Martin De Kauwe

Dr. Martin De Kauwe


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 August 2020 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AWAnthony P. Walker
Anthony P. Walker
MKMartin De Kauwe
Martin De Kauwe
ABAna Bastos
Ana Bastos
SBSoumaya Belmecheri
Soumaya Belmecheri
KGKaterina Georgiou
Katerina Georgiou
PZPieter A. Zuidema
Pieter A. Zuidema
Summary: Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration ([CO2]) is increasing, which increases leaf‐scale photosynthesis and intrinsic water‐use efficiency. These direct responses have the potential to increase plant growth, vegetation biomass, and soil organic matter; transferring carbon from the atmosphere into terrestrial ecosystems (a carbon sink). A substantial global terrestrial carbon sink would slow the rate of [CO2] increase and thus climate change. However, ecosystem CO2 responses are complex or confounded by concurrent changes in multiple agents of global change and evidence for a [CO2]‐driven terrestrial carbon sink can appear contradictory. Here we synthesize theory and broad, multidisciplinary evidence for the effects of increasing [CO2] (iCO2) on the global terrestrial carbon sink. Evidence suggests a substantial increase in global photosynthesis since pre‐industrial times. Established theory, supported by experiments, indicates that iCO2 is likely responsible for about half of the increase. Global carbon budgeting, atmospheric data, and forest inventories indicate a historical carbon sink, and these apparent iCO2 responses are high in comparison to experiments and predictions from theory. Plant mortality and soil carbon iCO2 responses are highly uncertain. In conclusion, a range of evidence supports a positive terrestrial carbon sink in response to iCO2, albeit with uncertain magnitude and strong suggestion of a role for additional agents of global change.

29 March 2022 in Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NMNate G. McDowell
Nate G. McDowell
GSGerard Sapes
Gerard Sapes
APAlexandria Pivovaroff
Alexandria Pivovaroff
HAHenry D. Adams
Henry D. Adams
CACraig D. Allen
Craig D. Allen
CXChonggang Xu
Chonggang Xu

9 June 2020 in Geophysical Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AUAnna M. Ukkola
Anna M. Ukkola
MKMartin De Kauwe
Martin De Kauwe
MRMichael L. Roderick
Michael L. Roderick
GAGab Abramowitz
Gab Abramowitz
APAndrew J. Pitman
Andrew J. Pitman
Quantifying how climate change drives drought is a priority to inform policy and adaptation planning. We show that the latest Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) simulations project coherent regional patterns in meteorological drought for two emissions scenarios to 2100. We find robust projected changes in seasonal drought duration and frequency (robust over >45% of the global land area), despite a lack of agreement across models in projected changes in mean precipitation (24% of the land area). Future drought changes are larger and more consistent in CMIP6 compared to CMIP5. We find regionalized increases and decreases in drought duration and frequency that are driven by changes in both precipitation mean and variability. Conversely, drought intensity increases over most regions but is not simulated well historically by the climate models. The more robust projections of meteorological drought compared to mean precipitation in CMIP6 provides significant new opportunities for water resource planning.

28 January 2014 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SZSönke Zaehle
Sönke Zaehle
PMProfessor Belinda Medlyn
Professor Belinda Medlyn
MKMartin De Kauwe
Martin De Kauwe
AWAnthony P. Walker
Anthony P. Walker
Michael DietzeMichael Dietze
Michael Dietze
RNRichard J. Norby
Richard J. Norby
Summary: We analysed the responses of 11 ecosystem models to elevated atmospheric [CO2] (eCO2) at two temperate forest ecosystems (Duke and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Free‐Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiments) to test alternative representations of carbon (C)–nitrogen (N) cycle processes. We decomposed the model responses into component processes affecting the response to eCO2 and confronted these with observations from the FACE experiments. Most of the models reproduced the observed initial enhancement of net primary production (NPP) at both sites, but none was able to simulate both the sustained 10‐yr enhancement at Duke and the declining response at ORNL: models generally showed signs of progressive N limitation as a result of lower than observed plant N uptake. Nonetheless, many models showed qualitative agreement with observed component processes. The results suggest that improved representation of above‐ground–below‐ground interactions and better constraints on plant stoichiometry are important for a predictive understanding of eCO2 effects. Improved accuracy of soil organic matter inventories is pivotal to reduce uncertainty in the observed C–N budgets. The two FACE experiments are insufficient to fully constrain terrestrial responses to eCO2, given the complexity of factors leading to the observed diverging trends, and the consequential inability of the models to explain these trends. Nevertheless, the ecosystem models were able to capture important features of the experiments, lending some support to their projections.

7 January 2018 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JDJohn E. Drake
John E. Drake
MTMark G Tjoelker
Mark G Tjoelker
AVAngelica Vårhammar
Angelica Vårhammar
PMProfessor Belinda Medlyn
Professor Belinda Medlyn
PRPeter B. Reich
Peter B. Reich
CBCraig V. M. Barton
Craig V. M. Barton

7 February 2013 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MKMartin De Kauwe
Martin De Kauwe
PMProfessor Belinda Medlyn
Professor Belinda Medlyn
SZSönke Zaehle
Sönke Zaehle
AWAnthony P. Walker
Anthony P. Walker
Michael DietzeMichael Dietze
Michael Dietze
RNRichard J. Norby
Richard J. Norby