In 2022, the Lithuanian health authorities decided to pay general practitioners a fee for performing serological tests for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies in the population born from 1945 to 1994 once per life and annual HCV testing for PWID and HIV infected patients. This study aimed to assess trends in HCV-related mortality in the country and the prevalence of HCV infection among patients with liver diseases and evaluate possibilities of screening for HCV infection at a primary health care center. Age-standardized mortality rates in 2010–2020 were calculated for deaths caused by chronic hepatitis C and some liver diseases. Data on HCV infection among patients with liver cirrhosis, cancer and transplant patients were collected from the tertiary care hospital Kauno Klinikos. The prevalence of anti-HCV and risk factors of HCV infection was assessed among patients registered with the health care center in Klaipeda, where a pilot study of screening was performed. No steady trend in mortality was observed. Analysis of medical documentation showed that 40.5% of patients with liver cirrhosis, 49.7% with cancers and 36.9% of transplant patients were HCV infected. Over the year, 4867 patients were screened in the primary health care center. Positive anti-HCV prevalence was 1.7% (2.1% in men and 1.3% in women). Blood transfusion and being a blood donor before 1993 also having tattoos were associated with higher odds of HCV infection. The study revealed the active participation of individuals in HCV screening.

Background and Objectives: Although multimorbidity poses many challenges for both individuals and healthcare systems, information on how these patients assess the quality of their healthcare is lacking. This study assessed the multimorbid patients’ satisfaction with their healthcare. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was a part of a project Joint Action—Chronic Diseases and Promoting Healthy Ageing across the Life Cycle and its implementation. The study included 400 patients with arterial hypertension and at least one concomitant chronic disease. Patients completed The Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions Plus (PACIC+) questionnaire, EuroQol Five-Dimensions—Three-Level Quality of Life questionnaire, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale. Results: The mean age of the participants was 65.38 years; there were 52.5% women. The mean PACIC+ 5As summary score was 3.60. With increasing age, participants rated worse on most PACIC+ subscales. Participants who assessed their quality of life as worse were also less satisfied with their healthcare. The presence of three or more concomitant diseases negatively affected PACIC+ scores. Patients with ischemic heart disease and heart failure had lower PACIC+ scores on most subscales, whereas patients with atrial fibrillation had lower scores only on the Agree subscale. The presence of diabetes was not associated with worse PACIC+ scores; moreover, the scores in Assist and Arrange subscales were even better in diabetic patients (3.36 vs. 2.80, p = 0.000 and 3.69 vs. 3.13, p = 0.008, respectively). Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and musculoskeletal disorders showed lower PACIC+ scores. Conclusions: Older age, worse self-assessed health state, presence of three or more diseases, and certain chronic diseases were associated with lower patients’ satisfaction with their healthcare. Personalized healthcare, increasing competencies of primary healthcare teams, healthcare services accessibility, and financial motivation of healthcare providers may increase multimorbid patients’ satisfaction with their healthcare.

Background and Objectives: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a marker of cardiovascular risk and its management. This study evaluated LDL-C control trends in patients treated at a single healthcare centre in Lithuania. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted at the primary healthcare centre Saulės šeimos medicinos centras. Five-year (2019-2023) data on patients aged 40 years or older diagnosed with dyslipidaemia were extracted from a real-world data and analytics platform TriNetX. For analysis, patients were grouped into three groups: patients with dyslipidaemia only (control group), patients with dyslipidaemia and diabetes, and patients with dyslipidaemia and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The following LDL-C goals were used for analysis: < 1.4 mmol/L (a goal for very-high-risk patients in primary or secondary prevention), < 1.8 mmol/L (a goal for high-risk patients), and < 3.0 mmol/L (a goal for low-risk patients). Results: There were 18646 patients with dyslipidaemia. Of them, 8.9% of patients had diabetes and 3.1% of patients had CVD. The median LDL-C concentration was significantly lower in patients with diabetes (2.82 mmol/L, p < 0.05) and in patients with CVD (2.45 mmol/L, p < 0.05) than in the control group (3.35 mmol/L). A trend of decreasing median LDL-C over the years was observed in all groups, with the lowest median values in 2023. The proportion of patients with LDL-C level < 3 mmol/L increased from 32.0% in 2019 to 41.5% in 2023. The proportion of diabetic patients achieving LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L increased from 7.4% to 25.9% and those achieving LDL-C < 1.4 mmol/L increased from 3.1% to 10.6%. The proportion of patients with CVD achieving LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L increased from 14.2% to 36.6% and those achieving LDL-C < 1.4 mmol/L increased from 3.0% to 14.0%. Conclusions: Trends in the control of LDL-C levels are positive over 5 years, but a significant proportion of patients still did not reach the recommended target levels.

Background and Objectives: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a marker of cardiovascular risk and its management. This study evaluated LDL-C control trends in patients treated at a primary healthcare center in Lithuania. Materials and Methods: Five-year (2019–2023) data on patients aged 40 years or older diagnosed with dyslipidemia were extracted from a real-world data and analytics platform, TriNetX. Patients were grouped into three groups: patients with dyslipidemia only (control group), patients with dyslipidemia and diabetes, and patients with dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The following LDL-C goals were used for analysis: <1.4 mmol/L (a goal for very-high-risk patients in primary or secondary prevention), <1.8 mmol/L (a goal for high-risk patients), and <3.0 mmol/L (a goal for low-risk patients). Results: There were 18,646 patients with dyslipidemia. Of them, 8.9% of patients had diabetes, and 3.1% of patients had CVD. The median LDL-C concentration was significantly lower in patients with diabetes (2.82 mmol/L, p < 0.05) and in patients with CVD (2.45 mmol/L, p < 0.05) than in the control group (3.35 mmol/L). A trend of decreasing median LDL-C over the years was observed in all groups, with the lowest median values in 2023. The proportion of patients with LDL-C levels < 3 mmol/L increased from 32.0% in 2019 to 41.5% in 2023. The proportion of diabetic patients achieving LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L increased from 7.4% to 25.9%, and those achieving LDL-C < 1.4 mmol/L increased from 3.1% to 10.6%. The proportion of patients with CVD achieving LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L increased from 14.2% to 36.6%, and those achieving LDL-C < 1.4 mmol/L increased from 3.0% to 14.0%. Conclusions: Trends in the control of LDL-C levels are positive over 5 years, but a significant proportion of patients still did not reach the recommended target levels.

Background and Objectives: Cardiovascular–kidney–metabolic (CKM) syndrome reflects the interconnection between metabolic risk factors, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Despite increasing awareness, population-based data on CKM syndrome are limited, particularly in Europe. This study assessed the prevalence of CKM syndrome and the use of renal and cardiac biomarkers in Lithuania. Materials and Methods: Health records of 923,329 adults aged ≥40 years from the national Electronic Health Services and Cooperation Infrastructure Information System were analyzed. CKM-associated conditions (prediabetes/type 2 diabetes, obesity, CKD) and cardiovascular outcomes (atherosclerotic CVD, peripheral vascular disease, stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation) were identified. CKM stages were defined as stage 0 (no CKM conditions), stages 1–3 (at least one CKM condition), and stage 4 (at least one CVD diagnosis). The use of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) and N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) testing was evaluated. Results: Overall, 34.8% of adults met criteria for stage 4 CKM syndrome, and 23.4% were classified as stage 1–3. Obesity (21.2%) and type 2 diabetes (17.2%) were the most common CKM-associated conditions. Heart failure (25.4%) and atrial fibrillation (14.0%) were the most common cardiovascular outcomes, with ≥2 CVD diagnoses present in 15.4% of patients. Among stage 1–3 patients, eGFR, ACR, and NT-proBNP were measured in 53.5%, 9.0%, and 4.9%, respectively. Conclusions: A third of Lithuanian adults aged ≥40 years had stage 4 CKM syndrome. The underuse of biomarker testing highlights missed opportunities for early detection. Broader implementation of biomarker testing and integrated care is warranted to slow progression of CKM syndrome and reduce cardiovascular risk.

Background and Objectives: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction is critical for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. This study aimed to assess the proportion of patients achieving the LDL-C target in Lithuania and to identify factors associated with target achievement. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used anonymized health data from the Electronic Health Services and Cooperation Infrastructure Information System (ESPBI IS) in Lithuania. Adults aged ≥40 years with at least one LDL-C measurement in 2023 and no documented cancer diagnosis were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L, the target recommended by the European Society of Cardiology guidelines for high-risk individuals. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with achieving the LDL-C target. Results: The study included 396,835 patients (mean age, 66.9 years). The mean LDL-C concentration was 3.32 mmol/L, and only 8.1% of patients achieved LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L. Target achievement was higher among patients in the secondary CVD prevention group compared to primary prevention (20.6% vs. 7.3%). Over half of patients (56.4%) received no lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Statin monotherapy was the most prescribed LLT (31.3%), while only 2.7% of patients received statin and ezetimibe combination. In logistic regression analysis, secondary prevention status, more frequent cardiologist consultations, and higher LLT prescription frequency were associated with LDL-C target achievement. Compared to patients not receiving LLT, the odds of achieving LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L were significantly higher in those receiving statin monotherapy (odds ratio [OR]: 3.153, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.069–3.240), statin and ezetimibe (OR: 7.631, 95% CI: 7.267–8.013), or statin and antihypertensive (OR: 3.945, 95% CI: 3.803–4.092). Conclusions: LDL-C target attainment remains low in Lithuania, with the underuse of LLT. Broader implementation of guideline-recommended lipid-lowering strategies is needed to improve LDL-C control.