There is a growing body of literature on the application of novel noninvasive serum biomarkers and advanced radiological modalities to diagnose and evaluate NAFLD, but most have not been adequately validated, especially for patients with CHB. Currently, there is no approved therapy for NAFLD, although many new agents are in different phases of development. This review provides a summary of the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and management of the NAFLD and highlights the unmet needs in the areas of CHB and NAFLD coexistence.

Paraneoplastic syndromes in cholangiocarcinoma

Background: The loss of HBV HBsAg or functional cure is a desirable goal of hepatitis B management. The relative abundances of HBsAg isoforms may offer additional diagnostic and predicting values. To evaluate the clinical utility of HBsAg isoforms, we developed novel prototype assays on the ARCHITECT automated serology platform that specifically detects total-HBsAg (T-HBsAg), large (L-HBsAg), and middle (M-HBsAg) products of the S gene to determine the isoform composition of human specimens from acute and chronic HBV infection and during long-term nucleos(t)ide analog therapy. Results: In the early phase of acute HBV infection, L-HBsAg and M-HBsAg emerged within days and were in parallel to T-HBsAg during the entire course of infection. M-HBsAg levels were consistently higher than L-HBsAg levels. Patients with HBeAg(+) chronic hepatitis B had higher T-HBsAg, M-HBsAg, and L-HBsAg levels compared with HBeAg(−) patients. Correlations of M-HBsAg and L-HBsAg to T-HBsAg were similar in both. In contrast, there was no strong correlation between L-HBsAg or M-HBsAg with HBV DNA levels. During long-term nucleos(t)ide analog treatment, changes in HBsAg isoform abundance were proportional to T-HBsAg regardless of treatment responses for both HBeAg(+) and HBeAg(−) chronic hepatitis B. A larger sample size may be necessary to detect a significant difference. Conclusion: HBsAg isoform compositions parallel T-HBsAg levels in both acute and chronic hepatitis B infection. L-HBsAg and M-HBsAg individual biomarkers do not appear to provide an additional diagnostic benefit for staging chronic disease or monitoring response to treatment with current therapies.