Sensitive clays are known for producing retrogressive landslides, also called spread or flowslides. The key characteristics associated with the occurrence of these landslides on a sensitive clay slope must be assessed, and the potential retrogressive distance must be evaluated. Common risk analysis methods include empirical methods for estimating the distance of potential retrogression, analytical limit equilibrium methods, numerical modelling methods using the strength reduction technique, and the integration of a progressive failure mechanism into numerical methods. Methods developed for zoning purposes in Norway and Quebec provide conservative results in most cases, even if they don’t cover the worst cases scenario. A flowslide can be partially analysed using analytical limit equilibrium methods and numerical methods having strength reduction factor tools. Numerical modelling of progressive failure mechanisms using numerical methods can define the critical parameters of spread-type landslides, such as critical unloading and the retrogression distance of the failure. Continuous improvements to the large-deformation numerical modeling approach allow its application to all types of sensitive clay landslides.

Beavers ( Castor fiber , Castor canadensis ) are recognized as key ecosystem engineers, influencing river hydrology and geomorphology through dam construction. While their structures are associated with positive impacts like flood attenuation, increased biodiversity and water quality improvements, beaver dams are quickly blamed for exacerbating downstream flooding following their failure during extreme rain events. This study examines two Quebec Superior Court rulings (2008 and 2017) where beaver dam failures were considered responsible for significant property damage in the Port‐au‐Persil watershed, located in the Charlevoix region of Quebec, Canada. Using hydrological and hydraulic modelling (HEC‐HMS and HEC‐RAS), we assessed the downstream impacts of beaver dam failures during extreme rainfall events caused by Hurricane Katrina (2005) and Irene (2011). The results reveal that the failure of beaver dams had minimal impact on peak discharge and water levels downstream. For the Irene 2011 event, a 1D hydraulic model showed incremental flow increases of 11–15% and water level rises of up to 0.23 m near the area affected by the damage. A revised 2D model, incorporating a hypothetical four‐fold increase in dam retention volume, demonstrated only minor changes in water levels (0.05 m), confirming that the observed flooding would have occurred even without dam failure. The 2D simulations further highlight that dam height, rather than retention volume, controls downstream flood wave propagation. These findings challenge the negative perception of beaver dams and emphasize the importance of robust scientific assessments in flood‐related liability cases. The legal implications of Article 105 of Quebec's Municipal Powers Act, which holds municipalities liable for flood damage caused by “obstacles” in rivers, create a risk of widespread beaver dam removal. This study advocates for evidence‐based management practices and public education to recognize the ecological benefits of beaver dams while addressing concerns over their perceived flood risks.