Ione Avila-Palencia

Dr. Ione Avila-Palencia

Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2021 in Global Environmental Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBChristian Brand
Christian Brand
TGThomas Götschi
Thomas Götschi
EDEvi Dons
Evi Dons
Regine GerikeRegine Gerike
Regine Gerike
EAEsther Anaya-Boig
Esther Anaya-Boig
MNMark J. Nieuwenhuijsen
Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen

13 July 2017 in Current Environmental Health Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OCon behalf of the PASTA Consortium
on behalf of the PASTA Consortium
TGThomas Gotschi
Thomas Gotschi
ANAudrey de Nazelle
Audrey de Nazelle
Christian BrandChristian Brand
Christian Brand
Regine GerikeRegine Gerike
Regine Gerike
Ione Avila-PalenciaIone Avila-Palencia
Ione Avila-Palencia
Purpose of Review This paper reviews the use of conceptual frameworks in research on active travel, such as walking and cycling. Generic framework features and a wide range of contents are identified and synthesized into a comprehensive framework of active travel behavior, as part of the Physical Activity through Sustainable Transport Approaches project (PASTA). PASTA is a European multinational, interdisciplinary research project on active travel and health. Recent Findings Along with an exponential growth in active travel research, a growing number of conceptual frameworks has been published since the early 2000s. Earlier frameworks are simpler and emphasize the distinction of environmental vs. individual factors, while more recently several studies have integrated travel behavior theories more thoroughly. Summary Based on the reviewed frameworks and various behavioral theories, we propose the comprehensive PASTA conceptual framework of active travel behavior. We discuss how it can guide future research, such as data collection, data analysis, and modeling of active travel behavior, and present some examples from the PASTA project.

1 November 2018 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Ione Avila-PalenciaIone Avila-Palencia
Ione Avila-Palencia
Luc Int PanisLuc Int Panis
Luc Int Panis
EDEvi Dons
Evi Dons
MGMailin Gaupp-Berghausen
Mailin Gaupp-Berghausen
ERElisabeth Raser
Elisabeth Raser
MNMark Nieuwenhuijsen
Mark Nieuwenhuijsen
Transport mode choice has been associated with different health risks and benefits depending on which transport mode is used. We aimed to evaluate the association between different transport modes use and several health and social contact measures. We based our analyses on the Physical Activity through Sustainable Transport Approaches (PASTA) longitudinal study, conducted over a period of two years in seven European cities. 8802 participants finished the baseline questionnaire, and 3567 answered the final questionnaire. Participants were 18 years of age or older (16 years of age or older in Zurich) and lived, worked and/or studied in one of the case-study cities. Associations between transport mode use and health/social contact measures were estimated using mixed-effects logistic regression models, linear regression models, and logistic regression models according to the data available. All the associations were assessed with single and multiple transport mode models. All models were adjusted for potential confounders. In multiple transport mode models, bicycle use was associated with good self-perceived health [OR (CI 95%) = 1.07 (1.05, 1.08)], all the mental health measures [perceived stress: coef (CI 95%) = -0.016 (-0.028, -0.004); mental health: coef (CI 95%) = 0.11 (0.05, 0.18); vitality: coef (CI 95%) = 0.14 (0.07, 0.22)], and with fewer feelings of loneliness [coef (CI 95%) = -0.03 (-0.05, -0.01)]. Walking was associated with good self-perceived health [OR (CI 95%) = 1.02 (1.00, 1.03)], higher vitality [coef (CI 95%) = 0.14 (0.05, 0.23)], and more frequent contact with friends/family [OR (CI 95%) = 1.03 (1.00, 1.05)]. Car use was associated with fewer feelings of loneliness [coef (CI 95%) = -0.04 (-0.06, -0.02)]. The results for e-bike and public transport use were non-significant, and the results for motorbike use were inconclusive. Similarity of findings across cities suggested that active transport, especially bicycle use, should be encouraged to improve population health and social outcomes.

23 June 2017 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ione Avila-PalenciaIone Avila-Palencia
Ione Avila-Palencia
ANAudrey de Nazelle
Audrey de Nazelle
Tom Cole-HunterTom Cole-Hunter
Tom Cole-Hunter
DDDavid Donaire
David Donaire
MJMichael Jerrett
Michael Jerrett
MNMark Nieuwenhuijsen
Mark Nieuwenhuijsen
Introduction Active commuting — walking and bicycling for travel to and/or from work or educational addresses — may facilitate daily, routine physical activity. Several studies have investigated the relationship between active commuting and commuting stress; however, there are no studies examining the relationship between solely bicycle commuting and perceived stress, or studies that account for environmental determinants of bicycle commuting and stress. The current study evaluated the relationship between bicycle commuting, among working or studying adults in a dense urban setting, and perceived stress. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed with 788 adults who regularly travelled to work or study locations (excluding those who only commuted on foot) in Barcelona, Spain. Participants responded to a comprehensive telephone survey concerning their travel behaviour from June 2011 through to May 2012. Participants were categorised as either bicycle commuters or non-bicycle commuters, and (based on the Perceived Stress Scale, PSS-4) as either stressed or non-stressed. Multivariate Poisson regression with robust variance models of stress status based on exposures with bicycle commuting were estimated and adjusted for potential confounders. Results Bicycle commuters had significantly lower risk of being stressed than non-bicycle commuters (Relative Risk; RR (95% CI)=0.73 (0.60 to 0.89), p=0.001). Bicycle commuters who bicycled 4 days per week (RR (95% CI)=0.42 (0.24 to 0.73), p=0.002) and those who bicycled 5 or more days per week (RR (95% CI)=0.57 (0.42 to 0.77), p<0.001) had lower risk of being stressed than those who bicycled less than 4 days. This relationship remained statistically significant after adjusting for individual and environmental confounders and when using different cut-offs of perceived stress. Conclusions Stress reduction may be an important consequence of routine bicycle use and should be considered by decision makers as another potential benefit of its promotion.

1 August 2018 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MLMichelle Laeremans
Michelle Laeremans
EDEvi Dons
Evi Dons
Ione Avila-PalenciaIone Avila-Palencia
Ione Avila-Palencia
GCGlòria Carrasco-Turigas
Glòria Carrasco-Turigas
JOJuan Pablo Orjuela
Juan Pablo Orjuela
Luc Int PanisLuc Int Panis
Luc Int Panis
Physical activity (PA) in urban environments may lead to increased inhalation of air pollutants. As PA and air pollution (AP) have respectively beneficial and detrimental effects on the cardiorespiratory system, the responses to these exposures can interact. Therefore, we assessed the short-term effects of PA, AP and their interaction on a set of subclinical cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes in a panel of healthy adults: heart rate variability (HRV), retinal vessel diameters, lung function and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). One hundred twenty two participants measured their PA level and exposure to black carbon (BC), a marker of AP exposure, with wearable sensors during an unscripted week in three different seasons. The study was part of the PASTA project in three European cities (Antwerp: 41 participants, Barcelona: 41 participants, London: 40 participants). At the end of each measurement week, the health outcomes were evaluated. Responses to PA, BC and their interaction were assessed with mixed effect regression models. Separate models were used to account for a 2-h and 24-h time window. During the 2-h time window, HRV and lung function changed statistically significantly in response to PA (METhours) and logarithmic BC (%change). Changes in HRV marked an increased sympathetic tone with both PA (logarithmic LF/HF: +7%; p < 0.01) and BC (logarithmic HF: -19%; p < 0.05). In addition, PA provoked bronchodilation which was illustrated by a significant increase in lung function (FEV1: +15.63 mL; p < 0.05). While a BC %increase was associated with a significant lung function decrease (PEF: -0.10 mL; p < 0.05), the interaction indicated a potential protective effect of PA (p < 0.05). We did not observe a response of the retinal vessel diameters. Most subclinical outcomes did not change in the 24-h time window (except for a few minor changes in LF/HF, FeNO and PEF). Our results on the separate and combined effects of short-term PA and AP exposure on subclinical markers of the cardiorespiratory system are relevant for public health. We provide insights on the physiological responses of multiple, complementary markers. This may move further research towards elucidating potential pathways to disease and the long-term clinical impact of the observed physiological changes.

12 January 2017 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EDEvi Dons
Evi Dons
MLMichelle Laeremans
Michelle Laeremans
JOJuan Pablo Orjuela
Juan Pablo Orjuela
Ione Avila-PalenciaIone Avila-Palencia
Ione Avila-Palencia
GCGlòria Carrasco-Turigas
Glòria Carrasco-Turigas
Luc Int PanisLuc Int Panis
Luc Int Panis