Bohumír Strnadel, DrSc.

Prof. Dr. Bohumír Strnadel, DrSc.

Centre for Advanced and Innovative Technologies – VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 2172/15, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 July 2015 in Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RFR. Fajkoš
R. Fajkoš
RZR. Zima
R. Zima
BDBohumír Strnadel, DrSc.
Bohumír Strnadel, DrSc.

3 December 2011 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LHLibor Method Hlavac
Libor Method Hlavac
BDBohumír Strnadel, DrSc.
Bohumír Strnadel, DrSc.
JKJiří Kaličinský
Jiří Kaličinský
LGLucie Gembalová
Lucie Gembalová

4 April 2019 in Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KHKunio Hasegawa
Kunio Hasegawa
BDBohumír Strnadel, DrSc.
Bohumír Strnadel, DrSc.
SUSaburo Usami
Saburo Usami
VLValery Lacroix
Valery Lacroix
Thresholds of fatigue crack growth rates are important characteristics for fatigue crack growth assessment for the integrity of structural components. ASME Code Section XI provides fatigue crack growth thresholds for ferritic steels in air and water environments. The threshold is given as a constant value under a negative stress ratio. However, the thresholds are not clearly defined in the range of negative stress ratios. The definition seems to be maximum stress intensity factors. Besides, the thresholds expressed by the maximum stress intensity factors decrease with decreasing stress ratios. This means that the thresholds under negative stress ratios become unconservative assessments. The objective of this paper is to discuss the definition of fatigue crack growth threshold and to propose the threshold equation for the ASME Code Section XI, based on experimental data obtained from a literature survey.

4 August 2021 in Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KHKunio Hasegawa
Kunio Hasegawa
DDDavid Dvořák
David Dvořák
VMVratislav Mareš
Vratislav Mareš
BDBohumír Strnadel, DrSc.
Bohumír Strnadel, DrSc.
YLYinsheng Li
Yinsheng Li
Fully plastic failure stresses for circumferentially surface-cracked pipes subjected to tensile loading can be estimated by means of limit load criteria based on the net-section stress approach. Limit load criteria of the first type (labeled LLC-1) were derived from the balance of uniaxial forces. Limit load criteria of the second type are given in Section XI of the ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineering) Code, and were derived from the balance of bending moment and axial force. These are labeled LLC-2. Fully plastic failure stresses estimated by using LLC-1 and LLC-2 were compared. The stresses estimated by LLC-1 are always larger than those estimated by LLC-2. From the literature survey of experimental data, failure stresses obtained by both types of LLC were compared with the experimental data. It can be stated that failure stresses calculated by LLC-1 are better than those calculated by LLC-2 for shallow cracks. On the contrary, for deep cracks, LLC-2 predictions of failure stresses are fairly close to the experimental data. Furthermore, allowable circumferential crack sizes obtained by LLC-1 were compared with the sizes given in Section XI of the ASME Code. The allowable crack sizes obtained by LLC-1 are larger than those obtained by LLC-2. It can be stated that the allowable crack size for tensile stress depends on the condition of constraint of the pipe, and the allowable cracks given in Section XI of the ASME Code are conservative.

19 November 2015 in Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VLValery Lacroix
Valery Lacroix
YLYinsheng Li
Yinsheng Li
BDBohumír Strnadel, DrSc.
Bohumír Strnadel, DrSc.
KHKunio Hasegawa
Kunio Hasegawa
A subsurface flaw located near a component surface is transformed to a surface flaw in accordance with a flaw-to-surface proximity rule. The recharacterization process from subsurface to surface flaw is adopted in all fitness-for-service (FFS) codes. However, the criteria of the recharacterizations are different among the FFS codes. In addition, the proximity factors in the rules are generally defined by constant values, irrespective of flaw aspect ratios. This paper describes the stress intensity factor interaction between the subsurface flaw and component free surface and proposes a proximity factor from the point of view of fatigue crack growth rates.

21 March 2019 in Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KHKunio Hasegawa
Kunio Hasegawa
YLYinsheng Li
Yinsheng Li
YKYun-Jae Kim
Yun-Jae Kim
VLValery Lacroix
Valery Lacroix
BDBohumír Strnadel, DrSc.
Bohumír Strnadel, DrSc.
When discrete multiple flaws are in the same plane, and they are close to each other, it can be determined whether they are combined or standalone in accordance with combination rules provided by fitness-for-service (FFS) codes. However, specific criteria of the rules are different among these FFS codes. On the other hand, plastic collapse bending stresses for stainless steel pipes with two circumferential similar flaws were obtained by experiments, and the prediction procedure for collapse stresses for pipes with two similar flaws was developed analytically. Using the experimental data and the analytical procedure, plastic collapse stresses for pipes with two similar flaws are compared with the stresses in compliance with the flaw combination criteria. It is shown that the calculated plastic collapse stresses based on the flaw combination criteria are significantly different from the experimental and analytical stresses.