Objective: This document purpose is to create an evidence-based position statement on the role of metformin therapy in pregnancy complicated by obesity, gestational diabetes (GDM), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Methods: A comprehensive review of international diabetes guidelines and a search of medical literature was performed to identify studies presenting data on the use of metformin in pregnancy. The document was approved by the councils of the two scientific societies. Results: In condition affecting the fertility, as PCOS, metformin use in pre-conception or early in pregnancy may be beneficial for clinical pregnancy, even in ART treatment, and in obese-PCOS women may reduce preterm delivery. In obese women, even in the presence of GDM or T2DM, metformin use in pregnancy is associated with a lower gestational weight gain. In pregnancy complicated by diabetes (GDM or T2DM), metformin improves maternal glycemic control and may reduce insulin dose. Neonatal and infant outcomes related to metformin exposure in utero are lacking. Metformin use in women with GDM or T2DM is associated with lower birth weight. However, an increased tendency to overweight–obesity has been observed in children, later in life. Conclusions: Metformin may represent a therapeutic option in selected women with obesity, PCOS, GDM, T2DM, and in women undergoing ART. However, more research is required specifically on the long-term effects of in utero exposition to metformin.

Background: Globally, the progressive increase in the aging population has led to social and health problems associated with age-related chronic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and sarcopenia. Recent studies have highlighted that sarcopenia and diabetes have a bidirectional relationship. Nutritional therapy is a key element in the treatment of both sarcopenia and diabetes. To date, there are no nutritional guidelines for the management of sarcopenia in T2DM. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a muscle-targeted nutritional intervention in older people with sarcopenia and type 2 diabetes based on the Italian nutrition guidelines. Methods: A total of 211 subjects (117 M and 94 F) affected by T2DM with a mean age of 74 ± 6.0 years were screened for sarcopenia, using EWGSOP2 diagnosis criteria, and enrolled to receive personalized dietary plans with two main targets: a daily energy intake of 25–30 kcal/kg body weight and a daily protein intake of at least 1.1–1.2 g/kg body weight. Results: In total, 34 subjects (24 M and 10 F) were sarcopenic with a prevalence of 16%, which was higher in men. After six months of treatment, handgrip strength increased by 0.83 kg (19.57 ± 5.70 kg vs. 20.40 ± 6.10 kg, p = 0.649), protein intake improved (0.91 ± 0.28 g/kg body weight vs. 1.03 ± 0.40 g/kg body weight, p = 0.115), and the glycated hemoglobin decreased (7.39 ± 0.49% to 6.82 ± 0.98%, p = 0.010). Seven younger subjects had an improvement of sarcopenia with a decrease in HbA1c (7.50 ± 0.59% vs. 6.91 ± 0.79, p = 0.19). The difference over time in the consumption of saturated fatty acids (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.33–1.09, p = 0.096) and simple sugars (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80–1.01, p = 0.090) appeared to be associated with an improvement of sarcopenia status. A total of 177 subjects did not meet the criteria for a diagnosis of sarcopenia, and 148 subjects were assessed. The handgrip strength (26.22 ± 9.36 vs. 26.18 ± 9.24 kg, p0.974) and the glycated hemoglobin (7.21 ± 1.07 vs. 7.27 ± 0.98%, p = 0.735) remained stable over time, while protein intake at six months increased (0.81 ± 0.29 vs. 0.91 ± 0.29 g/kg body weight, p = 0.024). Four people were diagnosed with sarcopenia at follow-up, with a lower handgrip strength test result. These subjects were older and had worse glycemic control (HbA1c + 0.5%). Conclusions: Lifestyle modification is important to prevent or reverse the development of the disease. Nutritional therapy in this population is therefore aimed at meeting all nutritional needs and promoting better glycemic control, in terms of glycated hemoglobin, in order to reduce the development of sarcopenia. Although promising, the intervention requires validation in larger studies with control groups.

Over the last 10 years, the number of women with diabetes during pregnancy has increased steadily. Maternal glycaemic control is the most important factor influencing maternal and neonatal outcomes, and technological advances have become integral to the evolution of diabetes care during pregnancy. However, rapid technological development must be accompanied by the equally rapid dissemination of information. In particular, knowledge of the availability of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems for managing type 1 diabetes in pregnancy, and of glucose continuous monitoring (CGM) systems for gestational and type 2 diabetes, needs to be increased. The AMD-SID Italian Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group, supported by the Technology and Diabetes Study Group, has produced this position paper of expert opinion to review the main international guidelines and current evidence on new technologies for the management of pregnancy in women with GDM, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and to provide detailed suggestions for the use of commercially available systems in clinical practice.

Background: The management of type 1 diabetes in pregnancy with new technologies is challenging. Sometimes the complexity of new-generation systems such as “continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, CSII” and patient or provider preference do not allow their use, so women with type 1 diabetes in pregnancy continue to be treated with subcutaneous multiple-injection insulin therapy using pens. Smart insulin pens are new tools that allow for data collection on insulin dose and time of administration and have additional connectivity features. Objective: To retrospectively describe the use of a smart insulin pen coupled with rt-CGM (InPen^TM system) in three pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes. Methods: Participants used the InPen^TM system in pregnancy and consented to analysis of glycaemic data and pregnancy outcome. Results: An increase in pregnancy specific time-in-range glucose was observed in the three patients related to the duration of insulin action, insulin sensitivity factors, and a pre-set target glucose range for pregnancy. No diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycaemia occurred. Conclusions: We describe practical considerations in three pregnant patients with type 1 diabetes where the InPen^TM system was used with suggestive improvements in the time-in-range.