TIANGANG YIN

Dr. TIANGANG YIN

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Rd, Greenbelt, MD 20771
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2019 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JQJianbo Qi
Jianbo Qi
DXDonghui Xie
Donghui Xie
TYTIANGANG YIN
TIANGANG YIN
GYGuangjian Yan
Guangjian Yan
JGJean Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry
Jean Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry
LNLeslie K. Norford
Leslie K. Norford

5 February 2015 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJean Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry
Jean Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry
TYTIANGANG YIN
TIANGANG YIN
NLNicolas Lauret
Nicolas Lauret
TCThomas Cajgfinger
Thomas Cajgfinger
TGTristan Gregoire
Tristan Gregoire
TRThomas Ristorcelli
Thomas Ristorcelli
Satellite and airborne optical sensors are increasingly used by scientists, and policy makers, and managers for studying and managing forests, agriculture crops, and urban areas. Their data acquired with given instrumental specifications (spectral resolution, viewing direction, sensor field-of-view, etc.) and for a specific experimental configuration (surface and atmosphere conditions, sun direction, etc.) are commonly translated into qualitative and quantitative Earth surface parameters. However, atmosphere properties and Earth surface 3D architecture often confound their interpretation. Radiative transfer models capable of simulating the Earth and atmosphere complexity are, therefore, ideal tools for linking remotely sensed data to the surface parameters. Still, many existing models are oversimplifying the Earth-atmosphere system interactions and their parameterization of sensor specifications is often neglected or poorly considered. The Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART) model is one of the most comprehensive physically based 3D models simulating the Earth-atmosphere radiation interaction from visible to thermal infrared wavelengths. It has been developed since 1992. It models optical signals at the entrance of imaging radiometers and laser scanners on board of satellites and airplanes, as well as the 3D radiative budget, of urban and natural landscapes for any experimental configuration and instrumental specification. It is freely distributed for research and teaching activities. This paper presents DART physical bases and its latest functionality for simulating imaging spectroscopy of natural and urban landscapes with atmosphere, including the perspective projection of airborne acquisitions and LIght Detection And Ranging (LIDAR) waveform and photon counting signals.

14 April 2017 in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJean Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry
Jean Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry
NLNicolas Lauret
Nicolas Lauret
TYTIANGANG YIN
TIANGANG YIN
LLLucas Landier
Lucas Landier
AKAbdelaziz Kallel
Abdelaziz Kallel
ZMZina Mitraka
Zina Mitraka
To better understand the life-essential cycles and processes of our planet and to further develop remote sensing (RS) technology, there is an increasing need for models that simulate the radiative budget (RB) and RS acquisitions of urban and natural landscapes using physical approaches and considering the three-dimensional (3-D) architecture of Earth surfaces. Discrete anisotropic radiative transfer (DART) is one of the most comprehensive physically based 3-D models of Earth-atmosphere radiative transfer, covering the spectral domain from ultraviolet to thermal infrared wavelengths. It simulates the optical 3-D RB and optical signals of proximal, aerial, and satellite imaging spectrometers and laser scanners, for any urban and/or natural landscapes and for any experimental and instrumental configurations. It is freely available for research and teaching activities. In this paper, we briefly introduce DART theory and present recent advances in simulated sensors (LiDAR and cameras with finite field of view) and modeling mechanisms (atmosphere, specular reflectance with polarization and chlorophyll fluorescence). A case study demonstrating a novel application of DART to investigate urban landscapes is also presented.

17 March 2021 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Zhijun ZhenZhijun Zhen
Zhijun Zhen
SCShengbo Chen
Shengbo Chen
TYTIANGANG YIN
TIANGANG YIN
ECEric Chavanon
Eric Chavanon
NLNicolas Lauret
Nicolas Lauret
JGJean Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry
Jean Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry
Saturation effects limit the application of vegetation indices (VIs) in dense vegetation areas. The possibility to mitigate them by adopting a negative soil adjustment factor X is addressed. Two leaf area index (LAI) data sets are analyzed using the Google Earth Engine (GEE) for validation. The first one is derived from observations of MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) from 16 April 2013, to 21 October 2020, in the Apiacás area. Its corresponding VIs are calculated from a combination of Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 surface reflectance products. The second one is a global LAI dataset with VIs calculated from Landsat-5 surface reflectance products. A linear regression model is applied to both datasets to evaluate four VIs that are commonly used to estimate LAI: normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), transformed SAVI (TSAVI), and enhanced vegetation index (EVI). The optimal soil adjustment factor of SAVI for LAI estimation is determined using an exhaustive search. The Dickey-Fuller test indicates that the time series of LAI data are stable with a confidence level of 99%. The linear regression results stress significant saturation effects in all VIs. Finally, the exhaustive searching results show that a negative soil adjustment factor of SAVI can mitigate the SAVIs’ saturation in the Apiacás area (i.e., X = −0.148 for mean LAI = 5.35), and more generally in areas with large LAI values (e.g., X = −0.183 for mean LAI = 6.72). Our study further confirms that the lower boundary of the soil adjustment factor can be negative and that using a negative soil adjustment factor improves the computation of time series of LAI.

1 March 2017 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EGEloi Grau
Eloi Grau
SDSylvie Durrieu
Sylvie Durrieu
RFRichard Fournier
Richard Fournier
JGJean Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry
Jean Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry
TYTIANGANG YIN
TIANGANG YIN

1 October 2016 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJean Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry
Jean Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry
TYTIANGANG YIN
TIANGANG YIN
NLNicolas Lauret
Nicolas Lauret
EGEloi Grau
Eloi Grau
JRJeremy Rubio
Jeremy Rubio
GSGuoqing Sun
Guoqing Sun