Eva Kemps

Prof. Eva Kemps

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2004 in British Journal of Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AVAndré Vandierendonck
André Vandierendonck
EKEva Kemps
Eva Kemps
MFMaria Chiara Fastame
Maria Chiara Fastame
ASArnaud Szmalec
Arnaud Szmalec

1 November 2020 in Journal of Affective Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJunwen Chen
Junwen Chen
MSMichelle Short
Michelle Short
EKEva Kemps
Eva Kemps

1 January 2017 in Addictive Behaviors
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NKNaomi Kakoschke
Naomi Kakoschke
EKEva Kemps
Eva Kemps
MTMarika Tiggemann
Marika Tiggemann

1 December 2005 in Appetite
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTM. Tiggemann
M. Tiggemann
EKEva Kemps
Eva Kemps

1 September 2017 in Appetite
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EREric Robinson
Eric Robinson
AHAshleigh Haynes
Ashleigh Haynes
CHCharlotte A. Hardman
Charlotte A. Hardman
EKEva Kemps
Eva Kemps
SHSuzanne Higgs
Suzanne Higgs
AJAndrew Jones
Andrew Jones
Because overconsumption of food contributes to ill health, understanding what affects how much people eat is of importance. The 'bogus' taste test is a measure widely used in eating behaviour research to identify factors that may have a causal effect on food intake. However, there has been no examination of the validity of the bogus taste test as a measure of food intake. We conducted a participant level analysis of 31 published laboratory studies that used the taste test to measure food intake. We assessed whether the taste test was sensitive to experimental manipulations hypothesized to increase or decrease food intake. We examined construct validity by testing whether participant sex, hunger and liking of taste test food were associated with the amount of food consumed in the taste test. In addition, we also examined whether BMI (body mass index), trait measures of dietary restraint and over-eating in response to palatable food cues were associated with food consumption. Results indicated that the taste test was sensitive to experimental manipulations hypothesized to increase or decrease food intake. Factors that were reliably associated with increased consumption during the taste test were being male, have a higher baseline hunger, liking of the taste test food and a greater tendency to overeat in response to palatable food cues, whereas trait dietary restraint and BMI were not. These results indicate that the bogus taste test is likely to be a valid measure of food intake and can be used to identify factors that have a causal effect on food intake.

10 February 2023 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KGKerri Marie Gillespie
Kerri Marie Gillespie
EKEva Kemps
Eva Kemps
MWMelanie Jade White
Melanie Jade White
SBSelena E. Bartlett
Selena E. Bartlett
The importance of nutrition in human health has been understood for over a century. However, debate is ongoing regarding the role of added and free sugars in physiological and neurological health. In this narrative review, we have addressed several key issues around this debate and the major health conditions previously associated with sugar. We aim to determine the current evidence regarding the role of free sugars in human health, specifically obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, cognition, and mood. We also present some predominant theories on mechanisms of action. The findings suggest a negative effect of excessive added sugar consumption on human health and wellbeing. Specific class and source of carbohydrate appears to greatly influence the impact of these macronutrients on health. Further research into individual effects of carbohydrate forms in diverse populations is needed to understand the complex relationship between sugar and health.