Stefan van Drongelen

Dr. Stefan van Drongelen

Orthopaedic University Hospital Friedrichsheim gGmbH
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2005 in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDStefan van Drongelen
Stefan van Drongelen
LWLucas H. van der Woude
Lucas H. van der Woude
TJThomas W. Janssen
Thomas W. Janssen
EAEdmond L. Angenot
Edmond L. Angenot
ECEdward K. Chadwick
Edward K. Chadwick
H.E.J. (DirkJan) VeegerH.E.J. (DirkJan) Veeger
H.E.J. (DirkJan) Veeger

6 September 2005 in Spinal Cord
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDStefan van Drongelen
Stefan van Drongelen
SGS de Groot
S de Groot
HVH E J Veeger
H E J Veeger
EAE L D Angenot
E L D Angenot
ADA J Dallmeijer
A J Dallmeijer
LWL H V van der Woude
L H V van der Woude

1 July 2005 in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDStefan van Drongelen
Stefan van Drongelen
LWLucas H. van der Woude
Lucas H. van der Woude
TJThomas W. Janssen
Thomas W. Janssen
EAEdmond L. Angenot
Edmond L. Angenot
ECEdward K. Chadwick
Edward K. Chadwick
H.E.J. (DirkJan) VeegerH.E.J. (DirkJan) Veeger
H.E.J. (DirkJan) Veeger

1 March 2012 in Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Ursina ArnetUrsina Arnet
Ursina Arnet
SDStefan van Drongelen
Stefan van Drongelen
Anke Scheel-SailerAnke Scheel-Sailer
Anke Scheel-Sailer
LWL Woude
L Woude
H.E.J. (DirkJan) VeegerH.E.J. (DirkJan) Veeger
H.E.J. (DirkJan) Veeger
To compare the shoulder load during handcycling and wheelchair propulsion under similar conditions of external power in persons with spinal cord injury. Cross-sectional. Eight men with spinal cord injury. Kinetics and kinematics were measured during handbike and wheelchair propulsion at 25, 35, 45 and 55 W on a treadmill. Shoulder load (glenohumeral contact forces, relative muscle forces) was calculated with the Delft Shoulder and Elbow Model. At all power output levels, glenohumeral contact forces were significantly lower during handcycling compared with wheelchair propulsion (p < 0.001). At 55 W, the mean glenohumeral contact force was 345 N for hand-cycling, whereas it was 585 N for wheelchair propulsion. Also, relative muscle forces were lower during handcycling. The largest differences between handbike and wheelchair propulsion were found in the supraspinatus (4.5% vs. 20.7%), infraspinatus (3.7% vs. 16.5%) and biceps (5.0% vs. 17.7%). Due to continuous force application in hand-cycling, shoulder load was lower compared with wheelchair propulsion. Furthermore, muscles that are prone to overuse injuries were less stressed during handcycling. Therefore, handcycling may be a good alternative for outdoor mobility and may help prevent overuse injuries of the shoulder complex.

1 November 2014 in Research in Developmental Disabilities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMatthias C.M. Klotz
Matthias C.M. Klotz
SDStefan van Drongelen
Stefan van Drongelen
OROliver Rettig
Oliver Rettig
PWPatrick Wenger
Patrick Wenger
SGSimone Gantz
Simone Gantz
SWSebastian Wolf
Sebastian Wolf

1 January 2009 in Clinical Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBD.J.J. Bregman
D.J.J. Bregman
SDStefan van Drongelen
Stefan van Drongelen
HVH.E.J. Veeger
H.E.J. Veeger